Cargando…

Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance

Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooke, James E., Weir, Laura, Clarkston, Bridgette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137
_version_ 1783453182789156864
author Cooke, James E.
Weir, Laura
Clarkston, Bridgette
author_facet Cooke, James E.
Weir, Laura
Clarkston, Bridgette
author_sort Cooke, James E.
collection PubMed
description Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams and content retention have used questions that all, or mostly, require students to select an answer, rather than generate one of their own. However, content retention can improve when students generate their own responses. Thus, we examined the effect of collaborative exams with open-ended questions on retention of course content. Retention was measured at two time periods; one relatively shortly (9 days) following a collaborative exam and another over a longer time period (23 days). Furthermore, we examined whether content retention differed for low-, mid-, or high-­performing students. Our results suggest that collaborative exams offer retention benefits at relatively long time periods between pre- and posttests, but not over shorter time periods. Retention varied across students in different performance categories. Our study, the first to use only open-ended questions, showed relatively small effects compared with studies using multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank format, but still suggest that collaborative exams can aid in content retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67552062019-10-15 Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance Cooke, James E. Weir, Laura Clarkston, Bridgette CBE Life Sci Educ Article Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams and content retention have used questions that all, or mostly, require students to select an answer, rather than generate one of their own. However, content retention can improve when students generate their own responses. Thus, we examined the effect of collaborative exams with open-ended questions on retention of course content. Retention was measured at two time periods; one relatively shortly (9 days) following a collaborative exam and another over a longer time period (23 days). Furthermore, we examined whether content retention differed for low-, mid-, or high-­performing students. Our results suggest that collaborative exams offer retention benefits at relatively long time periods between pre- and posttests, but not over shorter time periods. Retention varied across students in different performance categories. Our study, the first to use only open-ended questions, showed relatively small effects compared with studies using multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank format, but still suggest that collaborative exams can aid in content retention. American Society for Cell Biology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6755206/ /pubmed/31008674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137 Text en © 2019 J. E. Cooke, L. Weir, and B. Clarkston. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2019 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Cooke, James E.
Weir, Laura
Clarkston, Bridgette
Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title_full Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title_fullStr Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title_full_unstemmed Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title_short Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance
title_sort retention following two-stage collaborative exams depends on timing and student performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137
work_keys_str_mv AT cookejamese retentionfollowingtwostagecollaborativeexamsdependsontimingandstudentperformance
AT weirlaura retentionfollowingtwostagecollaborativeexamsdependsontimingandstudentperformance
AT clarkstonbridgette retentionfollowingtwostagecollaborativeexamsdependsontimingandstudentperformance