Cargando…
Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing?
Threshold concepts are fundamental to a discipline and, once understood, transform students’ understanding and perception of the subject. Despite the value of threshold concepts as a learning “portal” for heuristic purposes, there is limited empirical evidence of threshold crossing or achieving mast...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0241 |
_version_ | 1783453207694934016 |
---|---|
author | Walck-Shannon, Elise Batzli, Janet Pultorak, Josh Boehmer, Hailey |
author_facet | Walck-Shannon, Elise Batzli, Janet Pultorak, Josh Boehmer, Hailey |
author_sort | Walck-Shannon, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Threshold concepts are fundamental to a discipline and, once understood, transform students’ understanding and perception of the subject. Despite the value of threshold concepts as a learning “portal” for heuristic purposes, there is limited empirical evidence of threshold crossing or achieving mastery. As a threshold concept, biological variation within species is fundamental to understanding evolution and provides a target for analyzing threshold crossing. We aimed to 1) examine student understanding of variation using four dimensions of a threshold concept (discursive, troublesome, liminal, and integrative), 2) measure “threshold crossing,” and 3) investigate the utility of the threshold concept framework to curriculum design. We conducted semistructured interviews of 29 students affiliated with a “variation-enriched” curriculum in a cross-sectional design with precurriculum, current, and postcurriculum groups (Pre, Current, and Post) and an outgroup of three postbaccalaureate advanced learners (Outgroup). Interview transcripts revealed that Current students expand their “variation discourse,” while the Post group and Outgroup displayed conformity in word choice about variation. The Post and Current groups displayed less troublesome and more integrative responses. Pre, Post, and Outgroup explanations’ revealed liminality, with discomfort and uncertainty regardless of accuracy. When we combined all four threshold concept dimensions for each respondent, patterns indicative of threshold crossing emerged along with new insight regarding curricular design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6755314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67553142019-10-15 Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? Walck-Shannon, Elise Batzli, Janet Pultorak, Josh Boehmer, Hailey CBE Life Sci Educ Article Threshold concepts are fundamental to a discipline and, once understood, transform students’ understanding and perception of the subject. Despite the value of threshold concepts as a learning “portal” for heuristic purposes, there is limited empirical evidence of threshold crossing or achieving mastery. As a threshold concept, biological variation within species is fundamental to understanding evolution and provides a target for analyzing threshold crossing. We aimed to 1) examine student understanding of variation using four dimensions of a threshold concept (discursive, troublesome, liminal, and integrative), 2) measure “threshold crossing,” and 3) investigate the utility of the threshold concept framework to curriculum design. We conducted semistructured interviews of 29 students affiliated with a “variation-enriched” curriculum in a cross-sectional design with precurriculum, current, and postcurriculum groups (Pre, Current, and Post) and an outgroup of three postbaccalaureate advanced learners (Outgroup). Interview transcripts revealed that Current students expand their “variation discourse,” while the Post group and Outgroup displayed conformity in word choice about variation. The Post and Current groups displayed less troublesome and more integrative responses. Pre, Post, and Outgroup explanations’ revealed liminality, with discomfort and uncertainty regardless of accuracy. When we combined all four threshold concept dimensions for each respondent, patterns indicative of threshold crossing emerged along with new insight regarding curricular design. American Society for Cell Biology 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6755314/ /pubmed/31418654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0241 Text en © 2019 E. Walck-Shannon et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2019 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Article Walck-Shannon, Elise Batzli, Janet Pultorak, Josh Boehmer, Hailey Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title | Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title_full | Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title_fullStr | Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title_short | Biological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing? |
title_sort | biological variation as a threshold concept: can we measure threshold crossing? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walckshannonelise biologicalvariationasathresholdconceptcanwemeasurethresholdcrossing AT batzlijanet biologicalvariationasathresholdconceptcanwemeasurethresholdcrossing AT pultorakjosh biologicalvariationasathresholdconceptcanwemeasurethresholdcrossing AT boehmerhailey biologicalvariationasathresholdconceptcanwemeasurethresholdcrossing |