Cargando…

Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: In migraine patients with cervical myofascial trigger points whose target areas coincide with migraine sites (M + cTrPs), TrP anesthetic injection reduces migraine symptoms, but the procedure often causes discomfort. This study evaluated if a topical TrP treatment with 3% nimesulide gel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Affaitati, Giannapia, Costantini, Raffaele, Tana, Claudio, Lapenna, Domenico, Schiavone, Cosima, Cipollone, Francesco, Giamberardino, Maria Adele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0934-3
_version_ 1783453256012267520
author Affaitati, Giannapia
Costantini, Raffaele
Tana, Claudio
Lapenna, Domenico
Schiavone, Cosima
Cipollone, Francesco
Giamberardino, Maria Adele
author_facet Affaitati, Giannapia
Costantini, Raffaele
Tana, Claudio
Lapenna, Domenico
Schiavone, Cosima
Cipollone, Francesco
Giamberardino, Maria Adele
author_sort Affaitati, Giannapia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In migraine patients with cervical myofascial trigger points whose target areas coincide with migraine sites (M + cTrPs), TrP anesthetic injection reduces migraine symptoms, but the procedure often causes discomfort. This study evaluated if a topical TrP treatment with 3% nimesulide gel has similar efficacy as the injection but produces lesser discomfort with higher acceptability by the patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical charts of M + cTrPs patients in the period January 2012–December 2016 at a single Headache Center. Three groups of 25 patients each were included, all receiving migraine prophylaxis (flunarizine 5 mg/day) for 3 months and symptomatic treatment on demand. Group 1 received no TrP treatment, group 2 received TrP injections (bupivacaine 5 mg/ml at basis, 3rd, 10th, 30th and 60th day), group 3 received daily TrP topical treatment with 1.5 g of 3% nimesulide gel for 15 consecutive days, 15 days interruption and again 15 consecutive days. The following were evaluated: monthly number of migraine attacks and rescue medications, migraine intensity; pain thresholds to skin electrical stimulation (EPTs) and muscle pressure stimulation (PPTs) in TrP and target (basis, 30th, 60th and 180th days); discomfort from, acceptability of and willingness to repeat treatment (end of study). ANOVA for repeated measures and 1-way ANOVA were used to assess temporal trends in each group and comparisons among groups, respectively. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Migraine improved over time in all groups, but significantly more and earlier in those receiving TrP treatment vs no TrP treatment (0.02 < p < 0.0001, 30–180 days for intensity and rescue medication, 60–180 days for number). All thresholds in the non-TrP-treated group did not change over time, while significantly improving in both the injection and nimesulide gel groups (0.01 < p < 0.0001, 30–180 days). Improvement of migraine and thresholds did not differ in the two TrP-treated groups. Discomfort was significantly lower, acceptability and willingness to repeat treatment significantly higher (0.05 < p < 0.0001) with gel than injection. CONCLUSION: In migraine patients, topical treatment of cervical TrPs with 5% nimesulide gel proves equally effective as TrP injection with local anesthetics but more acceptable by the patients. This treatment could be effectively associated to standard migraine prophylaxis to improve therapeutic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67555512019-09-26 Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis Affaitati, Giannapia Costantini, Raffaele Tana, Claudio Lapenna, Domenico Schiavone, Cosima Cipollone, Francesco Giamberardino, Maria Adele J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: In migraine patients with cervical myofascial trigger points whose target areas coincide with migraine sites (M + cTrPs), TrP anesthetic injection reduces migraine symptoms, but the procedure often causes discomfort. This study evaluated if a topical TrP treatment with 3% nimesulide gel has similar efficacy as the injection but produces lesser discomfort with higher acceptability by the patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical charts of M + cTrPs patients in the period January 2012–December 2016 at a single Headache Center. Three groups of 25 patients each were included, all receiving migraine prophylaxis (flunarizine 5 mg/day) for 3 months and symptomatic treatment on demand. Group 1 received no TrP treatment, group 2 received TrP injections (bupivacaine 5 mg/ml at basis, 3rd, 10th, 30th and 60th day), group 3 received daily TrP topical treatment with 1.5 g of 3% nimesulide gel for 15 consecutive days, 15 days interruption and again 15 consecutive days. The following were evaluated: monthly number of migraine attacks and rescue medications, migraine intensity; pain thresholds to skin electrical stimulation (EPTs) and muscle pressure stimulation (PPTs) in TrP and target (basis, 30th, 60th and 180th days); discomfort from, acceptability of and willingness to repeat treatment (end of study). ANOVA for repeated measures and 1-way ANOVA were used to assess temporal trends in each group and comparisons among groups, respectively. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Migraine improved over time in all groups, but significantly more and earlier in those receiving TrP treatment vs no TrP treatment (0.02 < p < 0.0001, 30–180 days for intensity and rescue medication, 60–180 days for number). All thresholds in the non-TrP-treated group did not change over time, while significantly improving in both the injection and nimesulide gel groups (0.01 < p < 0.0001, 30–180 days). Improvement of migraine and thresholds did not differ in the two TrP-treated groups. Discomfort was significantly lower, acceptability and willingness to repeat treatment significantly higher (0.05 < p < 0.0001) with gel than injection. CONCLUSION: In migraine patients, topical treatment of cervical TrPs with 5% nimesulide gel proves equally effective as TrP injection with local anesthetics but more acceptable by the patients. This treatment could be effectively associated to standard migraine prophylaxis to improve therapeutic outcomes. Springer Milan 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6755551/ /pubmed/30409108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0934-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Affaitati, Giannapia
Costantini, Raffaele
Tana, Claudio
Lapenna, Domenico
Schiavone, Cosima
Cipollone, Francesco
Giamberardino, Maria Adele
Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title_full Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title_short Effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
title_sort effects of topical vs injection treatment of cervical myofascial trigger points on headache symptoms in migraine patients: a retrospective analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0934-3
work_keys_str_mv AT affaitatigiannapia effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT costantiniraffaele effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT tanaclaudio effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT lapennadomenico effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT schiavonecosima effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT cipollonefrancesco effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT giamberardinomariaadele effectsoftopicalvsinjectiontreatmentofcervicalmyofascialtriggerpointsonheadachesymptomsinmigrainepatientsaretrospectiveanalysis