Cargando…

Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review to identify and discuss methodological issues surrounding decision modelling for economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) in dementia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for publications usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sopina, Elizaveta, Sørensen, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29582186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0192-8
_version_ 1783453260666896384
author Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
author_facet Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
author_sort Sopina, Elizaveta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review to identify and discuss methodological issues surrounding decision modelling for economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) in dementia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for publications using decision modelling to investigate the cost-effectiveness of NPIs for individuals with dementia. Search was limited to studies in English. Studies were excluded if they evaluated interventions aimed only at caregivers of patients with dementia, or if they only included economic evaluation alongside an RCT without additional modelling. RESULTS: Two primary, five secondary and three tertiary prevention intervention studies were identified and reviewed. Five studies utilised Markov models, with others using discrete event, regression-based simulation, and decision tree approaches. A number of challenging methodological issues were identified, including the use of MMSE-score as the main outcome measure, limited number of strategies compared, restricted time horizons, and limited or dated data on dementia onset, progression and mortality. Only one of the three tertiary prevention studies explicitly considered the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies alongside their intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations of NPIs in dementia should utilise purposefully-developed decision models, and avoid models for evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Broader outcome measures could be a way to capture the wide impact of NPIs for dementia in future decision models. It is also important to account for the effects of pharmacological therapies alongside the NPIs in economic evaluations. Access to more localised and up-to-date data on dementia onset, progression and mortality is a priority for accurate prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13561-018-0192-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67555712019-09-26 Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies Sopina, Elizaveta Sørensen, Jan Health Econ Rev Review OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review to identify and discuss methodological issues surrounding decision modelling for economic evaluation of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) in dementia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for publications using decision modelling to investigate the cost-effectiveness of NPIs for individuals with dementia. Search was limited to studies in English. Studies were excluded if they evaluated interventions aimed only at caregivers of patients with dementia, or if they only included economic evaluation alongside an RCT without additional modelling. RESULTS: Two primary, five secondary and three tertiary prevention intervention studies were identified and reviewed. Five studies utilised Markov models, with others using discrete event, regression-based simulation, and decision tree approaches. A number of challenging methodological issues were identified, including the use of MMSE-score as the main outcome measure, limited number of strategies compared, restricted time horizons, and limited or dated data on dementia onset, progression and mortality. Only one of the three tertiary prevention studies explicitly considered the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies alongside their intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations of NPIs in dementia should utilise purposefully-developed decision models, and avoid models for evaluation of pharmaceuticals. Broader outcome measures could be a way to capture the wide impact of NPIs for dementia in future decision models. It is also important to account for the effects of pharmacological therapies alongside the NPIs in economic evaluations. Access to more localised and up-to-date data on dementia onset, progression and mortality is a priority for accurate prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13561-018-0192-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6755571/ /pubmed/29582186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0192-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Sopina, Elizaveta
Sørensen, Jan
Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title_full Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title_fullStr Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title_short Decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
title_sort decision modelling of non-pharmacological interventions for individuals with dementia: a systematic review of methodologies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29582186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0192-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sopinaelizaveta decisionmodellingofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforindividualswithdementiaasystematicreviewofmethodologies
AT sørensenjan decisionmodellingofnonpharmacologicalinterventionsforindividualswithdementiaasystematicreviewofmethodologies