Cargando…

Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis

BACKGROUND: Regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions are necessary if new drugs are to become accessible in a timely manner. However, the process of regulatory approval and the establishment of reimbursement decisions varies across countries. This study aims to analyze the duration between re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Son, Kyung-Bok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0216-4
_version_ 1783453265419042816
author Son, Kyung-Bok
author_facet Son, Kyung-Bok
author_sort Son, Kyung-Bok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions are necessary if new drugs are to become accessible in a timely manner. However, the process of regulatory approval and the establishment of reimbursement decisions varies across countries. This study aims to analyze the duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision for new drugs and to evaluate various factors affecting the timely availability of new medicines in the Korean market. The duration was subdivided into regulatory approval–reimbursement application and reimbursement application–reimbursement decision. We used pharmaceutical approval data to identify new medicines, retrieved documents from the pharmaceutical benefits committee to collect information on reimbursement decision, and applied a non-parametric event history model. RESULTS: A total of 128 new medicines applied for reimbursement decision, including 85 drugs between 2007 and 2013 and 43 drugs between 2014 and 2016. Delays in access to new medicines occurred at various levels, and various factors affected in different durations. In proportional hazard model, the second period shortened all durations in the models. Biologics and clinically improved drugs were the factor that delayed the duration of regulatory approval–reimbursement application, while uncertain drugs in clinical effectiveness and ATC J or L delayed the duration of reimbursement application–reimbursement decision. CONCLUSIONS: The duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision has decreased, and the main cause of the delay has changed. For instance, the proportion of reimbursement trial–reimbursement decision in the total duration was 62.9% (18.39 months out of 29.24 months) in the first period, while the proportion of regulatory approval–reimbursement trial in the total duration was 64.2% (8.6 months out of 13.40 months) in the second period. A series of policies to reinforce access to medicines after 2014 has been effective for the timely availability of new medicines, including both prompt reimbursement application decided by manufacturers and timely review process by the authorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67555912019-09-26 Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis Son, Kyung-Bok Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Regulatory approval and reimbursement decisions are necessary if new drugs are to become accessible in a timely manner. However, the process of regulatory approval and the establishment of reimbursement decisions varies across countries. This study aims to analyze the duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision for new drugs and to evaluate various factors affecting the timely availability of new medicines in the Korean market. The duration was subdivided into regulatory approval–reimbursement application and reimbursement application–reimbursement decision. We used pharmaceutical approval data to identify new medicines, retrieved documents from the pharmaceutical benefits committee to collect information on reimbursement decision, and applied a non-parametric event history model. RESULTS: A total of 128 new medicines applied for reimbursement decision, including 85 drugs between 2007 and 2013 and 43 drugs between 2014 and 2016. Delays in access to new medicines occurred at various levels, and various factors affected in different durations. In proportional hazard model, the second period shortened all durations in the models. Biologics and clinically improved drugs were the factor that delayed the duration of regulatory approval–reimbursement application, while uncertain drugs in clinical effectiveness and ATC J or L delayed the duration of reimbursement application–reimbursement decision. CONCLUSIONS: The duration between regulatory approval and reimbursement decision has decreased, and the main cause of the delay has changed. For instance, the proportion of reimbursement trial–reimbursement decision in the total duration was 62.9% (18.39 months out of 29.24 months) in the first period, while the proportion of regulatory approval–reimbursement trial in the total duration was 64.2% (8.6 months out of 13.40 months) in the second period. A series of policies to reinforce access to medicines after 2014 has been effective for the timely availability of new medicines, including both prompt reimbursement application decided by manufacturers and timely review process by the authorities. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6755591/ /pubmed/30515584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0216-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Son, Kyung-Bok
Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title_full Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title_fullStr Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title_short Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
title_sort understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the south korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0216-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sonkyungbok understandingtheadoptionofnewdrugsdecidedbyseveralstakeholdersinthesouthkoreanmarketanonparametriceventhistoryanalysis