Cargando…

Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets

Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kensert, Alexander, Alvarsson, Jonathan, Norinder, Ulf, Spjuth, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9
_version_ 1783453267637829632
author Kensert, Alexander
Alvarsson, Jonathan
Norinder, Ulf
Spjuth, Ola
author_facet Kensert, Alexander
Alvarsson, Jonathan
Norinder, Ulf
Spjuth, Ola
author_sort Kensert, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study we analyzed four data sets and studied the efficiency of machine learning methods on sparse data structures, utilizing Morgan fingerprints of different radii and hash sizes, and compared with molecular signatures descriptor of different height. We specifically evaluated the effect these parameters had on modeling time, predictive performance, and memory requirements using two implementations of random forest; Scikit-learn as well as FEST. We also compared with a support vector machine implementation. Our results showed that unhashed fingerprints yield significantly better accuracy than hashed fingerprints ([Formula: see text] ), with no pronounced deterioration in modeling time and memory usage. Furthermore, the fast execution and low memory usage of the FEST algorithm suggest that it is a good alternative for large, high dimensional sparse data. Both support vector machines and random forest performed equally well but results indicate that the support vector machine was better at using the extra information from larger values of the Morgan fingerprint’s radius. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67556002019-09-26 Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets Kensert, Alexander Alvarsson, Jonathan Norinder, Ulf Spjuth, Ola J Cheminform Research Article Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study we analyzed four data sets and studied the efficiency of machine learning methods on sparse data structures, utilizing Morgan fingerprints of different radii and hash sizes, and compared with molecular signatures descriptor of different height. We specifically evaluated the effect these parameters had on modeling time, predictive performance, and memory requirements using two implementations of random forest; Scikit-learn as well as FEST. We also compared with a support vector machine implementation. Our results showed that unhashed fingerprints yield significantly better accuracy than hashed fingerprints ([Formula: see text] ), with no pronounced deterioration in modeling time and memory usage. Furthermore, the fast execution and low memory usage of the FEST algorithm suggest that it is a good alternative for large, high dimensional sparse data. Both support vector machines and random forest performed equally well but results indicate that the support vector machine was better at using the extra information from larger values of the Morgan fingerprint’s radius. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6755600/ /pubmed/30306349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kensert, Alexander
Alvarsson, Jonathan
Norinder, Ulf
Spjuth, Ola
Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title_full Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title_fullStr Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title_short Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
title_sort evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kensertalexander evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets
AT alvarssonjonathan evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets
AT norinderulf evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets
AT spjuthola evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets