Cargando…
Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets
Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9 |
_version_ | 1783453267637829632 |
---|---|
author | Kensert, Alexander Alvarsson, Jonathan Norinder, Ulf Spjuth, Ola |
author_facet | Kensert, Alexander Alvarsson, Jonathan Norinder, Ulf Spjuth, Ola |
author_sort | Kensert, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study we analyzed four data sets and studied the efficiency of machine learning methods on sparse data structures, utilizing Morgan fingerprints of different radii and hash sizes, and compared with molecular signatures descriptor of different height. We specifically evaluated the effect these parameters had on modeling time, predictive performance, and memory requirements using two implementations of random forest; Scikit-learn as well as FEST. We also compared with a support vector machine implementation. Our results showed that unhashed fingerprints yield significantly better accuracy than hashed fingerprints ([Formula: see text] ), with no pronounced deterioration in modeling time and memory usage. Furthermore, the fast execution and low memory usage of the FEST algorithm suggest that it is a good alternative for large, high dimensional sparse data. Both support vector machines and random forest performed equally well but results indicate that the support vector machine was better at using the extra information from larger values of the Morgan fingerprint’s radius. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6755600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67556002019-09-26 Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets Kensert, Alexander Alvarsson, Jonathan Norinder, Ulf Spjuth, Ola J Cheminform Research Article Ligand-based predictive modeling is widely used to generate predictive models aiding decision making in e.g. drug discovery projects. With growing data sets and requirements on low modeling time comes the necessity to analyze data sets efficiently to support rapid and robust modeling. In this study we analyzed four data sets and studied the efficiency of machine learning methods on sparse data structures, utilizing Morgan fingerprints of different radii and hash sizes, and compared with molecular signatures descriptor of different height. We specifically evaluated the effect these parameters had on modeling time, predictive performance, and memory requirements using two implementations of random forest; Scikit-learn as well as FEST. We also compared with a support vector machine implementation. Our results showed that unhashed fingerprints yield significantly better accuracy than hashed fingerprints ([Formula: see text] ), with no pronounced deterioration in modeling time and memory usage. Furthermore, the fast execution and low memory usage of the FEST algorithm suggest that it is a good alternative for large, high dimensional sparse data. Both support vector machines and random forest performed equally well but results indicate that the support vector machine was better at using the extra information from larger values of the Morgan fingerprint’s radius. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6755600/ /pubmed/30306349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kensert, Alexander Alvarsson, Jonathan Norinder, Ulf Spjuth, Ola Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title | Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title_full | Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title_fullStr | Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title_short | Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
title_sort | evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30306349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0304-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kensertalexander evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets AT alvarssonjonathan evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets AT norinderulf evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets AT spjuthola evaluatingparametersforligandbasedmodelingwithrandomforestonsparsedatasets |