Cargando…
Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view
BACKGROUND: Health Technology Assessments (HTA) procedures differ substantially across the various European countries. We reviewed recent appraisals of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in three major European markets (France; Italy; Germany) and identified and categorized related decision drivers. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0201-y |
_version_ | 1783453269342814208 |
---|---|
author | Giuliani, Giovanni Chassagnol, Frederic Traub, David Gyldmark, Marlene Hebborn, Ansgar Ducournau, Pierre Ruof, Jörg |
author_facet | Giuliani, Giovanni Chassagnol, Frederic Traub, David Gyldmark, Marlene Hebborn, Ansgar Ducournau, Pierre Ruof, Jörg |
author_sort | Giuliani, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health Technology Assessments (HTA) procedures differ substantially across the various European countries. We reviewed recent appraisals of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in three major European markets (France; Italy; Germany) and identified and categorized related decision drivers. METHODS: New marketing authorisation between January 2011 and August 2017, and Roche being the Marketing Authorization Holder, were included. Outcome of HTA appraisals by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), and Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) were reviewed. Respective decision drivers were identified and commonalities and differences across the three countries were determined leveraging the EUnetHTA conceptual taxonomy (i.e. the 9 domains of the EUnetHTA core model). RESULTS: Within that time period Roche received European marketing authorization for eight new molecular entities (10 indications, respectively). Outcome of HTA appraisals was heterogeneous across the three countries. However, the four clinical domains of the EUnetHTA core model were driving the national HTA appraisals, with the clinical effectiveness domain being of most importance. Important drivers related to the other three clinical domains included the target patient population (subgroups, Germany), the current management of the condition (unmet need, Italy), the regulatory status (Orphan Designation, Germany), as well as safety considerations (all three countries). Average time between EMA approval and full commercial availability of new medicines was 63 (Germany), 459 (Italy), and 557 days (France). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical domains of the EUnetHTA framework are mainly driven by national HTA appraisals, providing a suitable starting point for further developing a joint European view on value and evidence. Underlying topics and issues still reveal considerable differences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6755607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67556072019-09-26 Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view Giuliani, Giovanni Chassagnol, Frederic Traub, David Gyldmark, Marlene Hebborn, Ansgar Ducournau, Pierre Ruof, Jörg Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Health Technology Assessments (HTA) procedures differ substantially across the various European countries. We reviewed recent appraisals of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in three major European markets (France; Italy; Germany) and identified and categorized related decision drivers. METHODS: New marketing authorisation between January 2011 and August 2017, and Roche being the Marketing Authorization Holder, were included. Outcome of HTA appraisals by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA), and Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) were reviewed. Respective decision drivers were identified and commonalities and differences across the three countries were determined leveraging the EUnetHTA conceptual taxonomy (i.e. the 9 domains of the EUnetHTA core model). RESULTS: Within that time period Roche received European marketing authorization for eight new molecular entities (10 indications, respectively). Outcome of HTA appraisals was heterogeneous across the three countries. However, the four clinical domains of the EUnetHTA core model were driving the national HTA appraisals, with the clinical effectiveness domain being of most importance. Important drivers related to the other three clinical domains included the target patient population (subgroups, Germany), the current management of the condition (unmet need, Italy), the regulatory status (Orphan Designation, Germany), as well as safety considerations (all three countries). Average time between EMA approval and full commercial availability of new medicines was 63 (Germany), 459 (Italy), and 557 days (France). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical domains of the EUnetHTA framework are mainly driven by national HTA appraisals, providing a suitable starting point for further developing a joint European view on value and evidence. Underlying topics and issues still reveal considerable differences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6755607/ /pubmed/30242522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0201-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Giuliani, Giovanni Chassagnol, Frederic Traub, David Gyldmark, Marlene Hebborn, Ansgar Ducournau, Pierre Ruof, Jörg Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title | Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title_full | Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title_fullStr | Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title_full_unstemmed | Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title_short | Leveraging EUnetHTA’s conceptual framework to compare HTA decision drivers in France, Italy, and Germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
title_sort | leveraging eunethta’s conceptual framework to compare hta decision drivers in france, italy, and germany from a manufacturer’s point of view |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0201-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giulianigiovanni leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT chassagnolfrederic leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT traubdavid leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT gyldmarkmarlene leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT hebbornansgar leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT ducournaupierre leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview AT ruofjorg leveragingeunethtasconceptualframeworktocomparehtadecisiondriversinfranceitalyandgermanyfromamanufacturerspointofview |