Cargando…

A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality

BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Junxin, Shen, Jiabin, Zhu, Motao, Wheeler, Krista K., Lu, Bo, Kenney, Brian, Nuss, Kathryn E., Xiang, Henry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8
_version_ 1783453284856496128
author Shi, Junxin
Shen, Jiabin
Zhu, Motao
Wheeler, Krista K.
Lu, Bo
Kenney, Brian
Nuss, Kathryn E.
Xiang, Henry
author_facet Shi, Junxin
Shen, Jiabin
Zhu, Motao
Wheeler, Krista K.
Lu, Bo
Kenney, Brian
Nuss, Kathryn E.
Xiang, Henry
author_sort Shi, Junxin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involved in the calculation of ISS are given equal weights. The objective of this study was to develop a weighted injury severity scoring (wISS) system for adult trauma patients with better predictive power than the traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS: The 2007–2014 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Research Datasets were used. We identified adult trauma patients from the NTDB and then randomly split it into a study sample and a test sample. Based on the association between mortality and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from each of the six ISS body regions in the study sample, we evaluated 12 different sets of weights for the component AIS scores used in the calculation of ISS and selected one best set of weights. Discrimination (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, concordance) and calibration were compared between the wISS and ISS. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves from the wISS and ISS are all 0.83, and 0.76 vs. 0.73 for patients with ISS = 16–74 and 0.68 vs. 0.53 for patients with ISS = 25–74. The wISS showed higher specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance when they were compared at similar levels of sensitivity. The wISS had better calibration than the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: By weighting the AIS from different body regions, the wISS had significantly better predictive power for mortality than the ISS, especially in critically injured adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6755696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67556962019-09-26 A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality Shi, Junxin Shen, Jiabin Zhu, Motao Wheeler, Krista K. Lu, Bo Kenney, Brian Nuss, Kathryn E. Xiang, Henry Inj Epidemiol Research Methods BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involved in the calculation of ISS are given equal weights. The objective of this study was to develop a weighted injury severity scoring (wISS) system for adult trauma patients with better predictive power than the traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS: The 2007–2014 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Research Datasets were used. We identified adult trauma patients from the NTDB and then randomly split it into a study sample and a test sample. Based on the association between mortality and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from each of the six ISS body regions in the study sample, we evaluated 12 different sets of weights for the component AIS scores used in the calculation of ISS and selected one best set of weights. Discrimination (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, concordance) and calibration were compared between the wISS and ISS. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves from the wISS and ISS are all 0.83, and 0.76 vs. 0.73 for patients with ISS = 16–74 and 0.68 vs. 0.53 for patients with ISS = 25–74. The wISS showed higher specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance when they were compared at similar levels of sensitivity. The wISS had better calibration than the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: By weighting the AIS from different body regions, the wISS had significantly better predictive power for mortality than the ISS, especially in critically injured adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6755696/ /pubmed/31559123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Shi, Junxin
Shen, Jiabin
Zhu, Motao
Wheeler, Krista K.
Lu, Bo
Kenney, Brian
Nuss, Kathryn E.
Xiang, Henry
A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title_full A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title_fullStr A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title_full_unstemmed A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title_short A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
title_sort new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8
work_keys_str_mv AT shijunxin anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT shenjiabin anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT zhumotao anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT wheelerkristak anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT lubo anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT kenneybrian anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT nusskathryne anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT xianghenry anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT shijunxin newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT shenjiabin newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT zhumotao newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT wheelerkristak newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT lubo newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT kenneybrian newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT nusskathryne newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality
AT xianghenry newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality