Cargando…
A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality
BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8 |
_version_ | 1783453284856496128 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Junxin Shen, Jiabin Zhu, Motao Wheeler, Krista K. Lu, Bo Kenney, Brian Nuss, Kathryn E. Xiang, Henry |
author_facet | Shi, Junxin Shen, Jiabin Zhu, Motao Wheeler, Krista K. Lu, Bo Kenney, Brian Nuss, Kathryn E. Xiang, Henry |
author_sort | Shi, Junxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involved in the calculation of ISS are given equal weights. The objective of this study was to develop a weighted injury severity scoring (wISS) system for adult trauma patients with better predictive power than the traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS: The 2007–2014 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Research Datasets were used. We identified adult trauma patients from the NTDB and then randomly split it into a study sample and a test sample. Based on the association between mortality and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from each of the six ISS body regions in the study sample, we evaluated 12 different sets of weights for the component AIS scores used in the calculation of ISS and selected one best set of weights. Discrimination (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, concordance) and calibration were compared between the wISS and ISS. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves from the wISS and ISS are all 0.83, and 0.76 vs. 0.73 for patients with ISS = 16–74 and 0.68 vs. 0.53 for patients with ISS = 25–74. The wISS showed higher specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance when they were compared at similar levels of sensitivity. The wISS had better calibration than the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: By weighting the AIS from different body regions, the wISS had significantly better predictive power for mortality than the ISS, especially in critically injured adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6755696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67556962019-09-26 A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality Shi, Junxin Shen, Jiabin Zhu, Motao Wheeler, Krista K. Lu, Bo Kenney, Brian Nuss, Kathryn E. Xiang, Henry Inj Epidemiol Research Methods BACKGROUND: An accurate injury severity measurement is essential in the evaluation of trauma care and in outcome research. The traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not consider the differential risks of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from different body regions, and the three AIS involved in the calculation of ISS are given equal weights. The objective of this study was to develop a weighted injury severity scoring (wISS) system for adult trauma patients with better predictive power than the traditional Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS: The 2007–2014 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) Research Datasets were used. We identified adult trauma patients from the NTDB and then randomly split it into a study sample and a test sample. Based on the association between mortality and the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) from each of the six ISS body regions in the study sample, we evaluated 12 different sets of weights for the component AIS scores used in the calculation of ISS and selected one best set of weights. Discrimination (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, concordance) and calibration were compared between the wISS and ISS. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves from the wISS and ISS are all 0.83, and 0.76 vs. 0.73 for patients with ISS = 16–74 and 0.68 vs. 0.53 for patients with ISS = 25–74. The wISS showed higher specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and concordance when they were compared at similar levels of sensitivity. The wISS had better calibration than the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: By weighting the AIS from different body regions, the wISS had significantly better predictive power for mortality than the ISS, especially in critically injured adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6755696/ /pubmed/31559123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Shi, Junxin Shen, Jiabin Zhu, Motao Wheeler, Krista K. Lu, Bo Kenney, Brian Nuss, Kathryn E. Xiang, Henry A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title | A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title_full | A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title_fullStr | A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title_full_unstemmed | A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title_short | A new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
title_sort | new weighted injury severity scoring system: better predictive power for adult trauma mortality |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31559123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0217-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shijunxin anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT shenjiabin anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT zhumotao anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT wheelerkristak anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT lubo anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT kenneybrian anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT nusskathryne anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT xianghenry anewweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT shijunxin newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT shenjiabin newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT zhumotao newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT wheelerkristak newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT lubo newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT kenneybrian newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT nusskathryne newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality AT xianghenry newweightedinjuryseverityscoringsystembetterpredictivepowerforadulttraumamortality |