Cargando…
Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between Apr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420 |
_version_ | 1783453375464996864 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Oliver Su, Fangzhong Pears, Robert Walmsley, Emily Roderick, Paul |
author_facet | Kennedy, Oliver Su, Fangzhong Pears, Robert Walmsley, Emily Roderick, Paul |
author_sort | Kennedy, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between April 2011 and March 2015. SETTING: 151 general practices in Hampshire, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 366 005 participants born 1 April 1940–31 March 1976 eligible for an NHS HC. INTERVENTION: NHS HC invitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HC attendance and absolute percentage changes and ORs of (1) detecting cardiovascular disease (CVD) 10-year risk >10% and >20%, smokers, and total cholesterol (TC) >5.5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L; (2) diagnosing hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF); and (3) new interventions with statins, antihypertensives, antiglycaemics and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). RESULTS: HC attendance rose from 12% to 30% between 2011/2012 and 2014/2015 (p<0.001). HC invitation increased detection of CVD risk >10% (2.0%–3.6, p<0.001) and >20% (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.392), TC >5.5 mmol/L (4.1%–7.0%, p<0.001) and >7.5 mmol/L (0.3%–0.4% p<0.001), hypertension (0.3%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.003), and interventions with statins (0.2%–0.9%, p<0.001–0.017) and antihypertensives (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.205). There were no consistent differences in detection of smokers, NRT, or diabetes, AF or CKD. Multivariate analyses showed associations between HC invitation and detecting CVD risk >10% (OR 8.01, 95% CI 7.34 to 8.73) and >20% (5.86, 4.83 to 7.10), TC >5.5 mmol/L (3.72, 3.57 to 3.89) and >7.5 mmol/L (2.89, 2.46 to 3.38), and diagnoses of hypertension (1.33, 1.20 to 1.47) and diabetes (1.34, 1.12 to 1.61). OR of CVD risk >10% plus statin and >20% plus statin, respectively, was 2.90 (2.36 to 3.57) and 2.60 (1.92 to 3.52), and for hypertension plus antihypertensive was 1.33 (1.18 to 1.50). There were no associations with AF, CKD, antiglycaemics or NRT. Detection of several risk factors varied inversely by deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: HC invitation increased detection of cardiovascular risk factors, but corresponding increases in evidence-based interventions were modest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6756325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67563252019-10-07 Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial Kennedy, Oliver Su, Fangzhong Pears, Robert Walmsley, Emily Roderick, Paul BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between April 2011 and March 2015. SETTING: 151 general practices in Hampshire, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 366 005 participants born 1 April 1940–31 March 1976 eligible for an NHS HC. INTERVENTION: NHS HC invitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HC attendance and absolute percentage changes and ORs of (1) detecting cardiovascular disease (CVD) 10-year risk >10% and >20%, smokers, and total cholesterol (TC) >5.5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L; (2) diagnosing hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF); and (3) new interventions with statins, antihypertensives, antiglycaemics and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). RESULTS: HC attendance rose from 12% to 30% between 2011/2012 and 2014/2015 (p<0.001). HC invitation increased detection of CVD risk >10% (2.0%–3.6, p<0.001) and >20% (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.392), TC >5.5 mmol/L (4.1%–7.0%, p<0.001) and >7.5 mmol/L (0.3%–0.4% p<0.001), hypertension (0.3%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.003), and interventions with statins (0.2%–0.9%, p<0.001–0.017) and antihypertensives (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.205). There were no consistent differences in detection of smokers, NRT, or diabetes, AF or CKD. Multivariate analyses showed associations between HC invitation and detecting CVD risk >10% (OR 8.01, 95% CI 7.34 to 8.73) and >20% (5.86, 4.83 to 7.10), TC >5.5 mmol/L (3.72, 3.57 to 3.89) and >7.5 mmol/L (2.89, 2.46 to 3.38), and diagnoses of hypertension (1.33, 1.20 to 1.47) and diabetes (1.34, 1.12 to 1.61). OR of CVD risk >10% plus statin and >20% plus statin, respectively, was 2.90 (2.36 to 3.57) and 2.60 (1.92 to 3.52), and for hypertension plus antihypertensive was 1.33 (1.18 to 1.50). There were no associations with AF, CKD, antiglycaemics or NRT. Detection of several risk factors varied inversely by deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: HC invitation increased detection of cardiovascular risk factors, but corresponding increases in evidence-based interventions were modest. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6756325/ /pubmed/31542745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Kennedy, Oliver Su, Fangzhong Pears, Robert Walmsley, Emily Roderick, Paul Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating the effectiveness of the nhs health check programme in south england: a quasi-randomised controlled trial |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedyoliver evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sufangzhong evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pearsrobert evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT walmsleyemily evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT roderickpaul evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial |