Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between Apr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Oliver, Su, Fangzhong, Pears, Robert, Walmsley, Emily, Roderick, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420
_version_ 1783453375464996864
author Kennedy, Oliver
Su, Fangzhong
Pears, Robert
Walmsley, Emily
Roderick, Paul
author_facet Kennedy, Oliver
Su, Fangzhong
Pears, Robert
Walmsley, Emily
Roderick, Paul
author_sort Kennedy, Oliver
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between April 2011 and March 2015. SETTING: 151 general practices in Hampshire, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 366 005 participants born 1 April 1940–31 March 1976 eligible for an NHS HC. INTERVENTION: NHS HC invitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HC attendance and absolute percentage changes and ORs of (1) detecting cardiovascular disease (CVD) 10-year risk >10% and >20%, smokers, and total cholesterol (TC) >5.5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L; (2) diagnosing hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF); and (3) new interventions with statins, antihypertensives, antiglycaemics and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). RESULTS: HC attendance rose from 12% to 30% between 2011/2012 and 2014/2015 (p<0.001). HC invitation increased detection of CVD risk >10% (2.0%–3.6, p<0.001) and >20% (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.392), TC >5.5 mmol/L (4.1%–7.0%, p<0.001) and >7.5 mmol/L (0.3%–0.4% p<0.001), hypertension (0.3%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.003), and interventions with statins (0.2%–0.9%, p<0.001–0.017) and antihypertensives (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.205). There were no consistent differences in detection of smokers, NRT, or diabetes, AF or CKD. Multivariate analyses showed associations between HC invitation and detecting CVD risk >10% (OR 8.01, 95% CI 7.34 to 8.73) and >20% (5.86, 4.83 to 7.10), TC >5.5 mmol/L (3.72, 3.57 to 3.89) and >7.5 mmol/L (2.89, 2.46 to 3.38), and diagnoses of hypertension (1.33, 1.20 to 1.47) and diabetes (1.34, 1.12 to 1.61). OR of CVD risk >10% plus statin and >20% plus statin, respectively, was 2.90 (2.36 to 3.57) and 2.60 (1.92 to 3.52), and for hypertension plus antihypertensive was 1.33 (1.18 to 1.50). There were no associations with AF, CKD, antiglycaemics or NRT. Detection of several risk factors varied inversely by deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: HC invitation increased detection of cardiovascular risk factors, but corresponding increases in evidence-based interventions were modest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67563252019-10-07 Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial Kennedy, Oliver Su, Fangzhong Pears, Robert Walmsley, Emily Roderick, Paul BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uptake, risk factor detection and management from the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (HC). DESIGN: This is a quasi-randomised controlled trial where participants were allocated to five cohorts based on birth year. Four cohorts were invited for an NHS HC between April 2011 and March 2015. SETTING: 151 general practices in Hampshire, England, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 366 005 participants born 1 April 1940–31 March 1976 eligible for an NHS HC. INTERVENTION: NHS HC invitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HC attendance and absolute percentage changes and ORs of (1) detecting cardiovascular disease (CVD) 10-year risk >10% and >20%, smokers, and total cholesterol (TC) >5.5 mmol/L and >7.5 mmol/L; (2) diagnosing hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF); and (3) new interventions with statins, antihypertensives, antiglycaemics and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). RESULTS: HC attendance rose from 12% to 30% between 2011/2012 and 2014/2015 (p<0.001). HC invitation increased detection of CVD risk >10% (2.0%–3.6, p<0.001) and >20% (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.392), TC >5.5 mmol/L (4.1%–7.0%, p<0.001) and >7.5 mmol/L (0.3%–0.4% p<0.001), hypertension (0.3%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.003), and interventions with statins (0.2%–0.9%, p<0.001–0.017) and antihypertensives (0.1%–0.6%, p<0.001–0.205). There were no consistent differences in detection of smokers, NRT, or diabetes, AF or CKD. Multivariate analyses showed associations between HC invitation and detecting CVD risk >10% (OR 8.01, 95% CI 7.34 to 8.73) and >20% (5.86, 4.83 to 7.10), TC >5.5 mmol/L (3.72, 3.57 to 3.89) and >7.5 mmol/L (2.89, 2.46 to 3.38), and diagnoses of hypertension (1.33, 1.20 to 1.47) and diabetes (1.34, 1.12 to 1.61). OR of CVD risk >10% plus statin and >20% plus statin, respectively, was 2.90 (2.36 to 3.57) and 2.60 (1.92 to 3.52), and for hypertension plus antihypertensive was 1.33 (1.18 to 1.50). There were no associations with AF, CKD, antiglycaemics or NRT. Detection of several risk factors varied inversely by deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: HC invitation increased detection of cardiovascular risk factors, but corresponding increases in evidence-based interventions were modest. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6756325/ /pubmed/31542745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Kennedy, Oliver
Su, Fangzhong
Pears, Robert
Walmsley, Emily
Roderick, Paul
Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in South England: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of the nhs health check programme in south england: a quasi-randomised controlled trial
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029420
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedyoliver evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sufangzhong evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pearsrobert evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walmsleyemily evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roderickpaul evaluatingtheeffectivenessofthenhshealthcheckprogrammeinsouthenglandaquasirandomisedcontrolledtrial