Cargando…

Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis

OBJECTIVES: Choosing Wisely holds promise for increasing awareness of low-value care in physiotherapy. However, it is unclear how physiotherapists’ view Choosing Wisely recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate physiotherapists’ feedback on Choosing Wisely recommendations and investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zadro, Joshua, Peek, Aimie L, Dodd, Rachael H, McCaffery, Kirsten, Maher, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031360
_version_ 1783453377402765312
author Zadro, Joshua
Peek, Aimie L
Dodd, Rachael H
McCaffery, Kirsten
Maher, Christopher
author_facet Zadro, Joshua
Peek, Aimie L
Dodd, Rachael H
McCaffery, Kirsten
Maher, Christopher
author_sort Zadro, Joshua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Choosing Wisely holds promise for increasing awareness of low-value care in physiotherapy. However, it is unclear how physiotherapists’ view Choosing Wisely recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate physiotherapists’ feedback on Choosing Wisely recommendations and investigate agreement with each recommendation. SETTING: The Australian Physiotherapy Association emailed a survey to all 20 029 physiotherapist members in 2015 seeking feedback on a list of Choosing Wisely recommendations. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9764 physiotherapists opened the email invitation (49%) and 543 completed the survey (response rate 5.6%). Participants were asked about the acceptability of the wording of recommendations using a closed (Yes/No) and free-text response option (section 1). Then using a similar response format, participants were asked whether they agreed with each Choosing Wisely recommendation (sections 2–6). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We performed a content analysis of free-text responses (primary outcome) and used descriptive statistics to report agreement and disagreement with each recommendation (secondary outcome). RESULTS: There were 872 free-text responses across the six sections. A total of 347 physiotherapists (63.9%) agreed with the ‘don’t’ style of wording. Agreement with recommendations ranged from 52.3% (electrotherapy for back pain) to 76.6% (validated decision rules for imaging). The content analysis revealed that physiotherapists felt that blanket rules were inappropriate (range across recommendations: 13.9%–30.1% of responses), clinical experience is more valuable than evidence (11.7%–28.3%) and recommendations would benefit from further refining or better defining key terms (7.3%–22.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although most physiotherapists agreed with both the style of wording for Choosing Wisely recommendations and with the recommendations, their feedback highlighted a number of areas of disagreement and suggestions for improvement. These findings will support the development of future recommendations and are the first step towards increasing the impact Choosing Wisely has on physiotherapy practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67563332019-10-07 Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis Zadro, Joshua Peek, Aimie L Dodd, Rachael H McCaffery, Kirsten Maher, Christopher BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Choosing Wisely holds promise for increasing awareness of low-value care in physiotherapy. However, it is unclear how physiotherapists’ view Choosing Wisely recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate physiotherapists’ feedback on Choosing Wisely recommendations and investigate agreement with each recommendation. SETTING: The Australian Physiotherapy Association emailed a survey to all 20 029 physiotherapist members in 2015 seeking feedback on a list of Choosing Wisely recommendations. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9764 physiotherapists opened the email invitation (49%) and 543 completed the survey (response rate 5.6%). Participants were asked about the acceptability of the wording of recommendations using a closed (Yes/No) and free-text response option (section 1). Then using a similar response format, participants were asked whether they agreed with each Choosing Wisely recommendation (sections 2–6). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: We performed a content analysis of free-text responses (primary outcome) and used descriptive statistics to report agreement and disagreement with each recommendation (secondary outcome). RESULTS: There were 872 free-text responses across the six sections. A total of 347 physiotherapists (63.9%) agreed with the ‘don’t’ style of wording. Agreement with recommendations ranged from 52.3% (electrotherapy for back pain) to 76.6% (validated decision rules for imaging). The content analysis revealed that physiotherapists felt that blanket rules were inappropriate (range across recommendations: 13.9%–30.1% of responses), clinical experience is more valuable than evidence (11.7%–28.3%) and recommendations would benefit from further refining or better defining key terms (7.3%–22.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although most physiotherapists agreed with both the style of wording for Choosing Wisely recommendations and with the recommendations, their feedback highlighted a number of areas of disagreement and suggestions for improvement. These findings will support the development of future recommendations and are the first step towards increasing the impact Choosing Wisely has on physiotherapy practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6756333/ /pubmed/31542762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031360 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zadro, Joshua
Peek, Aimie L
Dodd, Rachael H
McCaffery, Kirsten
Maher, Christopher
Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title_full Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title_fullStr Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title_full_unstemmed Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title_short Physiotherapists’ views on the Australian Physiotherapy Association’s Choosing Wisely recommendations: a content analysis
title_sort physiotherapists’ views on the australian physiotherapy association’s choosing wisely recommendations: a content analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031360
work_keys_str_mv AT zadrojoshua physiotherapistsviewsontheaustralianphysiotherapyassociationschoosingwiselyrecommendationsacontentanalysis
AT peekaimiel physiotherapistsviewsontheaustralianphysiotherapyassociationschoosingwiselyrecommendationsacontentanalysis
AT doddrachaelh physiotherapistsviewsontheaustralianphysiotherapyassociationschoosingwiselyrecommendationsacontentanalysis
AT mccafferykirsten physiotherapistsviewsontheaustralianphysiotherapyassociationschoosingwiselyrecommendationsacontentanalysis
AT maherchristopher physiotherapistsviewsontheaustralianphysiotherapyassociationschoosingwiselyrecommendationsacontentanalysis