Cargando…

Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of clinical pathway simulation in machine learning, using clinical audit data, in order to identify key drivers for improving use and speed of thrombolysis at individual hospitals. DESIGN: Computer simulation modelling and machine learning. SETTING: Seven acute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Michael, Pearn, Kerry, Monks, Thomas, Bray, Benjamin D, Everson, Richard, Salmon, Andrew, James, Martin, Stein, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028296
_version_ 1783453402285473792
author Allen, Michael
Pearn, Kerry
Monks, Thomas
Bray, Benjamin D
Everson, Richard
Salmon, Andrew
James, Martin
Stein, Ken
author_facet Allen, Michael
Pearn, Kerry
Monks, Thomas
Bray, Benjamin D
Everson, Richard
Salmon, Andrew
James, Martin
Stein, Ken
author_sort Allen, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of clinical pathway simulation in machine learning, using clinical audit data, in order to identify key drivers for improving use and speed of thrombolysis at individual hospitals. DESIGN: Computer simulation modelling and machine learning. SETTING: Seven acute stroke units. PARTICIPANTS: Anonymised clinical audit data for 7864 patients. RESULTS: Three factors were pivotal in governing thrombolysis use: (1) the proportion of patients with a known stroke onset time (range 44%–73%), (2) pathway speed (for patients arriving within 4 hours of onset: per-hospital median arrival-to-scan ranged from 11 to 56 min; median scan-to-thrombolysis ranged from 21 to 44 min) and (3) predisposition to use thrombolysis (thrombolysis use ranged from 31% to 52% for patients with stroke scanned with 30 min left to administer thrombolysis). A pathway simulation model could predict the potential benefit of improving individual stages of the clinical pathway speed, whereas a machine learning model could predict the benefit of ‘exporting’ clinical decision making from one hospital to another, while allowing for differences in patient population between hospitals. By applying pathway simulation and machine learning together, we found a realistic ceiling of 15%–25% use of thrombolysis across different hospitals and, in the seven hospitals studied, a realistic opportunity to double the number of patients with no significant disability that may be attributed to thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: National clinical audit may be enhanced by a combination of pathway simulation and machine learning, which best allows for an understanding of key levers for improvement in hyperacute stroke pathways, allowing for differences between local patient populations. These models, based on standard clinical audit data, may be applied at scale while providing results at individual hospital level. The models facilitate understanding of variation and levers for improvement in stroke pathways, and help set realistic targets tailored to local populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67564662019-10-07 Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway Allen, Michael Pearn, Kerry Monks, Thomas Bray, Benjamin D Everson, Richard Salmon, Andrew James, Martin Stein, Ken BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of clinical pathway simulation in machine learning, using clinical audit data, in order to identify key drivers for improving use and speed of thrombolysis at individual hospitals. DESIGN: Computer simulation modelling and machine learning. SETTING: Seven acute stroke units. PARTICIPANTS: Anonymised clinical audit data for 7864 patients. RESULTS: Three factors were pivotal in governing thrombolysis use: (1) the proportion of patients with a known stroke onset time (range 44%–73%), (2) pathway speed (for patients arriving within 4 hours of onset: per-hospital median arrival-to-scan ranged from 11 to 56 min; median scan-to-thrombolysis ranged from 21 to 44 min) and (3) predisposition to use thrombolysis (thrombolysis use ranged from 31% to 52% for patients with stroke scanned with 30 min left to administer thrombolysis). A pathway simulation model could predict the potential benefit of improving individual stages of the clinical pathway speed, whereas a machine learning model could predict the benefit of ‘exporting’ clinical decision making from one hospital to another, while allowing for differences in patient population between hospitals. By applying pathway simulation and machine learning together, we found a realistic ceiling of 15%–25% use of thrombolysis across different hospitals and, in the seven hospitals studied, a realistic opportunity to double the number of patients with no significant disability that may be attributed to thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: National clinical audit may be enhanced by a combination of pathway simulation and machine learning, which best allows for an understanding of key levers for improvement in hyperacute stroke pathways, allowing for differences between local patient populations. These models, based on standard clinical audit data, may be applied at scale while providing results at individual hospital level. The models facilitate understanding of variation and levers for improvement in stroke pathways, and help set realistic targets tailored to local populations. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6756466/ /pubmed/31530590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028296 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Allen, Michael
Pearn, Kerry
Monks, Thomas
Bray, Benjamin D
Everson, Richard
Salmon, Andrew
James, Martin
Stein, Ken
Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title_full Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title_fullStr Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title_full_unstemmed Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title_short Can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? An example from the acute stroke pathway
title_sort can clinical audits be enhanced by pathway simulation and machine learning? an example from the acute stroke pathway
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31530590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028296
work_keys_str_mv AT allenmichael canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT pearnkerry canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT monksthomas canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT braybenjamind canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT eversonrichard canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT salmonandrew canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT jamesmartin canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway
AT steinken canclinicalauditsbeenhancedbypathwaysimulationandmachinelearninganexamplefromtheacutestrokepathway