Cargando…

Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments

Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Dejie, Liu, Nana, Wang, Weiyu, Akhtar, Kashif, Li, Na, Ren, Guangxin, Feng, Yongzhong, Yang, Gaihe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253
_version_ 1783453418812080128
author Kong, Dejie
Liu, Nana
Wang, Weiyu
Akhtar, Kashif
Li, Na
Ren, Guangxin
Feng, Yongzhong
Yang, Gaihe
author_facet Kong, Dejie
Liu, Nana
Wang, Weiyu
Akhtar, Kashif
Li, Na
Ren, Guangxin
Feng, Yongzhong
Yang, Gaihe
author_sort Kong, Dejie
collection PubMed
description Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm. We conducted a two-year field experiment with three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments in northwest China. The straw retention treatments included no straw retention (NS), retention of half the straw (HS), and retention of the total amount of straw (TS). The crop rotations treatments included winter wheat plus summer soybean (WS), winter wheat plus summer maize (WM), and winter wheat plus summer fallow (WF). Mean soil respiration rates under WS, WM, and WF treatments were 5.14, 6.53, and 5.49 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1); and 5.67, 5.47, and 6.03 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1) under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The mean soil water content were 15.50%, 15.57%, and 15.74% under WS, WM, and WF rotations, and 15.81%, 15.41%, and 15.50% under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration was higher with increased straw retention, and lower at deeper soil depths. Mean SOC concentrations under different rotations and straw treatments of TS, HS, and NS, respectively were as follows: WS: 6.91, 6.63, 6.39 g/kg; WM: 6.90, 6.72, 6.57 g/kg; and WF: 6.49, 6.52, 6.37 g/kg. Soil temperature was the main determinant of soil respiration rates. We conclude that WS rotation resulted in lower soil respiration, WM rotation resulted in a higher soil carbon sequestration potential, and WF rotation resulted in higher soil water content. However, continued, long-term monitoring is needed to confirm the effect of rotations and straw retention on soil respiration and carbon sequestration in dryland cropping systems in northern China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67565472019-10-04 Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments Kong, Dejie Liu, Nana Wang, Weiyu Akhtar, Kashif Li, Na Ren, Guangxin Feng, Yongzhong Yang, Gaihe PLoS One Research Article Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm. We conducted a two-year field experiment with three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments in northwest China. The straw retention treatments included no straw retention (NS), retention of half the straw (HS), and retention of the total amount of straw (TS). The crop rotations treatments included winter wheat plus summer soybean (WS), winter wheat plus summer maize (WM), and winter wheat plus summer fallow (WF). Mean soil respiration rates under WS, WM, and WF treatments were 5.14, 6.53, and 5.49 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1); and 5.67, 5.47, and 6.03 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1) under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The mean soil water content were 15.50%, 15.57%, and 15.74% under WS, WM, and WF rotations, and 15.81%, 15.41%, and 15.50% under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration was higher with increased straw retention, and lower at deeper soil depths. Mean SOC concentrations under different rotations and straw treatments of TS, HS, and NS, respectively were as follows: WS: 6.91, 6.63, 6.39 g/kg; WM: 6.90, 6.72, 6.57 g/kg; and WF: 6.49, 6.52, 6.37 g/kg. Soil temperature was the main determinant of soil respiration rates. We conclude that WS rotation resulted in lower soil respiration, WM rotation resulted in a higher soil carbon sequestration potential, and WF rotation resulted in higher soil water content. However, continued, long-term monitoring is needed to confirm the effect of rotations and straw retention on soil respiration and carbon sequestration in dryland cropping systems in northern China. Public Library of Science 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6756547/ /pubmed/31545801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253 Text en © 2019 Kong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kong, Dejie
Liu, Nana
Wang, Weiyu
Akhtar, Kashif
Li, Na
Ren, Guangxin
Feng, Yongzhong
Yang, Gaihe
Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title_full Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title_fullStr Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title_full_unstemmed Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title_short Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
title_sort soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253
work_keys_str_mv AT kongdejie soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT liunana soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT wangweiyu soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT akhtarkashif soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT lina soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT renguangxin soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT fengyongzhong soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments
AT yanggaihe soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments