Cargando…
Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments
Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253 |
_version_ | 1783453418812080128 |
---|---|
author | Kong, Dejie Liu, Nana Wang, Weiyu Akhtar, Kashif Li, Na Ren, Guangxin Feng, Yongzhong Yang, Gaihe |
author_facet | Kong, Dejie Liu, Nana Wang, Weiyu Akhtar, Kashif Li, Na Ren, Guangxin Feng, Yongzhong Yang, Gaihe |
author_sort | Kong, Dejie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm. We conducted a two-year field experiment with three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments in northwest China. The straw retention treatments included no straw retention (NS), retention of half the straw (HS), and retention of the total amount of straw (TS). The crop rotations treatments included winter wheat plus summer soybean (WS), winter wheat plus summer maize (WM), and winter wheat plus summer fallow (WF). Mean soil respiration rates under WS, WM, and WF treatments were 5.14, 6.53, and 5.49 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1); and 5.67, 5.47, and 6.03 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1) under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The mean soil water content were 15.50%, 15.57%, and 15.74% under WS, WM, and WF rotations, and 15.81%, 15.41%, and 15.50% under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration was higher with increased straw retention, and lower at deeper soil depths. Mean SOC concentrations under different rotations and straw treatments of TS, HS, and NS, respectively were as follows: WS: 6.91, 6.63, 6.39 g/kg; WM: 6.90, 6.72, 6.57 g/kg; and WF: 6.49, 6.52, 6.37 g/kg. Soil temperature was the main determinant of soil respiration rates. We conclude that WS rotation resulted in lower soil respiration, WM rotation resulted in a higher soil carbon sequestration potential, and WF rotation resulted in higher soil water content. However, continued, long-term monitoring is needed to confirm the effect of rotations and straw retention on soil respiration and carbon sequestration in dryland cropping systems in northern China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6756547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67565472019-10-04 Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments Kong, Dejie Liu, Nana Wang, Weiyu Akhtar, Kashif Li, Na Ren, Guangxin Feng, Yongzhong Yang, Gaihe PLoS One Research Article Straw retention is an effective method to conserve soil water content and improve soil carbon stocks. However, how soil carbon dynamics respond to different straw retention practices remains unclear. In this study, we investigated soil respiration and soil carbon sequestration at depths of 0–100 cm. We conducted a two-year field experiment with three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments in northwest China. The straw retention treatments included no straw retention (NS), retention of half the straw (HS), and retention of the total amount of straw (TS). The crop rotations treatments included winter wheat plus summer soybean (WS), winter wheat plus summer maize (WM), and winter wheat plus summer fallow (WF). Mean soil respiration rates under WS, WM, and WF treatments were 5.14, 6.53, and 5.49 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1); and 5.67, 5.47, and 6.03 μmol·m(-2)·s(-1) under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The mean soil water content were 15.50%, 15.57%, and 15.74% under WS, WM, and WF rotations, and 15.81%, 15.41%, and 15.50% under TS, HS, and NS treatments. The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration was higher with increased straw retention, and lower at deeper soil depths. Mean SOC concentrations under different rotations and straw treatments of TS, HS, and NS, respectively were as follows: WS: 6.91, 6.63, 6.39 g/kg; WM: 6.90, 6.72, 6.57 g/kg; and WF: 6.49, 6.52, 6.37 g/kg. Soil temperature was the main determinant of soil respiration rates. We conclude that WS rotation resulted in lower soil respiration, WM rotation resulted in a higher soil carbon sequestration potential, and WF rotation resulted in higher soil water content. However, continued, long-term monitoring is needed to confirm the effect of rotations and straw retention on soil respiration and carbon sequestration in dryland cropping systems in northern China. Public Library of Science 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6756547/ /pubmed/31545801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253 Text en © 2019 Kong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kong, Dejie Liu, Nana Wang, Weiyu Akhtar, Kashif Li, Na Ren, Guangxin Feng, Yongzhong Yang, Gaihe Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title | Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title_full | Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title_fullStr | Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title_short | Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
title_sort | soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kongdejie soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT liunana soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT wangweiyu soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT akhtarkashif soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT lina soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT renguangxin soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT fengyongzhong soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments AT yanggaihe soilrespirationfromfieldsunderthreecroprotationtreatmentsandthreestrawretentiontreatments |