Cargando…

The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques

This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe, Caesaron, Dino, Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751
_version_ 1783453419038572544
author Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
Caesaron, Dino
Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile
author_facet Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
Caesaron, Dino
Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile
author_sort Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
collection PubMed
description This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3.7 cm). Fourteen participants judged the positions of virtual targets presented at a distance of 90 cm from them by employing two different interaction techniques: the direct selection technique and the virtual cursor technique. The results showed overall higher accuracy with the virtual cursor technique than with the direct selection technique. It was also found that the target size significantly affected the frontal extent accuracy. In addition, significant interactions between technique and center-to-center target distance were observed. The direct selection technique was more accurate at the 18 cm center-to-center target distance along the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) axes, while the virtual cursor technique was more accurate for the 36 cm center-to-center target distance along the y axis. During the direct selection, estimations tended to converge to the center of the virtual space; however, this convergence was not observed in the virtual cursor condition. The accuracy of pointing estimations suffered on the left side of participants. These findings could provide direction for virtual reality developers in selecting proper interaction techniques and appropriately positioning virtual targets in stereoscopic environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67565482019-10-04 The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe Caesaron, Dino Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile PLoS One Research Article This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3.7 cm). Fourteen participants judged the positions of virtual targets presented at a distance of 90 cm from them by employing two different interaction techniques: the direct selection technique and the virtual cursor technique. The results showed overall higher accuracy with the virtual cursor technique than with the direct selection technique. It was also found that the target size significantly affected the frontal extent accuracy. In addition, significant interactions between technique and center-to-center target distance were observed. The direct selection technique was more accurate at the 18 cm center-to-center target distance along the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) axes, while the virtual cursor technique was more accurate for the 36 cm center-to-center target distance along the y axis. During the direct selection, estimations tended to converge to the center of the virtual space; however, this convergence was not observed in the virtual cursor condition. The accuracy of pointing estimations suffered on the left side of participants. These findings could provide direction for virtual reality developers in selecting proper interaction techniques and appropriately positioning virtual targets in stereoscopic environments. Public Library of Science 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6756548/ /pubmed/31545829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751 Text en © 2019 Lin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
Caesaron, Dino
Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile
The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title_full The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title_fullStr The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title_short The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
title_sort accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: a comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751
work_keys_str_mv AT linchiuhsiangjoe theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques
AT caesarondino theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques
AT woldegiorgisberekethaile theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques
AT linchiuhsiangjoe accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques
AT caesarondino accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques
AT woldegiorgisberekethaile accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques