Cargando…
The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques
This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751 |
_version_ | 1783453419038572544 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe Caesaron, Dino Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile |
author_facet | Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe Caesaron, Dino Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile |
author_sort | Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe |
collection | PubMed |
description | This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3.7 cm). Fourteen participants judged the positions of virtual targets presented at a distance of 90 cm from them by employing two different interaction techniques: the direct selection technique and the virtual cursor technique. The results showed overall higher accuracy with the virtual cursor technique than with the direct selection technique. It was also found that the target size significantly affected the frontal extent accuracy. In addition, significant interactions between technique and center-to-center target distance were observed. The direct selection technique was more accurate at the 18 cm center-to-center target distance along the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) axes, while the virtual cursor technique was more accurate for the 36 cm center-to-center target distance along the y axis. During the direct selection, estimations tended to converge to the center of the virtual space; however, this convergence was not observed in the virtual cursor condition. The accuracy of pointing estimations suffered on the left side of participants. These findings could provide direction for virtual reality developers in selecting proper interaction techniques and appropriately positioning virtual targets in stereoscopic environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6756548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67565482019-10-04 The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe Caesaron, Dino Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile PLoS One Research Article This experiment investigated the accuracy of distance judgment and perception of the frontal extent in a stereoscopic environment. Eight virtual targets were projected in a circular arrangement with two center-to-center target distances (18 cm and 36 cm) and three target sizes (0.6 cm, 1.5 cm, and 3.7 cm). Fourteen participants judged the positions of virtual targets presented at a distance of 90 cm from them by employing two different interaction techniques: the direct selection technique and the virtual cursor technique. The results showed overall higher accuracy with the virtual cursor technique than with the direct selection technique. It was also found that the target size significantly affected the frontal extent accuracy. In addition, significant interactions between technique and center-to-center target distance were observed. The direct selection technique was more accurate at the 18 cm center-to-center target distance along the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) axes, while the virtual cursor technique was more accurate for the 36 cm center-to-center target distance along the y axis. During the direct selection, estimations tended to converge to the center of the virtual space; however, this convergence was not observed in the virtual cursor condition. The accuracy of pointing estimations suffered on the left side of participants. These findings could provide direction for virtual reality developers in selecting proper interaction techniques and appropriately positioning virtual targets in stereoscopic environments. Public Library of Science 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6756548/ /pubmed/31545829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751 Text en © 2019 Lin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe Caesaron, Dino Woldegiorgis, Bereket Haile The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title | The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title_full | The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title_short | The accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: A comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
title_sort | accuracy of the frontal extent in stereoscopic environments: a comparison of direct selection and virtual cursor techniques |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31545829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linchiuhsiangjoe theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques AT caesarondino theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques AT woldegiorgisberekethaile theaccuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques AT linchiuhsiangjoe accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques AT caesarondino accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques AT woldegiorgisberekethaile accuracyofthefrontalextentinstereoscopicenvironmentsacomparisonofdirectselectionandvirtualcursortechniques |