Cargando…

Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)

INTRODUCTION: The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, Natasha, Coleman, Elizabeth, Watson, Judith, Bell, Kerry, McDaid, Catriona, Barnett, Cleveland, Twiste, Martin, Jepson, Fergus, Salawu, Abayomi, Harrison, Dennis, Vanicek, Natalie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924
_version_ 1783453427909525504
author Mitchell, Natasha
Coleman, Elizabeth
Watson, Judith
Bell, Kerry
McDaid, Catriona
Barnett, Cleveland
Twiste, Martin
Jepson, Fergus
Salawu, Abayomi
Harrison, Dennis
Vanicek, Natalie
author_facet Mitchell, Natasha
Coleman, Elizabeth
Watson, Judith
Bell, Kerry
McDaid, Catriona
Barnett, Cleveland
Twiste, Martin
Jepson, Fergus
Salawu, Abayomi
Harrison, Dennis
Vanicek, Natalie
author_sort Mitchell, Natasha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, possibly leading to longer term disuse. A Cochrane Review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. This trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthesis for older patients with vascular-related amputations and other health issues compared with a standard prosthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This feasibility trial is a pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard treatment with a more rigid prosthesis versus a self-aligning prosthesis. The target sample size is 90 patients, who are aged 50 years and over, and have a transtibial amputation, where amputation aetiology is mostly vascular-related or non-traumatic. Feasibility will be measured by consent and retention rates, a plausible future sample size over a 24-month recruitment period and completeness of outcome measures. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with trial participants to explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups with staff at prosthetics centres will explore barriers to successful delivery of the trial. Findings from the qualitative work will be integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes in order to inform the design of a full-scale RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by Yorkshire and the Humber—Leeds West Research Ethics Committee on 4 May 2018. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, articles in relevant newsletters, presentations at relevant conferences and the patient advisory group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15043643.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67566122019-10-07 Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study) Mitchell, Natasha Coleman, Elizabeth Watson, Judith Bell, Kerry McDaid, Catriona Barnett, Cleveland Twiste, Martin Jepson, Fergus Salawu, Abayomi Harrison, Dennis Vanicek, Natalie BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: The majority of older patients with a transtibial amputation are prescribed a standard (more rigid, not self-aligning) prosthesis. These are mostly suitable for level walking, and cannot adjust to different sloped surfaces. This makes walking more difficult and less energy efficient, possibly leading to longer term disuse. A Cochrane Review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any individual type of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism. This trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a self-aligning prosthesis for older patients with vascular-related amputations and other health issues compared with a standard prosthesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This feasibility trial is a pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing standard treatment with a more rigid prosthesis versus a self-aligning prosthesis. The target sample size is 90 patients, who are aged 50 years and over, and have a transtibial amputation, where amputation aetiology is mostly vascular-related or non-traumatic. Feasibility will be measured by consent and retention rates, a plausible future sample size over a 24-month recruitment period and completeness of outcome measures. Qualitative interviews will be carried out with trial participants to explore issues around study processes and acceptability of the intervention. Focus groups with staff at prosthetics centres will explore barriers to successful delivery of the trial. Findings from the qualitative work will be integrated with the feasibility trial outcomes in order to inform the design of a full-scale RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by Yorkshire and the Humber—Leeds West Research Ethics Committee on 4 May 2018. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed research publications, articles in relevant newsletters, presentations at relevant conferences and the patient advisory group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15043643. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6756612/ /pubmed/31542768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Mitchell, Natasha
Coleman, Elizabeth
Watson, Judith
Bell, Kerry
McDaid, Catriona
Barnett, Cleveland
Twiste, Martin
Jepson, Fergus
Salawu, Abayomi
Harrison, Dennis
Vanicek, Natalie
Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title_full Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title_fullStr Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title_full_unstemmed Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title_short Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study)
title_sort self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the stepforward study)
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31542768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032924
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellnatasha selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT colemanelizabeth selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT watsonjudith selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT bellkerry selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT mcdaidcatriona selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT barnettcleveland selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT twistemartin selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT jepsonfergus selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT salawuabayomi selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT harrisondennis selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy
AT vaniceknatalie selfaligningprostheticdeviceforolderpatientswithvascularrelatedamputationsprotocolforarandomisedfeasibilitystudythestepforwardstudy