Cargando…
Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348 |
_version_ | 1783453438940545024 |
---|---|
author | Begum, Husna Vishwanath, Swarna Merenda, Michelle Tacey, Mark Dean, Nicola Elder, Elisabeth Mureau, Marc Bezic, Ron Carter, Pamela Cooter, Rodney D. Deva, Anand Earnest, Arul Higgs, Michael Klein, Howard Magnusson, Mark Moore, Colin Rakhorst, Hinne Saunders, Christobel Stark, Birgit Hopper, Ingrid |
author_facet | Begum, Husna Vishwanath, Swarna Merenda, Michelle Tacey, Mark Dean, Nicola Elder, Elisabeth Mureau, Marc Bezic, Ron Carter, Pamela Cooter, Rodney D. Deva, Anand Earnest, Arul Higgs, Michael Klein, Howard Magnusson, Mark Moore, Colin Rakhorst, Hinne Saunders, Christobel Stark, Birgit Hopper, Ingrid |
author_sort | Begum, Husna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed: Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity. RESULTS: Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel: preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6756659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67566592019-10-07 Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking Begum, Husna Vishwanath, Swarna Merenda, Michelle Tacey, Mark Dean, Nicola Elder, Elisabeth Mureau, Marc Bezic, Ron Carter, Pamela Cooter, Rodney D. Deva, Anand Earnest, Arul Higgs, Michael Klein, Howard Magnusson, Mark Moore, Colin Rakhorst, Hinne Saunders, Christobel Stark, Birgit Hopper, Ingrid Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed: Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity. RESULTS: Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel: preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6756659/ /pubmed/31592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Begum, Husna Vishwanath, Swarna Merenda, Michelle Tacey, Mark Dean, Nicola Elder, Elisabeth Mureau, Marc Bezic, Ron Carter, Pamela Cooter, Rodney D. Deva, Anand Earnest, Arul Higgs, Michael Klein, Howard Magnusson, Mark Moore, Colin Rakhorst, Hinne Saunders, Christobel Stark, Birgit Hopper, Ingrid Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title | Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title_full | Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title_fullStr | Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title_short | Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking |
title_sort | defining quality indicators for breast device surgery: using registries for global benchmarking |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT begumhusna definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT vishwanathswarna definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT merendamichelle definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT taceymark definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT deannicola definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT elderelisabeth definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT mureaumarc definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT bezicron definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT carterpamela definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT cooterrodneyd definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT devaanand definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT earnestarul definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT higgsmichael definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT kleinhoward definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT magnussonmark definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT moorecolin definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT rakhorsthinne definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT saunderschristobel definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT starkbirgit definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking AT hopperingrid definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking |