Cargando…

Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking

Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begum, Husna, Vishwanath, Swarna, Merenda, Michelle, Tacey, Mark, Dean, Nicola, Elder, Elisabeth, Mureau, Marc, Bezic, Ron, Carter, Pamela, Cooter, Rodney D., Deva, Anand, Earnest, Arul, Higgs, Michael, Klein, Howard, Magnusson, Mark, Moore, Colin, Rakhorst, Hinne, Saunders, Christobel, Stark, Birgit, Hopper, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348
_version_ 1783453438940545024
author Begum, Husna
Vishwanath, Swarna
Merenda, Michelle
Tacey, Mark
Dean, Nicola
Elder, Elisabeth
Mureau, Marc
Bezic, Ron
Carter, Pamela
Cooter, Rodney D.
Deva, Anand
Earnest, Arul
Higgs, Michael
Klein, Howard
Magnusson, Mark
Moore, Colin
Rakhorst, Hinne
Saunders, Christobel
Stark, Birgit
Hopper, Ingrid
author_facet Begum, Husna
Vishwanath, Swarna
Merenda, Michelle
Tacey, Mark
Dean, Nicola
Elder, Elisabeth
Mureau, Marc
Bezic, Ron
Carter, Pamela
Cooter, Rodney D.
Deva, Anand
Earnest, Arul
Higgs, Michael
Klein, Howard
Magnusson, Mark
Moore, Colin
Rakhorst, Hinne
Saunders, Christobel
Stark, Birgit
Hopper, Ingrid
author_sort Begum, Husna
collection PubMed
description Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed: Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity. RESULTS: Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel: preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67566592019-10-07 Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking Begum, Husna Vishwanath, Swarna Merenda, Michelle Tacey, Mark Dean, Nicola Elder, Elisabeth Mureau, Marc Bezic, Ron Carter, Pamela Cooter, Rodney D. Deva, Anand Earnest, Arul Higgs, Michael Klein, Howard Magnusson, Mark Moore, Colin Rakhorst, Hinne Saunders, Christobel Stark, Birgit Hopper, Ingrid Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Breast device registries monitor devices encompassing breast implants, tissue expanders and dermal matrices, and the quality of care and patient outcomes for breast device surgery. Defining a standard set of quality indicators and risk adjustment factors will enable consistency and adjustment for case-mix in benchmarking quality of care across breast implant registries. This study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators to enable assessment and reporting of quality of care for breast device surgery which can be applied globally. METHODS: A scoping literature review was undertaken, and potential quality indicators were identified. Consensus on the final list of quality indicators was obtained using a modified Delphi approach. This process involved a series of online surveys, and teleconferences over 6 months. The Delphi panel included participants from various countries and representation from surgical specialty groups including breast and general surgeons, plastic and reconstructive surgeons, cosmetic surgeons, a breast-care nurse, a consumer, a devices regulator (Therapeutic Goods Administration), and a biostatistician. A total of 12 candidate indicators were proposed: Intraoperative antibiotic wash, intraoperative antiseptic wash, preoperative antibiotics, nipple shields, surgical plane, volume of implant, funnels, immediate versus delayed reconstruction, time to revision, reoperation due to complications, patient satisfaction, and volume of activity. RESULTS: Three of the 12 proposed indicators were endorsed by the panel: preoperative intravenous antibiotics, reoperation due to complication, and patient reported outcome measures. CONCLUSION: The 3 endorsed quality indicator measures will enable breast device registries to standardize benchmarking of care internationally for patients undergoing breast device surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6756659/ /pubmed/31592377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Begum, Husna
Vishwanath, Swarna
Merenda, Michelle
Tacey, Mark
Dean, Nicola
Elder, Elisabeth
Mureau, Marc
Bezic, Ron
Carter, Pamela
Cooter, Rodney D.
Deva, Anand
Earnest, Arul
Higgs, Michael
Klein, Howard
Magnusson, Mark
Moore, Colin
Rakhorst, Hinne
Saunders, Christobel
Stark, Birgit
Hopper, Ingrid
Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title_full Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title_fullStr Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title_full_unstemmed Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title_short Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking
title_sort defining quality indicators for breast device surgery: using registries for global benchmarking
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002348
work_keys_str_mv AT begumhusna definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT vishwanathswarna definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT merendamichelle definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT taceymark definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT deannicola definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT elderelisabeth definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT mureaumarc definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT bezicron definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT carterpamela definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT cooterrodneyd definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT devaanand definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT earnestarul definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT higgsmichael definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT kleinhoward definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT magnussonmark definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT moorecolin definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT rakhorsthinne definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT saunderschristobel definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT starkbirgit definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking
AT hopperingrid definingqualityindicatorsforbreastdevicesurgeryusingregistriesforglobalbenchmarking