Cargando…
Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must?
Rhinoplasty is a common and challenging procedure. Lateral osteotomy is routinely performed in most cases. Most of the surgeons have the habit of applying external nasal splints to stabilize the nasal tissues and bone in their new position postrhinoplasty. These splints are widely used despite the a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002374 |
_version_ | 1783453441840906240 |
---|---|
author | Challita, Raymond Shouman, Mohamad Ghanime, George |
author_facet | Challita, Raymond Shouman, Mohamad Ghanime, George |
author_sort | Challita, Raymond |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rhinoplasty is a common and challenging procedure. Lateral osteotomy is routinely performed in most cases. Most of the surgeons have the habit of applying external nasal splints to stabilize the nasal tissues and bone in their new position postrhinoplasty. These splints are widely used despite the absence of any evidence supporting this practice. Moreover, these splints have a lot of disadvantages, so we conducted this study to evaluate the cosmetic result in their absence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed. Medical records of 211 patients operated on for rhinoplasty by the same surgeon from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed. All patients were operated using open technique. After surgery, a Steri-Strips dressing with an overlying layer of surgical tape was applied to the nose without the use of an external nasal splint. Most of the patients were followed up for 18 months. Complication rates, revision rates, and nasal bone widths were recorded. RESULTS: Complication rates and revision rates were as follows: skin infection 0.99%, skin necrosis 0.99%, and secondary revision 3.48%. Finally 79.60% of patients had a decrease in their nasal bone width postsurgery. CONCLUSION: Based on the present study, external nasal splinting postrhinoplasty should not be routinely used. Satisfactory cosmetic results can be obtained while avoiding the complications, cost, and bulky dressings associated with external splints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6756671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67566712019-10-07 Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? Challita, Raymond Shouman, Mohamad Ghanime, George Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article Rhinoplasty is a common and challenging procedure. Lateral osteotomy is routinely performed in most cases. Most of the surgeons have the habit of applying external nasal splints to stabilize the nasal tissues and bone in their new position postrhinoplasty. These splints are widely used despite the absence of any evidence supporting this practice. Moreover, these splints have a lot of disadvantages, so we conducted this study to evaluate the cosmetic result in their absence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed. Medical records of 211 patients operated on for rhinoplasty by the same surgeon from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed. All patients were operated using open technique. After surgery, a Steri-Strips dressing with an overlying layer of surgical tape was applied to the nose without the use of an external nasal splint. Most of the patients were followed up for 18 months. Complication rates, revision rates, and nasal bone widths were recorded. RESULTS: Complication rates and revision rates were as follows: skin infection 0.99%, skin necrosis 0.99%, and secondary revision 3.48%. Finally 79.60% of patients had a decrease in their nasal bone width postsurgery. CONCLUSION: Based on the present study, external nasal splinting postrhinoplasty should not be routinely used. Satisfactory cosmetic results can be obtained while avoiding the complications, cost, and bulky dressings associated with external splints. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6756671/ /pubmed/31592389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002374 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Challita, Raymond Shouman, Mohamad Ghanime, George Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title | Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title_full | Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title_fullStr | Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title_full_unstemmed | Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title_short | Rhinoplasty and External Nasal Splinting: Is It Really a Must? |
title_sort | rhinoplasty and external nasal splinting: is it really a must? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT challitaraymond rhinoplastyandexternalnasalsplintingisitreallyamust AT shoumanmohamad rhinoplastyandexternalnasalsplintingisitreallyamust AT ghanimegeorge rhinoplastyandexternalnasalsplintingisitreallyamust |