Cargando…

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study

To discuss the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach and provide data for evidence based medicine in the surgical treatment of renal tumor. The clinical data was documented and compared between robotic retroperitoneal partial nep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Ju, Zhang, Cheng, Zhou, Xiaochen, Wang, Gongxian, Fu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017263
_version_ 1783453453670940672
author Guo, Ju
Zhang, Cheng
Zhou, Xiaochen
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
author_facet Guo, Ju
Zhang, Cheng
Zhou, Xiaochen
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
author_sort Guo, Ju
collection PubMed
description To discuss the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach and provide data for evidence based medicine in the surgical treatment of renal tumor. The clinical data was documented and compared between robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with and without hilar occlusion (clamp group and off-clamp group) performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Six-months post-operative renal function was superior in the off-clamp group compared with clamp group, while long-term results remained to be elucidated. No significant difference in post-operative hospital stay was found between the 2 groups. Estimated blood loss in off-clamp group was significantly higher than clamp group, while no significant difference was found in transfusion rate. Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach is a safe and effective technique for the removal of renal tumor while the indication of surgery is strictly limited to small (<4 cm) and exophytic renal tumor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6756721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67567212019-10-07 Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study Guo, Ju Zhang, Cheng Zhou, Xiaochen Wang, Gongxian Fu, Bin Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 To discuss the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach and provide data for evidence based medicine in the surgical treatment of renal tumor. The clinical data was documented and compared between robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with and without hilar occlusion (clamp group and off-clamp group) performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. Six-months post-operative renal function was superior in the off-clamp group compared with clamp group, while long-term results remained to be elucidated. No significant difference in post-operative hospital stay was found between the 2 groups. Estimated blood loss in off-clamp group was significantly higher than clamp group, while no significant difference was found in transfusion rate. Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach is a safe and effective technique for the removal of renal tumor while the indication of surgery is strictly limited to small (<4 cm) and exophytic renal tumor. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6756721/ /pubmed/31568002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017263 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7300
Guo, Ju
Zhang, Cheng
Zhou, Xiaochen
Wang, Gongxian
Fu, Bin
Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title_full Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title_short Robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion VS classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective comparative study
title_sort robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion vs classic robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective comparative study
topic 7300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017263
work_keys_str_mv AT guoju robotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomywithouthilarocclusionvsclassicrobotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT zhangcheng robotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomywithouthilarocclusionvsclassicrobotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT zhouxiaochen robotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomywithouthilarocclusionvsclassicrobotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT wanggongxian robotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomywithouthilarocclusionvsclassicrobotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT fubin robotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomywithouthilarocclusionvsclassicrobotassistedretroperitoneallaparoscopicpartialnephrectomyaretrospectivecomparativestudy