Cargando…
Comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular optical coherence tomography-guided and angiography-guided stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials and systematic review: Retraction
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6756726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017379 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular optical coherence tomography-guided and angiography-guided stent implantation: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials and systematic review
por: Jiang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound guided versus angiography guided drug eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Zhang, Yao-Jun, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided rotational atherectomy for calcified coronary lesions
por: Teng, Weili, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A practical guide to optical coherence tomography angiography interpretation
por: Greig, Eugenia Custo, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Retraction: Honeycomb-like appearance on optical coherence tomography of the right coronary artery
Publicado: (2022)