Cargando…

Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood

The purpose of this study was to identify specific social–cognitive factors that may influence the likelihood of engaging in sexting, and potential positive and negative outcomes of such behaviors, in adults. We asked 244 adult participants (64.5% women) to complete a set of online measures reflecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodie, Zara P., Wilson, Claire, Scott, Graham G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w
_version_ 1783453498710425600
author Brodie, Zara P.
Wilson, Claire
Scott, Graham G.
author_facet Brodie, Zara P.
Wilson, Claire
Scott, Graham G.
author_sort Brodie, Zara P.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to identify specific social–cognitive factors that may influence the likelihood of engaging in sexting, and potential positive and negative outcomes of such behaviors, in adults. We asked 244 adult participants (64.5% women) to complete a set of online measures reflecting sexting engagement, social–cognitive factors (definitions, differential association, differential reinforcement, and imitation), and outcomes of sexting behavior (risky sexual behavior appraisal, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results showed that 77.6% of our sample had sexted. Sexting in the context of a romantic relationship was predicted by differential reinforcement and friend imitation, while positive definitions of sexting alone predicted sexting someone outside the context of a romantic relationship. This indicates that motivations for sexting engagement may be context specific in adulthood. Those who had sexted demonstrated significantly higher sexual satisfaction than those who had never sexted. However, sexting outside of a romantic relationship predicted reduced perceived risk and heightened perceived benefit of engaging in real-life risky sexual behaviors. This suggests there may be both positive and negative implications of sexting engagement in adulthood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6757024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67570242019-10-07 Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood Brodie, Zara P. Wilson, Claire Scott, Graham G. Arch Sex Behav Original Paper The purpose of this study was to identify specific social–cognitive factors that may influence the likelihood of engaging in sexting, and potential positive and negative outcomes of such behaviors, in adults. We asked 244 adult participants (64.5% women) to complete a set of online measures reflecting sexting engagement, social–cognitive factors (definitions, differential association, differential reinforcement, and imitation), and outcomes of sexting behavior (risky sexual behavior appraisal, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction). Results showed that 77.6% of our sample had sexted. Sexting in the context of a romantic relationship was predicted by differential reinforcement and friend imitation, while positive definitions of sexting alone predicted sexting someone outside the context of a romantic relationship. This indicates that motivations for sexting engagement may be context specific in adulthood. Those who had sexted demonstrated significantly higher sexual satisfaction than those who had never sexted. However, sexting outside of a romantic relationship predicted reduced perceived risk and heightened perceived benefit of engaging in real-life risky sexual behaviors. This suggests there may be both positive and negative implications of sexting engagement in adulthood. Springer US 2019-09-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6757024/ /pubmed/31502070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Brodie, Zara P.
Wilson, Claire
Scott, Graham G.
Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title_full Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title_fullStr Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title_full_unstemmed Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title_short Sextual Intercourse: Considering Social–Cognitive Predictors and Subsequent Outcomes of Sexting Behavior in Adulthood
title_sort sextual intercourse: considering social–cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behavior in adulthood
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w
work_keys_str_mv AT brodiezarap sextualintercourseconsideringsocialcognitivepredictorsandsubsequentoutcomesofsextingbehaviorinadulthood
AT wilsonclaire sextualintercourseconsideringsocialcognitivepredictorsandsubsequentoutcomesofsextingbehaviorinadulthood
AT scottgrahamg sextualintercourseconsideringsocialcognitivepredictorsandsubsequentoutcomesofsextingbehaviorinadulthood