Cargando…
A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308 |
_version_ | 1783453514863738880 |
---|---|
author | Terry, Stephanie A. Ribeiro, Gabriel O. Gruninger, Robert J. Chaves, Alex V. Beauchemin, Karen A. Okine, Erasmus McAllister, Tim A. |
author_facet | Terry, Stephanie A. Ribeiro, Gabriel O. Gruninger, Robert J. Chaves, Alex V. Beauchemin, Karen A. Okine, Erasmus McAllister, Tim A. |
author_sort | Terry, Stephanie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square using 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (565 ± 35 kg initial BW). The basal diet contained 60% barley silage, 35% barley grain and 5% mineral supplement with EB added at 0% (control), 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0% (DM basis). Each period lasted 28 days, consisting of 14 days adaptation and 14 days of measurements. Samples for profiling of the microbiome in rumen liquid, solids and feces were collected on d 15 before feeding. Rumen samples for fermentation characterization were taken at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h post feeding. Total collection of urine and feces was conducted from days 18 to 22. Heifers were housed in open-circuit respiratory chambers on days 26–28 to estimate CH(4) emissions. Ruminal pH was recorded at 1-min intervals during CH(4) measurements using indwelling pH loggers. Data were analyzed with the fixed effects of dietary treatment and random effects of square, heifer within square and period. Dry matter intake was similar across treatments (P = 0.21). Ammonia N concentration and protozoa counts responded quadratically (P = 0.01) to EB in which both were decreased by EB included at 0.5 and 1.0%, compared to the control and 2.0% EB. Minimum pH was increased (P = 0.04), and variation of pH was decreased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB. Total tract digestibility, N balance and CH(4) production were not affected (P ≥ 0.17) by EB. Enhanced biochar decreased the relative abundance of Fibrobacter (P = 0.05) and Tenericutes (P = 0.01), and increased the relative abundance of Spirochaetaes (P = 0.01), Verrucomicrobia (P = 0.02), and Elusimicrobia (P = 0.02). Results suggest that at the examined concentrations, EB was ineffective at decreasing enteric CH(4) emissions, but did alter specific rumen microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6757094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67570942019-10-11 A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota Terry, Stephanie A. Ribeiro, Gabriel O. Gruninger, Robert J. Chaves, Alex V. Beauchemin, Karen A. Okine, Erasmus McAllister, Tim A. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square using 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (565 ± 35 kg initial BW). The basal diet contained 60% barley silage, 35% barley grain and 5% mineral supplement with EB added at 0% (control), 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0% (DM basis). Each period lasted 28 days, consisting of 14 days adaptation and 14 days of measurements. Samples for profiling of the microbiome in rumen liquid, solids and feces were collected on d 15 before feeding. Rumen samples for fermentation characterization were taken at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h post feeding. Total collection of urine and feces was conducted from days 18 to 22. Heifers were housed in open-circuit respiratory chambers on days 26–28 to estimate CH(4) emissions. Ruminal pH was recorded at 1-min intervals during CH(4) measurements using indwelling pH loggers. Data were analyzed with the fixed effects of dietary treatment and random effects of square, heifer within square and period. Dry matter intake was similar across treatments (P = 0.21). Ammonia N concentration and protozoa counts responded quadratically (P = 0.01) to EB in which both were decreased by EB included at 0.5 and 1.0%, compared to the control and 2.0% EB. Minimum pH was increased (P = 0.04), and variation of pH was decreased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB. Total tract digestibility, N balance and CH(4) production were not affected (P ≥ 0.17) by EB. Enhanced biochar decreased the relative abundance of Fibrobacter (P = 0.05) and Tenericutes (P = 0.01), and increased the relative abundance of Spirochaetaes (P = 0.01), Verrucomicrobia (P = 0.02), and Elusimicrobia (P = 0.02). Results suggest that at the examined concentrations, EB was ineffective at decreasing enteric CH(4) emissions, but did alter specific rumen microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6757094/ /pubmed/31608292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308 Text en Copyright © 2019 Terry, Ribeiro, Gruninger, Chaves, Beauchemin, Okine and McAllister. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Terry, Stephanie A. Ribeiro, Gabriel O. Gruninger, Robert J. Chaves, Alex V. Beauchemin, Karen A. Okine, Erasmus McAllister, Tim A. A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title | A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title_full | A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title_fullStr | A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title_full_unstemmed | A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title_short | A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota |
title_sort | pine enhanced biochar does not decrease enteric ch(4) emissions, but alters the rumen microbiota |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terrystephaniea apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT ribeirogabrielo apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT gruningerrobertj apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT chavesalexv apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT beaucheminkarena apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT okineerasmus apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT mcallistertima apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT terrystephaniea pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT ribeirogabrielo pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT gruningerrobertj pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT chavesalexv pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT beaucheminkarena pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT okineerasmus pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota AT mcallistertima pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota |