Cargando…

A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terry, Stephanie A., Ribeiro, Gabriel O., Gruninger, Robert J., Chaves, Alex V., Beauchemin, Karen A., Okine, Erasmus, McAllister, Tim A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308
_version_ 1783453514863738880
author Terry, Stephanie A.
Ribeiro, Gabriel O.
Gruninger, Robert J.
Chaves, Alex V.
Beauchemin, Karen A.
Okine, Erasmus
McAllister, Tim A.
author_facet Terry, Stephanie A.
Ribeiro, Gabriel O.
Gruninger, Robert J.
Chaves, Alex V.
Beauchemin, Karen A.
Okine, Erasmus
McAllister, Tim A.
author_sort Terry, Stephanie A.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square using 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (565 ± 35 kg initial BW). The basal diet contained 60% barley silage, 35% barley grain and 5% mineral supplement with EB added at 0% (control), 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0% (DM basis). Each period lasted 28 days, consisting of 14 days adaptation and 14 days of measurements. Samples for profiling of the microbiome in rumen liquid, solids and feces were collected on d 15 before feeding. Rumen samples for fermentation characterization were taken at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h post feeding. Total collection of urine and feces was conducted from days 18 to 22. Heifers were housed in open-circuit respiratory chambers on days 26–28 to estimate CH(4) emissions. Ruminal pH was recorded at 1-min intervals during CH(4) measurements using indwelling pH loggers. Data were analyzed with the fixed effects of dietary treatment and random effects of square, heifer within square and period. Dry matter intake was similar across treatments (P = 0.21). Ammonia N concentration and protozoa counts responded quadratically (P = 0.01) to EB in which both were decreased by EB included at 0.5 and 1.0%, compared to the control and 2.0% EB. Minimum pH was increased (P = 0.04), and variation of pH was decreased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB. Total tract digestibility, N balance and CH(4) production were not affected (P ≥ 0.17) by EB. Enhanced biochar decreased the relative abundance of Fibrobacter (P = 0.05) and Tenericutes (P = 0.01), and increased the relative abundance of Spirochaetaes (P = 0.01), Verrucomicrobia (P = 0.02), and Elusimicrobia (P = 0.02). Results suggest that at the examined concentrations, EB was ineffective at decreasing enteric CH(4) emissions, but did alter specific rumen microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6757094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67570942019-10-11 A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota Terry, Stephanie A. Ribeiro, Gabriel O. Gruninger, Robert J. Chaves, Alex V. Beauchemin, Karen A. Okine, Erasmus McAllister, Tim A. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a pine enhanced biochar (EB) on rumen fermentation, apparent total tract digestibility, methane (CH(4)) emissions, and the rumen and fecal microbiome of Angus × Hereford heifers fed a barley silage-based diet. The experiment was a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square using 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (565 ± 35 kg initial BW). The basal diet contained 60% barley silage, 35% barley grain and 5% mineral supplement with EB added at 0% (control), 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0% (DM basis). Each period lasted 28 days, consisting of 14 days adaptation and 14 days of measurements. Samples for profiling of the microbiome in rumen liquid, solids and feces were collected on d 15 before feeding. Rumen samples for fermentation characterization were taken at 0, 3, 6, and 12 h post feeding. Total collection of urine and feces was conducted from days 18 to 22. Heifers were housed in open-circuit respiratory chambers on days 26–28 to estimate CH(4) emissions. Ruminal pH was recorded at 1-min intervals during CH(4) measurements using indwelling pH loggers. Data were analyzed with the fixed effects of dietary treatment and random effects of square, heifer within square and period. Dry matter intake was similar across treatments (P = 0.21). Ammonia N concentration and protozoa counts responded quadratically (P = 0.01) to EB in which both were decreased by EB included at 0.5 and 1.0%, compared to the control and 2.0% EB. Minimum pH was increased (P = 0.04), and variation of pH was decreased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB. Total tract digestibility, N balance and CH(4) production were not affected (P ≥ 0.17) by EB. Enhanced biochar decreased the relative abundance of Fibrobacter (P = 0.05) and Tenericutes (P = 0.01), and increased the relative abundance of Spirochaetaes (P = 0.01), Verrucomicrobia (P = 0.02), and Elusimicrobia (P = 0.02). Results suggest that at the examined concentrations, EB was ineffective at decreasing enteric CH(4) emissions, but did alter specific rumen microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6757094/ /pubmed/31608292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308 Text en Copyright © 2019 Terry, Ribeiro, Gruninger, Chaves, Beauchemin, Okine and McAllister. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Terry, Stephanie A.
Ribeiro, Gabriel O.
Gruninger, Robert J.
Chaves, Alex V.
Beauchemin, Karen A.
Okine, Erasmus
McAllister, Tim A.
A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title_full A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title_fullStr A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title_full_unstemmed A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title_short A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH(4) Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota
title_sort pine enhanced biochar does not decrease enteric ch(4) emissions, but alters the rumen microbiota
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00308
work_keys_str_mv AT terrystephaniea apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT ribeirogabrielo apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT gruningerrobertj apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT chavesalexv apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT beaucheminkarena apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT okineerasmus apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT mcallistertima apineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT terrystephaniea pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT ribeirogabrielo pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT gruningerrobertj pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT chavesalexv pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT beaucheminkarena pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT okineerasmus pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota
AT mcallistertima pineenhancedbiochardoesnotdecreaseentericch4emissionsbutalterstherumenmicrobiota