Cargando…

In vivo and in vitro toxicity evaluation of liposome-encapsulated sirolimus

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of a new formulation of liposome-encapsulated sirolimus (LES). METHODS: In vitro experiments were done using ARPE-19 and HRP cells. An MTT assay was used to determine cell metabolic activity and a TUNEL assay for detecting DNA fragmentation....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abud, Murilo Batista, Louzada, Ricardo Noguera, Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel, Souza, Leonardo Gomes, dos Reis, Ricardo Gomes, Lima, Eliana Martins, de Ávila, Marcos Pereira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-019-0186-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of a new formulation of liposome-encapsulated sirolimus (LES). METHODS: In vitro experiments were done using ARPE-19 and HRP cells. An MTT assay was used to determine cell metabolic activity and a TUNEL assay for detecting DNA fragmentation. In vivo experiments were conducted on New Zealand albino rabbits that received intravitreal injections of empty liposomes (EL) or different concentrations of LES. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on the rabbit’s eyes following injection. RESULTS: Eighteen eyes of nine rabbits were used. MTT assay cell viability was 95.04% in group 1 (12.5 µL/mL LES). 92.95% in group 2 (25 µL/mL LES), 91.59% in group 3 (50 µL/mL LES), 98.09% in group 4 (12.5 µL/mL EL), 95.20% on group 5 (50 µL/mL EL), 98.53% in group 6 (50 µL/mL EL), and 2.84% on group 8 (50 µL/mL DMSO). There was no statistically significant difference among groups 1 to 7 in cell viability (p = 1.0), but the comparison of all groups with group 8 was significant (p < 0.0001). The TUNEL assay comparing two groups was not statistically significant from groups 1 to 7 (p = 1.0). The difference between groups 1 to 7 and group 8 (p < 0.0001) was significant. Histopathological changes were not found in any group. No activation of Müller cells was detected. CONCLUSION: A novel formulation of LES delivered intravitreally did not cause in vitro toxicity, as evaluated by MTT and TUNEL assays, nor in vivo toxicity as evaluated by histopathology and immunohistochemistry in rabbit eyes.