Cargando…
A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7 |
_version_ | 1783453570676293632 |
---|---|
author | Hayakawa, Norika Tanaka, Satoshi Hirata, Naoko Ogino, Sachiko Ozaki, Norio |
author_facet | Hayakawa, Norika Tanaka, Satoshi Hirata, Naoko Ogino, Sachiko Ozaki, Norio |
author_sort | Hayakawa, Norika |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administered questionnaires (SAQs) were examined to detect eating disorders in new college students. RESULTS: An anonymous questionnaire (EAT-26) was provided to 7738 new students; 4552 (58.8%) responders were included in the final analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for 131 (1.7%) students. Among them, 6 students showed a high EAT-26 score, but were not diagnosed with an eating disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Three students were diagnosed with an eating disorder using SCID-I, but their EAT-26 scores were below the threshold. From these results, in a non-clinical population, findings on EAT-26 do not agree with those on SCID-I in terms of the diagnosis of eating disorders, and this battery is not appropriate for detecting eating disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6757401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67574012019-09-30 A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students Hayakawa, Norika Tanaka, Satoshi Hirata, Naoko Ogino, Sachiko Ozaki, Norio BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administered questionnaires (SAQs) were examined to detect eating disorders in new college students. RESULTS: An anonymous questionnaire (EAT-26) was provided to 7738 new students; 4552 (58.8%) responders were included in the final analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for 131 (1.7%) students. Among them, 6 students showed a high EAT-26 score, but were not diagnosed with an eating disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Three students were diagnosed with an eating disorder using SCID-I, but their EAT-26 scores were below the threshold. From these results, in a non-clinical population, findings on EAT-26 do not agree with those on SCID-I in terms of the diagnosis of eating disorders, and this battery is not appropriate for detecting eating disorders. BioMed Central 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6757401/ /pubmed/31547866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Hayakawa, Norika Tanaka, Satoshi Hirata, Naoko Ogino, Sachiko Ozaki, Norio A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title | A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title_full | A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title_fullStr | A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title_full_unstemmed | A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title_short | A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
title_sort | battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayakawanorika abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT tanakasatoshi abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT hiratanaoko abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT oginosachiko abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT ozakinorio abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT hayakawanorika batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT tanakasatoshi batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT hiratanaoko batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT oginosachiko batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents AT ozakinorio batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents |