Cargando…

A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students

OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayakawa, Norika, Tanaka, Satoshi, Hirata, Naoko, Ogino, Sachiko, Ozaki, Norio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7
_version_ 1783453570676293632
author Hayakawa, Norika
Tanaka, Satoshi
Hirata, Naoko
Ogino, Sachiko
Ozaki, Norio
author_facet Hayakawa, Norika
Tanaka, Satoshi
Hirata, Naoko
Ogino, Sachiko
Ozaki, Norio
author_sort Hayakawa, Norika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administered questionnaires (SAQs) were examined to detect eating disorders in new college students. RESULTS: An anonymous questionnaire (EAT-26) was provided to 7738 new students; 4552 (58.8%) responders were included in the final analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for 131 (1.7%) students. Among them, 6 students showed a high EAT-26 score, but were not diagnosed with an eating disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Three students were diagnosed with an eating disorder using SCID-I, but their EAT-26 scores were below the threshold. From these results, in a non-clinical population, findings on EAT-26 do not agree with those on SCID-I in terms of the diagnosis of eating disorders, and this battery is not appropriate for detecting eating disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6757401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67574012019-09-30 A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students Hayakawa, Norika Tanaka, Satoshi Hirata, Naoko Ogino, Sachiko Ozaki, Norio BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Although studies have shown inconsistent results in terms of prevalence of eating disorders, the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) was used to screen students for abnormal eating behaviors. The results of the self-reported EAT-26 and body frame, as well as the efficacy of using self-administered questionnaires (SAQs) were examined to detect eating disorders in new college students. RESULTS: An anonymous questionnaire (EAT-26) was provided to 7738 new students; 4552 (58.8%) responders were included in the final analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for 131 (1.7%) students. Among them, 6 students showed a high EAT-26 score, but were not diagnosed with an eating disorder based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Three students were diagnosed with an eating disorder using SCID-I, but their EAT-26 scores were below the threshold. From these results, in a non-clinical population, findings on EAT-26 do not agree with those on SCID-I in terms of the diagnosis of eating disorders, and this battery is not appropriate for detecting eating disorders. BioMed Central 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6757401/ /pubmed/31547866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Hayakawa, Norika
Tanaka, Satoshi
Hirata, Naoko
Ogino, Sachiko
Ozaki, Norio
A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title_full A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title_fullStr A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title_full_unstemmed A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title_short A battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
title_sort battery of self-screening instruments and self-reported body frame could not detect eating disorders among college students
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31547866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4672-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hayakawanorika abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT tanakasatoshi abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT hiratanaoko abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT oginosachiko abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT ozakinorio abatteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT hayakawanorika batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT tanakasatoshi batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT hiratanaoko batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT oginosachiko batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents
AT ozakinorio batteryofselfscreeninginstrumentsandselfreportedbodyframecouldnotdetecteatingdisordersamongcollegestudents