Cargando…
Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To ach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695 |
_version_ | 1783453598569463808 |
---|---|
author | Laflamme, L. Chipps, J. Fangerau, H. Juth, N. Légaré, F. Sawe, H. R. Wallis, L. |
author_facet | Laflamme, L. Chipps, J. Fangerau, H. Juth, N. Légaré, F. Sawe, H. R. Wallis, L. |
author_sort | Laflamme, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support. Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread. Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synthesis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the development, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle. Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle. Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance. They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard of autonomy, safety and justice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6758631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67586312019-10-09 Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition Laflamme, L. Chipps, J. Fangerau, H. Juth, N. Légaré, F. Sawe, H. R. Wallis, L. Glob Health Action Original Article Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support. Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread. Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synthesis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the development, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle. Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle. Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance. They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard of autonomy, safety and justice. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6758631/ /pubmed/31532350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Laflamme, L. Chipps, J. Fangerau, H. Juth, N. Légaré, F. Sawe, H. R. Wallis, L. Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title | Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title_full | Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title_fullStr | Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title_short | Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition |
title_sort | targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the brocher proposition |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laflammel targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT chippsj targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT fangerauh targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT juthn targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT legaref targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT sawehr targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition AT wallisl targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition |