Cargando…

Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition

Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To ach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laflamme, L., Chipps, J., Fangerau, H., Juth, N., Légaré, F., Sawe, H. R., Wallis, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695
_version_ 1783453598569463808
author Laflamme, L.
Chipps, J.
Fangerau, H.
Juth, N.
Légaré, F.
Sawe, H. R.
Wallis, L.
author_facet Laflamme, L.
Chipps, J.
Fangerau, H.
Juth, N.
Légaré, F.
Sawe, H. R.
Wallis, L.
author_sort Laflamme, L.
collection PubMed
description Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support. Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread. Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synthesis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the development, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle. Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle. Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance. They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard of autonomy, safety and justice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6758631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67586312019-10-09 Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition Laflamme, L. Chipps, J. Fangerau, H. Juth, N. Légaré, F. Sawe, H. R. Wallis, L. Glob Health Action Original Article Background: mHealth applications assist workflow, help move towards equitable access to care, and facilitate care delivery. They have great potential to impact care in low-resource countries, but have significant ethical concerns pertaining to patient autonomy, safety, and justice. Objective: To achieve consensus among stakeholders on how to address concerns pertaining to autonomy, safety, and justice among mHealth developers and users in low-resource settings, in particular for the application of image-based consultation for diagnostic support. Methods: A consensus approach was taken during a three-day workshop using a purposive sample of global mHealth stakeholders (n = 27) professionally and geographically spread. Throughout a series of introductory talks, group brainstorming, plenary reviews, and synthesis by the moderators, lists of actions were generated that address the concerns engendered by mHealth applications on autonomy, justice and safety, taking into account the development, implementation, and scale-up phases of an mHealth application lifecycle. Results: Several types of actions were recommended; key ones among them included building in risk mitigation measures from the development stage, establishing inclusive consultation processes, using open sources platform whenever possible, training all clinical users, and bearing in mind that the gold standard of care is face-to-face consultation with the patient. Recommendations of patient, community and health system participation and of governance were identified as cutting across the mHealth lifecycle. Conclusion: Priorities agreed-upon at the meeting echo those put forward concerning other domains and locations of application of mHealth. Those more forcefully articulated are the need to adopt and maintain participatory processes as well as promoting self-governance. They are expected to cut across the mHealth lifecycle and are prerequisites to the safeguard of autonomy, safety and justice. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6758631/ /pubmed/31532350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Laflamme, L.
Chipps, J.
Fangerau, H.
Juth, N.
Légaré, F.
Sawe, H. R.
Wallis, L.
Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title_full Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title_fullStr Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title_full_unstemmed Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title_short Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition
title_sort targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the brocher proposition
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1666695
work_keys_str_mv AT laflammel targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT chippsj targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT fangerauh targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT juthn targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT legaref targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT sawehr targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition
AT wallisl targetingethicalconsiderationstiedtoimagebasedmobilehealthdiagnosticsupportspecifictocliniciansinlowresourcesettingsthebrocherproposition