Cargando…

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature

Surgical site infection and other common surgical site complications (dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma formation) can lead to serious and often life-threatening complications. Gauze, adhesive dressings, and skin adhesives have traditionally been utilized for incision management. However, the applica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandez, Luis G, Matthews, Marc R, Sibaja Alvarez, Pablo, Norwood, Scott, Villarreal, David H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565592
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5183
_version_ 1783453617415520256
author Fernandez, Luis G
Matthews, Marc R
Sibaja Alvarez, Pablo
Norwood, Scott
Villarreal, David H
author_facet Fernandez, Luis G
Matthews, Marc R
Sibaja Alvarez, Pablo
Norwood, Scott
Villarreal, David H
author_sort Fernandez, Luis G
collection PubMed
description Surgical site infection and other common surgical site complications (dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma formation) can lead to serious and often life-threatening complications. Gauze, adhesive dressings, and skin adhesives have traditionally been utilized for incision management. However, the application of negative pressure wound therapy over clean, closed surgical incisions (closed incision negative pressure therapy, ciNPT), has become a recent option for incision management. A brief review of ciNPT clinical evidence and health economic evidence are presented. A brief literature review was performed using available publication databases (PubMed, Ovid®, Embase®, and QUOSA™) for articles in English reporting on the use of ciNPT between October 1, 2016, to March 31, 2019. The successful application of ciNPT over clean, closed wounds has been reported in a broad spectrum of patients and operative interventions, resulting in favorable clinical results. Four of the five studies that examined health economics following the use of ciNPT reported a potential reduction in the cost of care. The authors’ own experience and published results suggest that patients at high risk for developing a surgical site complication may benefit from the use of ciNPT during the immediate postoperative period. Additional studies are needed across various surgical disciplines to further assess the safety, and cost-effectiveness of ciNPT use in patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6758976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67589762019-09-28 Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature Fernandez, Luis G Matthews, Marc R Sibaja Alvarez, Pablo Norwood, Scott Villarreal, David H Cureus Plastic Surgery Surgical site infection and other common surgical site complications (dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma formation) can lead to serious and often life-threatening complications. Gauze, adhesive dressings, and skin adhesives have traditionally been utilized for incision management. However, the application of negative pressure wound therapy over clean, closed surgical incisions (closed incision negative pressure therapy, ciNPT), has become a recent option for incision management. A brief review of ciNPT clinical evidence and health economic evidence are presented. A brief literature review was performed using available publication databases (PubMed, Ovid®, Embase®, and QUOSA™) for articles in English reporting on the use of ciNPT between October 1, 2016, to March 31, 2019. The successful application of ciNPT over clean, closed wounds has been reported in a broad spectrum of patients and operative interventions, resulting in favorable clinical results. Four of the five studies that examined health economics following the use of ciNPT reported a potential reduction in the cost of care. The authors’ own experience and published results suggest that patients at high risk for developing a surgical site complication may benefit from the use of ciNPT during the immediate postoperative period. Additional studies are needed across various surgical disciplines to further assess the safety, and cost-effectiveness of ciNPT use in patient populations. Cureus 2019-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6758976/ /pubmed/31565592 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5183 Text en Copyright © 2019, Fernandez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery
Fernandez, Luis G
Matthews, Marc R
Sibaja Alvarez, Pablo
Norwood, Scott
Villarreal, David H
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title_full Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title_short Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy: Review of the Literature
title_sort closed incision negative pressure therapy: review of the literature
topic Plastic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6758976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565592
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5183
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezluisg closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyreviewoftheliterature
AT matthewsmarcr closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyreviewoftheliterature
AT sibajaalvarezpablo closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyreviewoftheliterature
AT norwoodscott closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyreviewoftheliterature
AT villarrealdavidh closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyreviewoftheliterature