Cargando…

Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine

Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munch, Matthew M., Chambers, Laura C., Manhart, Lisa E., Domogala, Dan, Lopez, Anthony, Fredricks, David N., Srinivasan, Sujatha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962
_version_ 1783453671531479040
author Munch, Matthew M.
Chambers, Laura C.
Manhart, Lisa E.
Domogala, Dan
Lopez, Anthony
Fredricks, David N.
Srinivasan, Sujatha
author_facet Munch, Matthew M.
Chambers, Laura C.
Manhart, Lisa E.
Domogala, Dan
Lopez, Anthony
Fredricks, David N.
Srinivasan, Sujatha
author_sort Munch, Matthew M.
collection PubMed
description Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Furthermore, cold temperatures used to preserve DNA and bacteria in urine can promote precipitation of crystals that interfere with DNA extraction. Saline, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, or Tris-EDTA buffer were added to urine from adult men to determine if crystal precipitation could be reversed without heating samples beyond ambient temperature. Total bacterial DNA concentrations and PCR inhibition were measured using quantitative PCR assays to compare DNA yields with and without buffer addition. Dissolution of crystals with Tris-EDTA prior to urine centrifugation was most effective in increasing bacterial DNA recovery and reducing PCR inhibition. DNA recovery using Tris-EDTA was further tested by spiking urine with DNA from bacterial isolates and median concentrations of Lactobacillus jensenii and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene copies were found to be higher in urine processed with Tris-EDTA. Maximizing bacterial DNA yield from urine may facilitate more accurate assessment of bacterial populations and increase detection of specific bacteria in the genital tract.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67592792019-10-04 Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine Munch, Matthew M. Chambers, Laura C. Manhart, Lisa E. Domogala, Dan Lopez, Anthony Fredricks, David N. Srinivasan, Sujatha PLoS One Research Article Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Furthermore, cold temperatures used to preserve DNA and bacteria in urine can promote precipitation of crystals that interfere with DNA extraction. Saline, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, or Tris-EDTA buffer were added to urine from adult men to determine if crystal precipitation could be reversed without heating samples beyond ambient temperature. Total bacterial DNA concentrations and PCR inhibition were measured using quantitative PCR assays to compare DNA yields with and without buffer addition. Dissolution of crystals with Tris-EDTA prior to urine centrifugation was most effective in increasing bacterial DNA recovery and reducing PCR inhibition. DNA recovery using Tris-EDTA was further tested by spiking urine with DNA from bacterial isolates and median concentrations of Lactobacillus jensenii and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene copies were found to be higher in urine processed with Tris-EDTA. Maximizing bacterial DNA yield from urine may facilitate more accurate assessment of bacterial populations and increase detection of specific bacteria in the genital tract. Public Library of Science 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6759279/ /pubmed/31550285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962 Text en © 2019 Munch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munch, Matthew M.
Chambers, Laura C.
Manhart, Lisa E.
Domogala, Dan
Lopez, Anthony
Fredricks, David N.
Srinivasan, Sujatha
Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title_full Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title_fullStr Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title_short Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
title_sort optimizing bacterial dna extraction in urine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962
work_keys_str_mv AT munchmatthewm optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT chamberslaurac optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT manhartlisae optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT domogaladan optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT lopezanthony optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT fredricksdavidn optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine
AT srinivasansujatha optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine