Cargando…
Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine
Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Fu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962 |
_version_ | 1783453671531479040 |
---|---|
author | Munch, Matthew M. Chambers, Laura C. Manhart, Lisa E. Domogala, Dan Lopez, Anthony Fredricks, David N. Srinivasan, Sujatha |
author_facet | Munch, Matthew M. Chambers, Laura C. Manhart, Lisa E. Domogala, Dan Lopez, Anthony Fredricks, David N. Srinivasan, Sujatha |
author_sort | Munch, Matthew M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Furthermore, cold temperatures used to preserve DNA and bacteria in urine can promote precipitation of crystals that interfere with DNA extraction. Saline, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, or Tris-EDTA buffer were added to urine from adult men to determine if crystal precipitation could be reversed without heating samples beyond ambient temperature. Total bacterial DNA concentrations and PCR inhibition were measured using quantitative PCR assays to compare DNA yields with and without buffer addition. Dissolution of crystals with Tris-EDTA prior to urine centrifugation was most effective in increasing bacterial DNA recovery and reducing PCR inhibition. DNA recovery using Tris-EDTA was further tested by spiking urine with DNA from bacterial isolates and median concentrations of Lactobacillus jensenii and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene copies were found to be higher in urine processed with Tris-EDTA. Maximizing bacterial DNA yield from urine may facilitate more accurate assessment of bacterial populations and increase detection of specific bacteria in the genital tract. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6759279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67592792019-10-04 Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine Munch, Matthew M. Chambers, Laura C. Manhart, Lisa E. Domogala, Dan Lopez, Anthony Fredricks, David N. Srinivasan, Sujatha PLoS One Research Article Urine is an acceptable, non-invasive sample for investigating the human urogenital microbiota and for the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. However, low quantities of bacterial DNA and PCR inhibitors in urine may prevent efficient PCR amplification for molecular detection of bacteria. Furthermore, cold temperatures used to preserve DNA and bacteria in urine can promote precipitation of crystals that interfere with DNA extraction. Saline, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline, or Tris-EDTA buffer were added to urine from adult men to determine if crystal precipitation could be reversed without heating samples beyond ambient temperature. Total bacterial DNA concentrations and PCR inhibition were measured using quantitative PCR assays to compare DNA yields with and without buffer addition. Dissolution of crystals with Tris-EDTA prior to urine centrifugation was most effective in increasing bacterial DNA recovery and reducing PCR inhibition. DNA recovery using Tris-EDTA was further tested by spiking urine with DNA from bacterial isolates and median concentrations of Lactobacillus jensenii and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene copies were found to be higher in urine processed with Tris-EDTA. Maximizing bacterial DNA yield from urine may facilitate more accurate assessment of bacterial populations and increase detection of specific bacteria in the genital tract. Public Library of Science 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6759279/ /pubmed/31550285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962 Text en © 2019 Munch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Munch, Matthew M. Chambers, Laura C. Manhart, Lisa E. Domogala, Dan Lopez, Anthony Fredricks, David N. Srinivasan, Sujatha Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title | Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title_full | Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title_fullStr | Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title_short | Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine |
title_sort | optimizing bacterial dna extraction in urine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31550285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222962 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munchmatthewm optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT chamberslaurac optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT manhartlisae optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT domogaladan optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT lopezanthony optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT fredricksdavidn optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine AT srinivasansujatha optimizingbacterialdnaextractioninurine |