Cargando…
The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118 |
_version_ | 1783453730623979520 |
---|---|
author | Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. Hermans, Kevin C. M. Debets, Jacques Strzelecka, Agnieszka Leenders, Peter Vervoort-Peters, Lily Janssen, Ben J. A. Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs |
author_facet | Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. Hermans, Kevin C. M. Debets, Jacques Strzelecka, Agnieszka Leenders, Peter Vervoort-Peters, Lily Janssen, Ben J. A. Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs |
author_sort | Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the crucial role of Wnt/frizzled signaling in post-MI remodeling. In this overview, we provide the results of different studies aimed at confirming an initial study from our group, in which we observed beneficial effects of administration of a peptide fragment of Wnt5a, UM206, on infarct healing in a mouse MI model. Methods: Mice were subjected to permanent left coronary artery ligation, and treated with saline (control) or UM206, administered via osmotic minipumps. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements, while infarct size and myofibroblast content were characterized by (immuno)histochemistry. Results: In total, we performed seven follow-up studies, but we were unable to reproduce the beneficial effects of UM206 on infarct healing in most of them. Variations in dose and timing of UM206 administration, its manufacturer and the genetic background of the mice could not restore the phenotype. An in-depth analysis of the datasets revealed that the absence of effect of UM206 coincided with a lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and HF development in all experimental groups, irrespective of the treatment. Discussion: Irreproducibility of experimental observations is a major issue in biomedical sciences. It can arise from a relatively low number of experimental observations in the original study, a faulty hypothesis or a variation in the experimental model that cannot be controlled. In this case, the lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and lung weight increases in the follow-up studies point out to altered experimental conditions as the most likely explanation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6759626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67596262019-10-16 The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. Hermans, Kevin C. M. Debets, Jacques Strzelecka, Agnieszka Leenders, Peter Vervoort-Peters, Lily Janssen, Ben J. A. Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the crucial role of Wnt/frizzled signaling in post-MI remodeling. In this overview, we provide the results of different studies aimed at confirming an initial study from our group, in which we observed beneficial effects of administration of a peptide fragment of Wnt5a, UM206, on infarct healing in a mouse MI model. Methods: Mice were subjected to permanent left coronary artery ligation, and treated with saline (control) or UM206, administered via osmotic minipumps. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements, while infarct size and myofibroblast content were characterized by (immuno)histochemistry. Results: In total, we performed seven follow-up studies, but we were unable to reproduce the beneficial effects of UM206 on infarct healing in most of them. Variations in dose and timing of UM206 administration, its manufacturer and the genetic background of the mice could not restore the phenotype. An in-depth analysis of the datasets revealed that the absence of effect of UM206 coincided with a lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and HF development in all experimental groups, irrespective of the treatment. Discussion: Irreproducibility of experimental observations is a major issue in biomedical sciences. It can arise from a relatively low number of experimental observations in the original study, a faulty hypothesis or a variation in the experimental model that cannot be controlled. In this case, the lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and lung weight increases in the follow-up studies point out to altered experimental conditions as the most likely explanation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6759626/ /pubmed/31620445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118 Text en Copyright © 2019 Daskalopoulos, Hermans, Debets, Strzelecka, Leenders, Vervoort-Peters, Janssen and Blankesteijn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. Hermans, Kevin C. M. Debets, Jacques Strzelecka, Agnieszka Leenders, Peter Vervoort-Peters, Lily Janssen, Ben J. A. Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title | The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title_full | The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title_fullStr | The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title_short | The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments |
title_sort | beneficial effects of um206 on wound healing after myocardial infarction in mice are lost in follow-up experiments |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daskalopoulosevangelosp thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT hermanskevincm thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT debetsjacques thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT strzeleckaagnieszka thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT leenderspeter thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT vervoortpeterslily thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT janssenbenja thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT blankesteijnwmatthijs thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT daskalopoulosevangelosp beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT hermanskevincm beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT debetsjacques beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT strzeleckaagnieszka beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT leenderspeter beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT vervoortpeterslily beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT janssenbenja beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments AT blankesteijnwmatthijs beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments |