Cargando…

The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments

Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P., Hermans, Kevin C. M., Debets, Jacques, Strzelecka, Agnieszka, Leenders, Peter, Vervoort-Peters, Lily, Janssen, Ben J. A., Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118
_version_ 1783453730623979520
author Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P.
Hermans, Kevin C. M.
Debets, Jacques
Strzelecka, Agnieszka
Leenders, Peter
Vervoort-Peters, Lily
Janssen, Ben J. A.
Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs
author_facet Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P.
Hermans, Kevin C. M.
Debets, Jacques
Strzelecka, Agnieszka
Leenders, Peter
Vervoort-Peters, Lily
Janssen, Ben J. A.
Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs
author_sort Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the crucial role of Wnt/frizzled signaling in post-MI remodeling. In this overview, we provide the results of different studies aimed at confirming an initial study from our group, in which we observed beneficial effects of administration of a peptide fragment of Wnt5a, UM206, on infarct healing in a mouse MI model. Methods: Mice were subjected to permanent left coronary artery ligation, and treated with saline (control) or UM206, administered via osmotic minipumps. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements, while infarct size and myofibroblast content were characterized by (immuno)histochemistry. Results: In total, we performed seven follow-up studies, but we were unable to reproduce the beneficial effects of UM206 on infarct healing in most of them. Variations in dose and timing of UM206 administration, its manufacturer and the genetic background of the mice could not restore the phenotype. An in-depth analysis of the datasets revealed that the absence of effect of UM206 coincided with a lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and HF development in all experimental groups, irrespective of the treatment. Discussion: Irreproducibility of experimental observations is a major issue in biomedical sciences. It can arise from a relatively low number of experimental observations in the original study, a faulty hypothesis or a variation in the experimental model that cannot be controlled. In this case, the lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and lung weight increases in the follow-up studies point out to altered experimental conditions as the most likely explanation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67596262019-10-16 The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P. Hermans, Kevin C. M. Debets, Jacques Strzelecka, Agnieszka Leenders, Peter Vervoort-Peters, Lily Janssen, Ben J. A. Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Introduction: An inadequate wound healing following myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the main etiologies of heart failure (HF) development. Interventions aiming at improving this process may contribute to preserving cardiac function after MI. Our group, as well as others, have demonstrated the crucial role of Wnt/frizzled signaling in post-MI remodeling. In this overview, we provide the results of different studies aimed at confirming an initial study from our group, in which we observed beneficial effects of administration of a peptide fragment of Wnt5a, UM206, on infarct healing in a mouse MI model. Methods: Mice were subjected to permanent left coronary artery ligation, and treated with saline (control) or UM206, administered via osmotic minipumps. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and hemodynamic measurements, while infarct size and myofibroblast content were characterized by (immuno)histochemistry. Results: In total, we performed seven follow-up studies, but we were unable to reproduce the beneficial effects of UM206 on infarct healing in most of them. Variations in dose and timing of UM206 administration, its manufacturer and the genetic background of the mice could not restore the phenotype. An in-depth analysis of the datasets revealed that the absence of effect of UM206 coincided with a lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and HF development in all experimental groups, irrespective of the treatment. Discussion: Irreproducibility of experimental observations is a major issue in biomedical sciences. It can arise from a relatively low number of experimental observations in the original study, a faulty hypothesis or a variation in the experimental model that cannot be controlled. In this case, the lack of adverse cardiac remodeling and lung weight increases in the follow-up studies point out to altered experimental conditions as the most likely explanation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6759626/ /pubmed/31620445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118 Text en Copyright © 2019 Daskalopoulos, Hermans, Debets, Strzelecka, Leenders, Vervoort-Peters, Janssen and Blankesteijn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Daskalopoulos, Evangelos P.
Hermans, Kevin C. M.
Debets, Jacques
Strzelecka, Agnieszka
Leenders, Peter
Vervoort-Peters, Lily
Janssen, Ben J. A.
Blankesteijn, W. Matthijs
The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title_full The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title_fullStr The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title_full_unstemmed The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title_short The Beneficial Effects of UM206 on Wound Healing After Myocardial Infarction in Mice Are Lost in Follow-Up Experiments
title_sort beneficial effects of um206 on wound healing after myocardial infarction in mice are lost in follow-up experiments
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00118
work_keys_str_mv AT daskalopoulosevangelosp thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT hermanskevincm thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT debetsjacques thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT strzeleckaagnieszka thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT leenderspeter thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT vervoortpeterslily thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT janssenbenja thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT blankesteijnwmatthijs thebeneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT daskalopoulosevangelosp beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT hermanskevincm beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT debetsjacques beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT strzeleckaagnieszka beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT leenderspeter beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT vervoortpeterslily beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT janssenbenja beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments
AT blankesteijnwmatthijs beneficialeffectsofum206onwoundhealingaftermyocardialinfarctioninmicearelostinfollowupexperiments