Cargando…

MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?

Introduction: MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) increases overall prostate-cancer (PCa) detection-rates and decreases the risk of insignificant PCa detection. However, the impact of these findings on the definite pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) is under debate. Materials and Methods: Between 01/20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rührup, Jessica, Preisser, Felix, Theißen, Lena, Wenzel, Mike, Roos, Frederik C., Becker, Andreas, Kluth, Luis A., Bodelle, Boris, Köllermann, Jens, Chun, Felix K. H., Mandel, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00055
_version_ 1783453732458987520
author Rührup, Jessica
Preisser, Felix
Theißen, Lena
Wenzel, Mike
Roos, Frederik C.
Becker, Andreas
Kluth, Luis A.
Bodelle, Boris
Köllermann, Jens
Chun, Felix K. H.
Mandel, Philipp
author_facet Rührup, Jessica
Preisser, Felix
Theißen, Lena
Wenzel, Mike
Roos, Frederik C.
Becker, Andreas
Kluth, Luis A.
Bodelle, Boris
Köllermann, Jens
Chun, Felix K. H.
Mandel, Philipp
author_sort Rührup, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Introduction: MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) increases overall prostate-cancer (PCa) detection-rates and decreases the risk of insignificant PCa detection. However, the impact of these findings on the definite pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) is under debate. Materials and Methods: Between 01/2014 and 12/2018, 366 patients undergoing prostate biopsy and RP were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between biopsy Gleason-score (highest Gleason-score in a core) and the RP Gleason-score in patients undergoing systematic biopsy (SB-group) (n = 221) or TB+SB (TB-group, n = 145) was tested using the ISUP Gleason-group grading (GGG, scale 1–5). Sub analyses focused on biopsy GGG 1 and GGG ≥ 2. Results: Proportions of biopsy GGG 1–5 in the SB-group and TB-group were 24.4, 37.6, 19, 10.9, 8.1% and 13.8, 43.4, 24.2, 13.8, 4.8%, respectively (p = 0.07). Biopsy and pathologic GGG were concordant in 108 of 221 (48.9%) in SB- and 74 of 145 (51.1%) in TB-group (p = 0.8). Gleason upgrading was recorded in 33.5 and 31.7% in SB- vs. TB-group (p = 0.8). Patients with biopsy GGG 1 undergoing RP showed an upgrading in 68.5%(37/54) in SB- and 75%(15/20) in TB-group (p = 0.8). In patients with biopsy GGG ≥ 2 concordance increased for both biopsy approaches (54.5 vs. 55.2% for SB- vs. TB-group, p = 0.9). Discussion: Irrespective of differences in PCa detection-rates between TB- and SB-groups, no significant differences in GGG concordance and upgrading between patients of both groups undergoing biopsy, followed by RP, were recorded. Concordance rates increased in men with biopsy GGG ≥ 2. TB seems to detect more patients with PCa without a difference in concordance with final pathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67596342019-10-16 MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy? Rührup, Jessica Preisser, Felix Theißen, Lena Wenzel, Mike Roos, Frederik C. Becker, Andreas Kluth, Luis A. Bodelle, Boris Köllermann, Jens Chun, Felix K. H. Mandel, Philipp Front Surg Surgery Introduction: MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) increases overall prostate-cancer (PCa) detection-rates and decreases the risk of insignificant PCa detection. However, the impact of these findings on the definite pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) is under debate. Materials and Methods: Between 01/2014 and 12/2018, 366 patients undergoing prostate biopsy and RP were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between biopsy Gleason-score (highest Gleason-score in a core) and the RP Gleason-score in patients undergoing systematic biopsy (SB-group) (n = 221) or TB+SB (TB-group, n = 145) was tested using the ISUP Gleason-group grading (GGG, scale 1–5). Sub analyses focused on biopsy GGG 1 and GGG ≥ 2. Results: Proportions of biopsy GGG 1–5 in the SB-group and TB-group were 24.4, 37.6, 19, 10.9, 8.1% and 13.8, 43.4, 24.2, 13.8, 4.8%, respectively (p = 0.07). Biopsy and pathologic GGG were concordant in 108 of 221 (48.9%) in SB- and 74 of 145 (51.1%) in TB-group (p = 0.8). Gleason upgrading was recorded in 33.5 and 31.7% in SB- vs. TB-group (p = 0.8). Patients with biopsy GGG 1 undergoing RP showed an upgrading in 68.5%(37/54) in SB- and 75%(15/20) in TB-group (p = 0.8). In patients with biopsy GGG ≥ 2 concordance increased for both biopsy approaches (54.5 vs. 55.2% for SB- vs. TB-group, p = 0.9). Discussion: Irrespective of differences in PCa detection-rates between TB- and SB-groups, no significant differences in GGG concordance and upgrading between patients of both groups undergoing biopsy, followed by RP, were recorded. Concordance rates increased in men with biopsy GGG ≥ 2. TB seems to detect more patients with PCa without a difference in concordance with final pathology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6759634/ /pubmed/31620444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00055 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rührup, Preisser, Theißen, Wenzel, Roos, Becker, Kluth, Bodelle, Köllermann, Chun and Mandel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Rührup, Jessica
Preisser, Felix
Theißen, Lena
Wenzel, Mike
Roos, Frederik C.
Becker, Andreas
Kluth, Luis A.
Bodelle, Boris
Köllermann, Jens
Chun, Felix K. H.
Mandel, Philipp
MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title_full MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title_fullStr MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title_full_unstemmed MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title_short MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
title_sort mri-fusion targeted vs. systematic prostate biopsy–how does the biopsy technique affect gleason grade concordance and upgrading after radical prostatectomy?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2019.00055
work_keys_str_mv AT ruhrupjessica mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT preisserfelix mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT theißenlena mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wenzelmike mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT roosfrederikc mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT beckerandreas mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kluthluisa mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT bodelleboris mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT kollermannjens mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT chunfelixkh mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy
AT mandelphilipp mrifusiontargetedvssystematicprostatebiopsyhowdoesthebiopsytechniqueaffectgleasongradeconcordanceandupgradingafterradicalprostatectomy