Cargando…

Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The prevalence of neuropathic pain is estimated to be between 7 and 10% in the general population. The efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been studied by numerous clinical trials on patients with neuropathic pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Bo, Zhou, Xiayun, Zhou, Qinghe, Wang, Haiyan, Wang, Shougen, Luo, Kaitao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00954
_version_ 1783453758454235136
author Zhu, Bo
Zhou, Xiayun
Zhou, Qinghe
Wang, Haiyan
Wang, Shougen
Luo, Kaitao
author_facet Zhu, Bo
Zhou, Xiayun
Zhou, Qinghe
Wang, Haiyan
Wang, Shougen
Luo, Kaitao
author_sort Zhu, Bo
collection PubMed
description Background: The prevalence of neuropathic pain is estimated to be between 7 and 10% in the general population. The efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been studied by numerous clinical trials on patients with neuropathic pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine compared with a placebo for neuropathic pain and secondly to assess the safety of its administration. Methods: A literature search on PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google scholar databases was performed for relevant studies published up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IV lidocaine treatment for pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain were included. Results: 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients with varied etiology of neuropathic pain were among the patient samples of these studies. Fifteen articles were included for quantitative analysis. Lidocaine was superior to a placebo in relieving neuropathic pain in the early post-infusion period [Mean Difference (MD) = −11.9; 95% Confidence interval (CI): −16.8 to −7; p < 0.00001]. Multiple infusions of lidocaine over a period of 4 weeks, however, had no significant effect on reliving neuropathic pain (MD = −0.96; 95% CI: −2.02 to 0.11; p = 0.08). IV lidocaine was also associated with a significant number of adverse events compared to a placebo [Odds Ratio (OR) = 7.75; 95% CI: 3.18–18.92; p < 0.00001]. Conclusion: Our study indicates that while IV lidocaine is effective in pain control among patients with neuropathic pain in the immediate post-infusion period, it does not have a long-lasting, persistent effect. IV infusions of the drug are associated with an increased risk of side effects compared to a placebo. However, the risk of serious adverse events is negligible. Further, well-designed RCTs evaluating the effects of various dosages and infusion periods of IV lidocaine are required to provide clear guidelines on its clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67597692019-10-16 Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhu, Bo Zhou, Xiayun Zhou, Qinghe Wang, Haiyan Wang, Shougen Luo, Kaitao Front Neurol Neurology Background: The prevalence of neuropathic pain is estimated to be between 7 and 10% in the general population. The efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has been studied by numerous clinical trials on patients with neuropathic pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine compared with a placebo for neuropathic pain and secondly to assess the safety of its administration. Methods: A literature search on PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google scholar databases was performed for relevant studies published up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IV lidocaine treatment for pain relief in patients with neuropathic pain were included. Results: 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients with varied etiology of neuropathic pain were among the patient samples of these studies. Fifteen articles were included for quantitative analysis. Lidocaine was superior to a placebo in relieving neuropathic pain in the early post-infusion period [Mean Difference (MD) = −11.9; 95% Confidence interval (CI): −16.8 to −7; p < 0.00001]. Multiple infusions of lidocaine over a period of 4 weeks, however, had no significant effect on reliving neuropathic pain (MD = −0.96; 95% CI: −2.02 to 0.11; p = 0.08). IV lidocaine was also associated with a significant number of adverse events compared to a placebo [Odds Ratio (OR) = 7.75; 95% CI: 3.18–18.92; p < 0.00001]. Conclusion: Our study indicates that while IV lidocaine is effective in pain control among patients with neuropathic pain in the immediate post-infusion period, it does not have a long-lasting, persistent effect. IV infusions of the drug are associated with an increased risk of side effects compared to a placebo. However, the risk of serious adverse events is negligible. Further, well-designed RCTs evaluating the effects of various dosages and infusion periods of IV lidocaine are required to provide clear guidelines on its clinical use. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6759769/ /pubmed/31620064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00954 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zhu, Zhou, Zhou, Wang, Wang and Luo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Zhu, Bo
Zhou, Xiayun
Zhou, Qinghe
Wang, Haiyan
Wang, Shougen
Luo, Kaitao
Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort intra-venous lidocaine to relieve neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00954
work_keys_str_mv AT zhubo intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouxiayun intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouqinghe intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanghaiyan intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangshougen intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luokaitao intravenouslidocainetorelieveneuropathicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis