Cargando…

Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize

Genomic selection (GS), a tool developed for molecular breeding, is used by plant breeders to improve breeding efficacy by shortening the breeding cycle and to facilitate the selection of candidate lines for creating hybrids without phenotyping in various environments. Association and linkage mappin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiaogang, Wang, Hongwu, Hu, Xiaojiao, Li, Kun, Liu, Zhifang, Wu, Yujin, Huang, Changling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01129
_version_ 1783453761077772288
author Liu, Xiaogang
Wang, Hongwu
Hu, Xiaojiao
Li, Kun
Liu, Zhifang
Wu, Yujin
Huang, Changling
author_facet Liu, Xiaogang
Wang, Hongwu
Hu, Xiaojiao
Li, Kun
Liu, Zhifang
Wu, Yujin
Huang, Changling
author_sort Liu, Xiaogang
collection PubMed
description Genomic selection (GS), a tool developed for molecular breeding, is used by plant breeders to improve breeding efficacy by shortening the breeding cycle and to facilitate the selection of candidate lines for creating hybrids without phenotyping in various environments. Association and linkage mapping have been widely used to explore and detect candidate genes in order to understand the genetic mechanisms of quantitative traits. In the current study, phenotypic and genotypic data from three experimental populations, including data on six agronomic traits (e.g., plant height, ear height, ear length, ear diameter, grain yield per plant, and hundred-kernel weight), were used to evaluate the effect of trait-relevant markers (TRMs) on prediction accuracy estimation. Integrating information from mapping into a statistical model can efficiently improve prediction performance compared with using stochastically selected markers to perform GS. The prediction accuracy can reach plateau when a total of 500–1,000 TRMs are utilized in GS. The prediction accuracy can be significantly enhanced by including nonadditive effects and TRMs in the GS model when genotypic data with high proportions of heterozygous alleles and complex agronomic traits with high proportion of nonadditive variancein phenotypic variance are used to perform GS. In addition, taking information on population structure into account can slightly improve prediction performance when the genetic relationship between the training and testing sets is influenced by population stratification due to different allele frequencies. In conclusion, GS is a useful approach for prescreening candidate lines, and the empirical evidence provided by the current study for TRMs and nonadditive effects can inform plant breeding and in turn contribute to the improvement of selection efficiency in practical GS-assisted breeding programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67597802019-10-16 Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize Liu, Xiaogang Wang, Hongwu Hu, Xiaojiao Li, Kun Liu, Zhifang Wu, Yujin Huang, Changling Front Plant Sci Plant Science Genomic selection (GS), a tool developed for molecular breeding, is used by plant breeders to improve breeding efficacy by shortening the breeding cycle and to facilitate the selection of candidate lines for creating hybrids without phenotyping in various environments. Association and linkage mapping have been widely used to explore and detect candidate genes in order to understand the genetic mechanisms of quantitative traits. In the current study, phenotypic and genotypic data from three experimental populations, including data on six agronomic traits (e.g., plant height, ear height, ear length, ear diameter, grain yield per plant, and hundred-kernel weight), were used to evaluate the effect of trait-relevant markers (TRMs) on prediction accuracy estimation. Integrating information from mapping into a statistical model can efficiently improve prediction performance compared with using stochastically selected markers to perform GS. The prediction accuracy can reach plateau when a total of 500–1,000 TRMs are utilized in GS. The prediction accuracy can be significantly enhanced by including nonadditive effects and TRMs in the GS model when genotypic data with high proportions of heterozygous alleles and complex agronomic traits with high proportion of nonadditive variancein phenotypic variance are used to perform GS. In addition, taking information on population structure into account can slightly improve prediction performance when the genetic relationship between the training and testing sets is influenced by population stratification due to different allele frequencies. In conclusion, GS is a useful approach for prescreening candidate lines, and the empirical evidence provided by the current study for TRMs and nonadditive effects can inform plant breeding and in turn contribute to the improvement of selection efficiency in practical GS-assisted breeding programs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6759780/ /pubmed/31620155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01129 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liu, Wang, Hu, Li, Liu, Wu and Huang http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Liu, Xiaogang
Wang, Hongwu
Hu, Xiaojiao
Li, Kun
Liu, Zhifang
Wu, Yujin
Huang, Changling
Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title_full Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title_fullStr Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title_full_unstemmed Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title_short Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize
title_sort improving genomic selection with quantitative trait loci and nonadditive effects revealed by empirical evidence in maize
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01129
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaogang improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT wanghongwu improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT huxiaojiao improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT likun improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT liuzhifang improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT wuyujin improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize
AT huangchangling improvinggenomicselectionwithquantitativetraitlociandnonadditiveeffectsrevealedbyempiricalevidenceinmaize