Cargando…
Frequentist versus Bayesian approaches to multiple testing
Multiple tests arise frequently in epidemiologic research. However, the issue of multiplicity adjustment is surrounded by confusion and controversy, and there is no uniform agreement on whether or when adjustment is warranted. In this paper we compare frequentist and Bayesian frameworks for multiple...
Autores principales: | Sjölander, Arvid, Vansteelandt, Stijn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31087218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00517-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Authors’ reply to ‘Multiple comparisons controversies are about context and costs, not frequentism versus Bayesianism’
por: Sjölander, Arvid, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Bayesian versus frequentist upper limits
por: Rover, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A comparison of the Bayesian and frequentist approaches to estimation
por: Samaniego, Francisco J
Publicado: (2010) -
Introduction to Frequentist and Bayesian Fitting
por: James, F
Publicado: (2007) -
Bayesian and frequentist regression methods
por: Wakefield, Jon
Publicado: (2013)