Cargando…

Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Regan, Elizabeth W., Handlery, Reed, Beets, Michael W., Fritz, Stacy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761
_version_ 1783453779922780160
author Regan, Elizabeth W.
Handlery, Reed
Beets, Michael W.
Fritz, Stacy L.
author_facet Regan, Elizabeth W.
Handlery, Reed
Beets, Michael W.
Fritz, Stacy L.
author_sort Regan, Elizabeth W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited appropriate community programs. Lack of structured activity contributes to sedentary behavior. The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to review aerobic programs for stroke survivors similar in activity and dosage to cardiac rehabilitation programs to determine their efficacy for improving aerobic and walking capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to review 5 databases. Group interventions for survivors of stroke with a primary aerobic component and dosage from 18 to 36 visits over 8 to 18 weeks (matching cardiac rehabilitation requirements in the United States) were included. The 6‐minute walk test, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2) peak, and walking speed were included as measures of aerobic capacity. Summary effect sizes and outcome measure mean differences were calculated for preintervention to postintervention, and summary effect sizes were calculated for preintervention to follow‐up. Activity type and initial 6‐minute walk test moderator analyses were performed. Nineteen studies with 23 eligible groups were selected. Survivors of stroke improved their composite aerobic capacity with an effect size of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27–0.49). Studies including 6‐minute walk test demonstrated a pooled difference in means of 53.3 m (95% CI, 36.8–69.8 m). Follow‐up data were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of stroke benefit from aerobic programs with similar dosing to cardiac rehabilitation in the United States. The potential integration into existing programs could expand the community exercise options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67598932019-09-30 Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Regan, Elizabeth W. Handlery, Reed Beets, Michael W. Fritz, Stacy L. J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: Survivors of stroke face movement disability and increased cardiovascular disease and stroke risk. Treatment includes rehabilitation focused on functional movement with less emphasis on aerobic capacity. After rehabilitation, survivors of stroke must self‐manage activity with limited appropriate community programs. Lack of structured activity contributes to sedentary behavior. The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to review aerobic programs for stroke survivors similar in activity and dosage to cardiac rehabilitation programs to determine their efficacy for improving aerobic and walking capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to review 5 databases. Group interventions for survivors of stroke with a primary aerobic component and dosage from 18 to 36 visits over 8 to 18 weeks (matching cardiac rehabilitation requirements in the United States) were included. The 6‐minute walk test, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2) peak, and walking speed were included as measures of aerobic capacity. Summary effect sizes and outcome measure mean differences were calculated for preintervention to postintervention, and summary effect sizes were calculated for preintervention to follow‐up. Activity type and initial 6‐minute walk test moderator analyses were performed. Nineteen studies with 23 eligible groups were selected. Survivors of stroke improved their composite aerobic capacity with an effect size of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27–0.49). Studies including 6‐minute walk test demonstrated a pooled difference in means of 53.3 m (95% CI, 36.8–69.8 m). Follow‐up data were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of stroke benefit from aerobic programs with similar dosing to cardiac rehabilitation in the United States. The potential integration into existing programs could expand the community exercise options. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6759893/ /pubmed/31409176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Regan, Elizabeth W.
Handlery, Reed
Beets, Michael W.
Fritz, Stacy L.
Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Are Aerobic Programs Similar in Design to Cardiac Rehabilitation Beneficial for Survivors of Stroke? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort are aerobic programs similar in design to cardiac rehabilitation beneficial for survivors of stroke? a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012761
work_keys_str_mv AT reganelizabethw areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT handleryreed areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beetsmichaelw areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fritzstacyl areaerobicprogramssimilarindesigntocardiacrehabilitationbeneficialforsurvivorsofstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis