Cargando…

Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers

BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) is a highly effective technique for evaluation of fetuses with life‐threatening arrhythmia, but its dissemination has been constrained by the high cost and complexity of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) instrumentation. Optically pumped...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strand, Sarah, Lutter, William, Strasburger, Janette F., Shah, Vishal, Baffa, Oswaldo, Wakai, Ronald T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31394997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013436
_version_ 1783453785025150976
author Strand, Sarah
Lutter, William
Strasburger, Janette F.
Shah, Vishal
Baffa, Oswaldo
Wakai, Ronald T.
author_facet Strand, Sarah
Lutter, William
Strasburger, Janette F.
Shah, Vishal
Baffa, Oswaldo
Wakai, Ronald T.
author_sort Strand, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) is a highly effective technique for evaluation of fetuses with life‐threatening arrhythmia, but its dissemination has been constrained by the high cost and complexity of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) instrumentation. Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are a promising new technology that can replace SQUIDs for many applications. This study compares the performance of an fMCG system, utilizing OPMs operating in a person‐sized magnetic shield, to that of a conventional fMCG system, utilizing SQUID magnetometers operating in a magnetically shielded room. METHODS AND RESULTS: fMCG recordings were made in 24 subjects using the SQUID system with the mother lying supine in a magnetically shielded room and the OPM system with the mother lying prone in a person‐sized, cylindrical shield. Signal‐to‐noise ratios of the OPM and SQUID recordings were not statistically different and were adequate for diagnostic purposes with both technologies. Although the environmental noise was higher using the small open‐ended shield, this was offset by the higher signal amplitude achieved with prone positioning, which reduced the distance between the fetus and sensors and improved patient comfort. In several subjects, fMCG provided a differential diagnosis that was more precise and/or definitive than was possible with echocardiography alone. CONCLUSIONS: The OPM‐based system was portable, improved patient comfort, and performed as well as the SQUID‐based system at a small fraction of the cost. Electrophysiological assessment of fetal rhythm is now practical and will have a major impact on management of fetuses with long QT syndrome and other life‐threatening arrhythmias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6759914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67599142019-09-30 Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers Strand, Sarah Lutter, William Strasburger, Janette F. Shah, Vishal Baffa, Oswaldo Wakai, Ronald T. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) is a highly effective technique for evaluation of fetuses with life‐threatening arrhythmia, but its dissemination has been constrained by the high cost and complexity of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) instrumentation. Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) are a promising new technology that can replace SQUIDs for many applications. This study compares the performance of an fMCG system, utilizing OPMs operating in a person‐sized magnetic shield, to that of a conventional fMCG system, utilizing SQUID magnetometers operating in a magnetically shielded room. METHODS AND RESULTS: fMCG recordings were made in 24 subjects using the SQUID system with the mother lying supine in a magnetically shielded room and the OPM system with the mother lying prone in a person‐sized, cylindrical shield. Signal‐to‐noise ratios of the OPM and SQUID recordings were not statistically different and were adequate for diagnostic purposes with both technologies. Although the environmental noise was higher using the small open‐ended shield, this was offset by the higher signal amplitude achieved with prone positioning, which reduced the distance between the fetus and sensors and improved patient comfort. In several subjects, fMCG provided a differential diagnosis that was more precise and/or definitive than was possible with echocardiography alone. CONCLUSIONS: The OPM‐based system was portable, improved patient comfort, and performed as well as the SQUID‐based system at a small fraction of the cost. Electrophysiological assessment of fetal rhythm is now practical and will have a major impact on management of fetuses with long QT syndrome and other life‐threatening arrhythmias. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6759914/ /pubmed/31394997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013436 Text en © 2019 The Authors and QuSpin, Inc. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Strand, Sarah
Lutter, William
Strasburger, Janette F.
Shah, Vishal
Baffa, Oswaldo
Wakai, Ronald T.
Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title_full Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title_fullStr Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title_full_unstemmed Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title_short Low‐Cost Fetal Magnetocardiography: A Comparison of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device and Optically Pumped Magnetometers
title_sort low‐cost fetal magnetocardiography: a comparison of superconducting quantum interference device and optically pumped magnetometers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31394997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013436
work_keys_str_mv AT strandsarah lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers
AT lutterwilliam lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers
AT strasburgerjanettef lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers
AT shahvishal lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers
AT baffaoswaldo lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers
AT wakaironaldt lowcostfetalmagnetocardiographyacomparisonofsuperconductingquantuminterferencedeviceandopticallypumpedmagnetometers