Cargando…
The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration
Colonizing germ-free (GF) zebrafish with specific bacterial species provides the possibility of understanding the influence on host biological processes including gene expression, development, immunity, and behavioral responses. It also enlightens our understanding on the host-microbe interactions w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02156 |
_version_ | 1783453808854040576 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Fang Limbu, Samwel Mchele Qian, Ye Qiao, Fang Du, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Meiling |
author_facet | Tan, Fang Limbu, Samwel Mchele Qian, Ye Qiao, Fang Du, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Meiling |
author_sort | Tan, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colonizing germ-free (GF) zebrafish with specific bacterial species provides the possibility of understanding the influence on host biological processes including gene expression, development, immunity, and behavioral responses. It also enlightens our understanding on the host-microbe interactions within the physiological context of a living host. However, the responses of GF zebrafish to various colonization conditions such as bacterial concentrations, colonization time points, and exposure duration remain unclear. To address this issue, we explored the responses of GF zebrafish by using two bacterial species at varying concentrations, colonization time points and exposure duration. Therefore, we mono-associated GF zebrafish with Escherichia coli DH5α or Bacillus subtilis WB800N at concentrations ranging from 10(2) to 10(7) CFU/ml either at 3 day post fertilization (dpf) or 5 dpf for 24 or 48 h. We evaluated the responses of GF zebrafish by analyzing the survival rate, colonization efficiency, nutrients metabolism, intestinal cell proliferation, innate immunity, stress, and behavior responses by comparing it to conventionally raised zebrafish (CONR) and GF zebrafish. The results indicated that the final bacteria concentrations ranging from 10(2) to 10(4) CFU/ml did not cause any mortality when GF mono-associated larvae were exposed to either E. coli DH5α or B. subtilis WB800N at 3 or 5 dpf, while concentrations ranging from 10(6) to 10(7) CFU/ml increased the mortality, particularly for 5 dpf owing to the decrease in dissolved oxygen level. The E. coli DH5α mainly induced the expression of genes related to nutrients metabolism, cell proliferation and immunity, while B. subtilis WB800N mainly upregulated the expression of genes related to immunity and stress responses. Moreover, our data revealed that GF zebrafish showed higher levels of physical activity than CONR and the microbial colonization reduced the hyperactivity of GF zebrafish, suggesting colonization of bacteria affected behavior characteristics. This study provides useful information on bacterial colonization of GF zebrafish and the interaction between the host and microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6760068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67600682019-10-16 The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration Tan, Fang Limbu, Samwel Mchele Qian, Ye Qiao, Fang Du, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Meiling Front Microbiol Microbiology Colonizing germ-free (GF) zebrafish with specific bacterial species provides the possibility of understanding the influence on host biological processes including gene expression, development, immunity, and behavioral responses. It also enlightens our understanding on the host-microbe interactions within the physiological context of a living host. However, the responses of GF zebrafish to various colonization conditions such as bacterial concentrations, colonization time points, and exposure duration remain unclear. To address this issue, we explored the responses of GF zebrafish by using two bacterial species at varying concentrations, colonization time points and exposure duration. Therefore, we mono-associated GF zebrafish with Escherichia coli DH5α or Bacillus subtilis WB800N at concentrations ranging from 10(2) to 10(7) CFU/ml either at 3 day post fertilization (dpf) or 5 dpf for 24 or 48 h. We evaluated the responses of GF zebrafish by analyzing the survival rate, colonization efficiency, nutrients metabolism, intestinal cell proliferation, innate immunity, stress, and behavior responses by comparing it to conventionally raised zebrafish (CONR) and GF zebrafish. The results indicated that the final bacteria concentrations ranging from 10(2) to 10(4) CFU/ml did not cause any mortality when GF mono-associated larvae were exposed to either E. coli DH5α or B. subtilis WB800N at 3 or 5 dpf, while concentrations ranging from 10(6) to 10(7) CFU/ml increased the mortality, particularly for 5 dpf owing to the decrease in dissolved oxygen level. The E. coli DH5α mainly induced the expression of genes related to nutrients metabolism, cell proliferation and immunity, while B. subtilis WB800N mainly upregulated the expression of genes related to immunity and stress responses. Moreover, our data revealed that GF zebrafish showed higher levels of physical activity than CONR and the microbial colonization reduced the hyperactivity of GF zebrafish, suggesting colonization of bacteria affected behavior characteristics. This study provides useful information on bacterial colonization of GF zebrafish and the interaction between the host and microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6760068/ /pubmed/31620110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02156 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tan, Limbu, Qian, Qiao, Du and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Tan, Fang Limbu, Samwel Mchele Qian, Ye Qiao, Fang Du, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Meiling The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title | The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title_full | The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title_fullStr | The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title_full_unstemmed | The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title_short | The Responses of Germ-Free Zebrafish (Danio rerio) to Varying Bacterial Concentrations, Colonization Time Points, and Exposure Duration |
title_sort | responses of germ-free zebrafish (danio rerio) to varying bacterial concentrations, colonization time points, and exposure duration |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31620110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanfang theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT limbusamwelmchele theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT qianye theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT qiaofang theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT duzhenyu theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT zhangmeiling theresponsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT tanfang responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT limbusamwelmchele responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT qianye responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT qiaofang responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT duzhenyu responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration AT zhangmeiling responsesofgermfreezebrafishdanioreriotovaryingbacterialconcentrationscolonizationtimepointsandexposureduration |