Cargando…

Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2

Objectives: In Part 1 of the review of physicochemical research performed on homeopathic preparations the authors identified relevant publications of sufficient reporting quality for further in-depth analysis. In this article, the authors analyze these publications to identify any empirical evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tournier, Alexander, Klein, Sabine D., Würtenberger, Sandra, Wolf, Ursula, Baumgartner, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2019.0064
_version_ 1783453826253062144
author Tournier, Alexander
Klein, Sabine D.
Würtenberger, Sandra
Wolf, Ursula
Baumgartner, Stephan
author_facet Tournier, Alexander
Klein, Sabine D.
Würtenberger, Sandra
Wolf, Ursula
Baumgartner, Stephan
author_sort Tournier, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Objectives: In Part 1 of the review of physicochemical research performed on homeopathic preparations the authors identified relevant publications of sufficient reporting quality for further in-depth analysis. In this article, the authors analyze these publications to identify any empirical evidence for specific physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations and to identify most promising experimental techniques for future studies. Methods: After an update of the literature search up to 2018, the authors analyzed all publications in terms of individual experiments. They extracted information regarding methodological criteria such as blinding, randomization, statistics, controls, sample preparation, and replications, as well as regarding experimental design and measurement methods applied. Scores were developed to identify experimental techniques with most reliable outcomes. Results: The publications analyzed described 203 experiments. Less than 25% used blinding and/or randomization, and about one third used adequate controls to identify specific effects of homeopathic preparations. The most promising techniques used so far are nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation, optical spectroscopy, and electrical impedance measurements. In these three areas, several sets of replicated high-quality experiments provide evidence for specific physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations. Conclusions: The authors uncovered a number of promising experimental techniques that warrant replication to assess the reported physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations compared with controls. They further discuss a range of experimental aspects that highlight the many factors that need to be taken into consideration when performing basic research into homeopathic potentization. For future experiments, the authors generally recommend using succussed (vigorously shaken) controls, or comparing different homeopathic preparations with each other to reliably identify any specific physicochemical properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6760181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67601812019-09-26 Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2 Tournier, Alexander Klein, Sabine D. Würtenberger, Sandra Wolf, Ursula Baumgartner, Stephan J Altern Complement Med Reviews Objectives: In Part 1 of the review of physicochemical research performed on homeopathic preparations the authors identified relevant publications of sufficient reporting quality for further in-depth analysis. In this article, the authors analyze these publications to identify any empirical evidence for specific physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations and to identify most promising experimental techniques for future studies. Methods: After an update of the literature search up to 2018, the authors analyzed all publications in terms of individual experiments. They extracted information regarding methodological criteria such as blinding, randomization, statistics, controls, sample preparation, and replications, as well as regarding experimental design and measurement methods applied. Scores were developed to identify experimental techniques with most reliable outcomes. Results: The publications analyzed described 203 experiments. Less than 25% used blinding and/or randomization, and about one third used adequate controls to identify specific effects of homeopathic preparations. The most promising techniques used so far are nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation, optical spectroscopy, and electrical impedance measurements. In these three areas, several sets of replicated high-quality experiments provide evidence for specific physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations. Conclusions: The authors uncovered a number of promising experimental techniques that warrant replication to assess the reported physicochemical properties of homeopathic preparations compared with controls. They further discuss a range of experimental aspects that highlight the many factors that need to be taken into consideration when performing basic research into homeopathic potentization. For future experiments, the authors generally recommend using succussed (vigorously shaken) controls, or comparing different homeopathic preparations with each other to reliably identify any specific physicochemical properties. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019-09-01 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6760181/ /pubmed/31290681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2019.0064 Text en © Alexander Tournier, et al. 2019; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Tournier, Alexander
Klein, Sabine D.
Würtenberger, Sandra
Wolf, Ursula
Baumgartner, Stephan
Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title_full Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title_fullStr Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title_short Physicochemical Investigations of Homeopathic Preparations: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis—Part 2
title_sort physicochemical investigations of homeopathic preparations: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis—part 2
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2019.0064
work_keys_str_mv AT tournieralexander physicochemicalinvestigationsofhomeopathicpreparationsasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysispart2
AT kleinsabined physicochemicalinvestigationsofhomeopathicpreparationsasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysispart2
AT wurtenbergersandra physicochemicalinvestigationsofhomeopathicpreparationsasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysispart2
AT wolfursula physicochemicalinvestigationsofhomeopathicpreparationsasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysispart2
AT baumgartnerstephan physicochemicalinvestigationsofhomeopathicpreparationsasystematicreviewandbibliometricanalysispart2