Cargando…
Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult?
The interoperability of chemical and biological crystallographic data is a key challenge to research and its application to pharmaceutical design. Research attempting to combine data from the two disciplines, small-molecule or chemical crystallography (CX) and macromolecular crystallography (MX), wi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252519010972 |
_version_ | 1783453863997603840 |
---|---|
author | Brink, Alice Helliwell, John R. |
author_facet | Brink, Alice Helliwell, John R. |
author_sort | Brink, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The interoperability of chemical and biological crystallographic data is a key challenge to research and its application to pharmaceutical design. Research attempting to combine data from the two disciplines, small-molecule or chemical crystallography (CX) and macromolecular crystallography (MX), will face unique challenges including variations in terminology, software development, file format and databases which differ significantly from CX to MX. This perspective overview spans the two disciplines and originated from the investigation of protein binding to model radiopharmaceuticals. The opportunities of interlinked research while utilizing the two databases of the CSD (Cambridge Structural Database) and the PDB (Protein Data Bank) will be highlighted. The advantages of software that can handle multiple file formats and the circuitous route to convert organometallic small-molecule structural data for use in protein refinement software will be discussed. In addition some pointers to avoid being shipwrecked will be shared, such as the care which must be taken when interpreting data precision involving small molecules versus proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6760442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67604422019-10-01 Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? Brink, Alice Helliwell, John R. IUCrJ Topical Reviews The interoperability of chemical and biological crystallographic data is a key challenge to research and its application to pharmaceutical design. Research attempting to combine data from the two disciplines, small-molecule or chemical crystallography (CX) and macromolecular crystallography (MX), will face unique challenges including variations in terminology, software development, file format and databases which differ significantly from CX to MX. This perspective overview spans the two disciplines and originated from the investigation of protein binding to model radiopharmaceuticals. The opportunities of interlinked research while utilizing the two databases of the CSD (Cambridge Structural Database) and the PDB (Protein Data Bank) will be highlighted. The advantages of software that can handle multiple file formats and the circuitous route to convert organometallic small-molecule structural data for use in protein refinement software will be discussed. In addition some pointers to avoid being shipwrecked will be shared, such as the care which must be taken when interpreting data precision involving small molecules versus proteins. International Union of Crystallography 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6760442/ /pubmed/31576212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252519010972 Text en © Brink and Helliwell 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Topical Reviews Brink, Alice Helliwell, John R. Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title | Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title_full | Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title_fullStr | Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title_short | Why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
title_sort | why is interoperability between the two fields of chemical crystallography and protein crystallography so difficult? |
topic | Topical Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252519010972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinkalice whyisinteroperabilitybetweenthetwofieldsofchemicalcrystallographyandproteincrystallographysodifficult AT helliwelljohnr whyisinteroperabilitybetweenthetwofieldsofchemicalcrystallographyandproteincrystallographysodifficult |