Cargando…

A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis

Introduction Physicians are increasingly practicing defensive medicine as a response to society’s litigious climate. This study sought to characterize cardiology malpractice claims and elucidate the allegations underlying the use of defensive medicine. Methods The WestlawNext™ database was queried t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Richa, Rynecki, Nicole, Eidelman, Eric, Maddukuri, Spandana, Ayyaswami, Varun, Patel, Manthan, Gupta, Raghav, Prabhu, Arpan V, Magnani, Jared
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572644
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5259
_version_ 1783453928265875456
author Patel, Richa
Rynecki, Nicole
Eidelman, Eric
Maddukuri, Spandana
Ayyaswami, Varun
Patel, Manthan
Gupta, Raghav
Prabhu, Arpan V
Magnani, Jared
author_facet Patel, Richa
Rynecki, Nicole
Eidelman, Eric
Maddukuri, Spandana
Ayyaswami, Varun
Patel, Manthan
Gupta, Raghav
Prabhu, Arpan V
Magnani, Jared
author_sort Patel, Richa
collection PubMed
description Introduction Physicians are increasingly practicing defensive medicine as a response to society’s litigious climate. This study sought to characterize cardiology malpractice claims and elucidate the allegations underlying the use of defensive medicine. Methods The WestlawNext™ database was queried to obtain state and federal jury verdicts and settlements related to medical malpractice and cardiology that occurred in the United States between 2010 and 2015. Cardiology cases were identified using the search terms “medical malpractice” and “cardiology” and reviewed by two individuals utilizing available case documents. Duplicate and nonpertinent cases were excluded. Binary logistic regression models were created to predict the likelihood of defendant verdict, plaintiff verdict, and settlement based on the various reasons for litigation cited. Results Inclusion criteria were met in 166 cases. The plaintiffs were predominantly male (94 cases; 56.6%), and the average patient age was 53.3±17.5 years. More than half of the cases involved a cardiologist as a defendant. The most common reasons for litigation were: failure to treat (129; 77.7%), failure to diagnose (115; 69.3%), failure to refer/order diagnostic tests (107; 64.5%), and patient death (118; 71.1%). Among cases tried for failure to diagnose, the most commonly missed diagnosis was myocardial infarction. Cases most commonly resulted in a defendant verdict (94; 56.6%). However, odds of a plaintiff verdict were significantly higher when failure to diagnose was alleged with an odds ratio (OR) of 7.60 (95% confidence interval 1.14 - 50.87, p = 0.0365). Conclusions Failure to diagnose remains a commonly alleged base for litigation. In conclusion, our analysis suggests increased training for non-cardiologists in the recognition of the acute coronary syndrome and enhanced awareness of inherent biases among all physicians may facilitate reducing missed diagnoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6760876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67608762019-09-30 A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis Patel, Richa Rynecki, Nicole Eidelman, Eric Maddukuri, Spandana Ayyaswami, Varun Patel, Manthan Gupta, Raghav Prabhu, Arpan V Magnani, Jared Cureus Cardiology Introduction Physicians are increasingly practicing defensive medicine as a response to society’s litigious climate. This study sought to characterize cardiology malpractice claims and elucidate the allegations underlying the use of defensive medicine. Methods The WestlawNext™ database was queried to obtain state and federal jury verdicts and settlements related to medical malpractice and cardiology that occurred in the United States between 2010 and 2015. Cardiology cases were identified using the search terms “medical malpractice” and “cardiology” and reviewed by two individuals utilizing available case documents. Duplicate and nonpertinent cases were excluded. Binary logistic regression models were created to predict the likelihood of defendant verdict, plaintiff verdict, and settlement based on the various reasons for litigation cited. Results Inclusion criteria were met in 166 cases. The plaintiffs were predominantly male (94 cases; 56.6%), and the average patient age was 53.3±17.5 years. More than half of the cases involved a cardiologist as a defendant. The most common reasons for litigation were: failure to treat (129; 77.7%), failure to diagnose (115; 69.3%), failure to refer/order diagnostic tests (107; 64.5%), and patient death (118; 71.1%). Among cases tried for failure to diagnose, the most commonly missed diagnosis was myocardial infarction. Cases most commonly resulted in a defendant verdict (94; 56.6%). However, odds of a plaintiff verdict were significantly higher when failure to diagnose was alleged with an odds ratio (OR) of 7.60 (95% confidence interval 1.14 - 50.87, p = 0.0365). Conclusions Failure to diagnose remains a commonly alleged base for litigation. In conclusion, our analysis suggests increased training for non-cardiologists in the recognition of the acute coronary syndrome and enhanced awareness of inherent biases among all physicians may facilitate reducing missed diagnoses. Cureus 2019-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6760876/ /pubmed/31572644 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5259 Text en Copyright © 2019, Patel et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Patel, Richa
Rynecki, Nicole
Eidelman, Eric
Maddukuri, Spandana
Ayyaswami, Varun
Patel, Manthan
Gupta, Raghav
Prabhu, Arpan V
Magnani, Jared
A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title_full A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title_fullStr A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title_short A Qualitative Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Cardiology Using Case Summaries Through a National Legal Database Analysis
title_sort qualitative analysis of malpractice litigation in cardiology using case summaries through a national legal database analysis
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6760876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31572644
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5259
work_keys_str_mv AT patelricha aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT ryneckinicole aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT eidelmaneric aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT maddukurispandana aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT ayyaswamivarun aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT patelmanthan aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT guptaraghav aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT prabhuarpanv aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT magnanijared aqualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT patelricha qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT ryneckinicole qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT eidelmaneric qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT maddukurispandana qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT ayyaswamivarun qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT patelmanthan qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT guptaraghav qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT prabhuarpanv qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis
AT magnanijared qualitativeanalysisofmalpracticelitigationincardiologyusingcasesummariesthroughanationallegaldatabaseanalysis