Cargando…

Medical device surveillance with electronic health records

Post-market medical device surveillance is a challenge facing manufacturers, regulatory agencies, and health care providers. Electronic health records are valuable sources of real-world evidence for assessing device safety and tracking device-related patient outcomes over time. However, distilling t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callahan, Alison, Fries, Jason A., Ré, Christopher, Huddleston, James I., Giori, Nicholas J., Delp, Scott, Shah, Nigam H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31583282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0168-z
_version_ 1783453955936747520
author Callahan, Alison
Fries, Jason A.
Ré, Christopher
Huddleston, James I.
Giori, Nicholas J.
Delp, Scott
Shah, Nigam H.
author_facet Callahan, Alison
Fries, Jason A.
Ré, Christopher
Huddleston, James I.
Giori, Nicholas J.
Delp, Scott
Shah, Nigam H.
author_sort Callahan, Alison
collection PubMed
description Post-market medical device surveillance is a challenge facing manufacturers, regulatory agencies, and health care providers. Electronic health records are valuable sources of real-world evidence for assessing device safety and tracking device-related patient outcomes over time. However, distilling this evidence remains challenging, as information is fractured across clinical notes and structured records. Modern machine learning methods for machine reading promise to unlock increasingly complex information from text, but face barriers due to their reliance on large and expensive hand-labeled training sets. To address these challenges, we developed and validated state-of-the-art deep learning methods that identify patient outcomes from clinical notes without requiring hand-labeled training data. Using hip replacements—one of the most common implantable devices—as a test case, our methods accurately extracted implant details and reports of complications and pain from electronic health records with up to 96.3% precision, 98.5% recall, and 97.4% F1, improved classification performance by 12.8–53.9% over rule-based methods, and detected over six times as many complication events compared to using structured data alone. Using these additional events to assess complication-free survivorship of different implant systems, we found significant variation between implants, including for risk of revision surgery, which could not be detected using coded data alone. Patients with revision surgeries had more hip pain mentions in the post-hip replacement, pre-revision period compared to patients with no evidence of revision surgery (mean hip pain mentions 4.97 vs. 3.23; t = 5.14; p < 0.001). Some implant models were associated with higher or lower rates of hip pain mentions. Our methods complement existing surveillance mechanisms by requiring orders of magnitude less hand-labeled training data, offering a scalable solution for national medical device surveillance using electronic health records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6761113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67611132019-10-03 Medical device surveillance with electronic health records Callahan, Alison Fries, Jason A. Ré, Christopher Huddleston, James I. Giori, Nicholas J. Delp, Scott Shah, Nigam H. NPJ Digit Med Article Post-market medical device surveillance is a challenge facing manufacturers, regulatory agencies, and health care providers. Electronic health records are valuable sources of real-world evidence for assessing device safety and tracking device-related patient outcomes over time. However, distilling this evidence remains challenging, as information is fractured across clinical notes and structured records. Modern machine learning methods for machine reading promise to unlock increasingly complex information from text, but face barriers due to their reliance on large and expensive hand-labeled training sets. To address these challenges, we developed and validated state-of-the-art deep learning methods that identify patient outcomes from clinical notes without requiring hand-labeled training data. Using hip replacements—one of the most common implantable devices—as a test case, our methods accurately extracted implant details and reports of complications and pain from electronic health records with up to 96.3% precision, 98.5% recall, and 97.4% F1, improved classification performance by 12.8–53.9% over rule-based methods, and detected over six times as many complication events compared to using structured data alone. Using these additional events to assess complication-free survivorship of different implant systems, we found significant variation between implants, including for risk of revision surgery, which could not be detected using coded data alone. Patients with revision surgeries had more hip pain mentions in the post-hip replacement, pre-revision period compared to patients with no evidence of revision surgery (mean hip pain mentions 4.97 vs. 3.23; t = 5.14; p < 0.001). Some implant models were associated with higher or lower rates of hip pain mentions. Our methods complement existing surveillance mechanisms by requiring orders of magnitude less hand-labeled training data, offering a scalable solution for national medical device surveillance using electronic health records. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6761113/ /pubmed/31583282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0168-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Callahan, Alison
Fries, Jason A.
Ré, Christopher
Huddleston, James I.
Giori, Nicholas J.
Delp, Scott
Shah, Nigam H.
Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title_full Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title_fullStr Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title_full_unstemmed Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title_short Medical device surveillance with electronic health records
title_sort medical device surveillance with electronic health records
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31583282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0168-z
work_keys_str_mv AT callahanalison medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT friesjasona medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT rechristopher medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT huddlestonjamesi medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT giorinicholasj medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT delpscott medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords
AT shahnigamh medicaldevicesurveillancewithelectronichealthrecords