Cargando…

Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform

Many studies correlate changes in human gut microbiome with the onset of various diseases, mostly by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Setting up the optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures is crucial for robustness and reproducibility of the results. We performed a systematic comparison of several sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Videnska, Petra, Smerkova, Kristyna, Zwinsova, Barbora, Popovici, Vlad, Micenkova, Lenka, Sedlar, Karel, Budinska, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31554833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3
_version_ 1783453998415609856
author Videnska, Petra
Smerkova, Kristyna
Zwinsova, Barbora
Popovici, Vlad
Micenkova, Lenka
Sedlar, Karel
Budinska, Eva
author_facet Videnska, Petra
Smerkova, Kristyna
Zwinsova, Barbora
Popovici, Vlad
Micenkova, Lenka
Sedlar, Karel
Budinska, Eva
author_sort Videnska, Petra
collection PubMed
description Many studies correlate changes in human gut microbiome with the onset of various diseases, mostly by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Setting up the optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures is crucial for robustness and reproducibility of the results. We performed a systematic comparison of several sampling and DNA isolation kits, quantified their effect on bacterial gDNA quality and the bacterial composition estimates at all taxonomic levels. Sixteen volunteers tested three sampling kits. All samples were consequently processed by two DNA isolation kits. We found that the choice of both stool sampling and DNA isolation kits have an effect on bacterial composition with respect to Gram-positivity, however the isolation kit had a stronger effect than the sampling kit. The proportion of bacteria affected by isolation and sampling kits was larger at higher taxa levels compared to lower taxa levels. The PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit outperformed the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit mainly due to better lysis of Gram-positive bacteria while keeping the values of all the other assessed parameters within a reasonable range. The presented effects need to be taken into account when comparing results across multiple studies or computing ratios between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6761292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67612922019-10-02 Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform Videnska, Petra Smerkova, Kristyna Zwinsova, Barbora Popovici, Vlad Micenkova, Lenka Sedlar, Karel Budinska, Eva Sci Rep Article Many studies correlate changes in human gut microbiome with the onset of various diseases, mostly by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Setting up the optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures is crucial for robustness and reproducibility of the results. We performed a systematic comparison of several sampling and DNA isolation kits, quantified their effect on bacterial gDNA quality and the bacterial composition estimates at all taxonomic levels. Sixteen volunteers tested three sampling kits. All samples were consequently processed by two DNA isolation kits. We found that the choice of both stool sampling and DNA isolation kits have an effect on bacterial composition with respect to Gram-positivity, however the isolation kit had a stronger effect than the sampling kit. The proportion of bacteria affected by isolation and sampling kits was larger at higher taxa levels compared to lower taxa levels. The PowerLyzer PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit outperformed the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit mainly due to better lysis of Gram-positive bacteria while keeping the values of all the other assessed parameters within a reasonable range. The presented effects need to be taken into account when comparing results across multiple studies or computing ratios between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6761292/ /pubmed/31554833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Videnska, Petra
Smerkova, Kristyna
Zwinsova, Barbora
Popovici, Vlad
Micenkova, Lenka
Sedlar, Karel
Budinska, Eva
Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title_full Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title_fullStr Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title_full_unstemmed Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title_short Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform
title_sort stool sampling and dna isolation kits affect dna quality and bacterial composition following 16s rrna gene sequencing using miseq illumina platform
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31554833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49520-3
work_keys_str_mv AT videnskapetra stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT smerkovakristyna stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT zwinsovabarbora stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT popovicivlad stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT micenkovalenka stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT sedlarkarel stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform
AT budinskaeva stoolsamplinganddnaisolationkitsaffectdnaqualityandbacterialcompositionfollowing16srrnagenesequencingusingmiseqilluminaplatform