Cargando…

Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

BACKGROUND: Fat deposition (FD) is part of the healing process after myocardial infarction. The characteristics of FD and its impact on the outcome in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied consecutive patients unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheniti, Ghassen, Sridi, Soumaya, Sacher, Frederic, Chaumeil, Arnaud, Pillois, Xavier, Takigawa, Masateru, Frontera, Antonio, Vlachos, Konstantinos, Martin, Claire A., Teijeira, Elvis, Kitamura, Takeshi, Lam, Anna, Bourier, Felix, Puyo, Stephane, Duchateau, Josselin, Denis, Arnaud, Pambrun, Thomas, Chauvel, Remi, Derval, Nicolas, Laurent, François, Montaudon, Michel, Hocini, Meleze, Haissaguerre, Michel, Jais, Pierre, Cochet, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31378121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012482
_version_ 1783454063673737216
author Cheniti, Ghassen
Sridi, Soumaya
Sacher, Frederic
Chaumeil, Arnaud
Pillois, Xavier
Takigawa, Masateru
Frontera, Antonio
Vlachos, Konstantinos
Martin, Claire A.
Teijeira, Elvis
Kitamura, Takeshi
Lam, Anna
Bourier, Felix
Puyo, Stephane
Duchateau, Josselin
Denis, Arnaud
Pambrun, Thomas
Chauvel, Remi
Derval, Nicolas
Laurent, François
Montaudon, Michel
Hocini, Meleze
Haissaguerre, Michel
Jais, Pierre
Cochet, Hubert
author_facet Cheniti, Ghassen
Sridi, Soumaya
Sacher, Frederic
Chaumeil, Arnaud
Pillois, Xavier
Takigawa, Masateru
Frontera, Antonio
Vlachos, Konstantinos
Martin, Claire A.
Teijeira, Elvis
Kitamura, Takeshi
Lam, Anna
Bourier, Felix
Puyo, Stephane
Duchateau, Josselin
Denis, Arnaud
Pambrun, Thomas
Chauvel, Remi
Derval, Nicolas
Laurent, François
Montaudon, Michel
Hocini, Meleze
Haissaguerre, Michel
Jais, Pierre
Cochet, Hubert
author_sort Cheniti, Ghassen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fat deposition (FD) is part of the healing process after myocardial infarction. The characteristics of FD and its impact on the outcome in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied consecutive patients undergoing post–myocardial infarction VT ablation with pre‐procedural cardiac computed tomography. FD was defined as intra‐myocardial attenuation ≤ −30 HU on computed tomography. Clinical, anatomical, and post‐procedural outcome was assessed in the overall population. Electrophysiological characteristics were assessed is a subgroup of patients with high‐density electro‐anatomical maps. Sixty‐nine patients were included (66±12 years). FD was detected in 44 (64%) patients. The presence of FD related to scar age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14 per year; P=0.001) and scar extent (OR: 1.27 per segment; P=0.02). On electro‐anatomical maps, FD was characterized by lower bipolar amplitude (P<0.001) and prolonged electrogram duration (P<0.001). Although the proportion of local abnormal ventricular activation was similar (P=0.22), local abnormal ventricular activation showed lower amplitude (P<0.001) and were more delayed (P<0.001) in scars with FD. After a mean follow‐up of 26 months, patients with FD experienced a worse outcome including all‐cause mortality and VT recurrence (70% versus 28%, P log rank=0.009). On multivariate analysis, FD (hazard ratio=2.69; 95% CI, 1.12–6.46; P=0.027) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (hazard ratio=2.57; 95% CI, 1.13–5.85; P=0.024) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: FD in patients with post–myocardial infarction VT undergoing catheter ablation relates to scar age and size and may be a marker of adverse outcomes including all‐cause mortality and VT recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6761638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67616382019-09-30 Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Cheniti, Ghassen Sridi, Soumaya Sacher, Frederic Chaumeil, Arnaud Pillois, Xavier Takigawa, Masateru Frontera, Antonio Vlachos, Konstantinos Martin, Claire A. Teijeira, Elvis Kitamura, Takeshi Lam, Anna Bourier, Felix Puyo, Stephane Duchateau, Josselin Denis, Arnaud Pambrun, Thomas Chauvel, Remi Derval, Nicolas Laurent, François Montaudon, Michel Hocini, Meleze Haissaguerre, Michel Jais, Pierre Cochet, Hubert J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Fat deposition (FD) is part of the healing process after myocardial infarction. The characteristics of FD and its impact on the outcome in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied consecutive patients undergoing post–myocardial infarction VT ablation with pre‐procedural cardiac computed tomography. FD was defined as intra‐myocardial attenuation ≤ −30 HU on computed tomography. Clinical, anatomical, and post‐procedural outcome was assessed in the overall population. Electrophysiological characteristics were assessed is a subgroup of patients with high‐density electro‐anatomical maps. Sixty‐nine patients were included (66±12 years). FD was detected in 44 (64%) patients. The presence of FD related to scar age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14 per year; P=0.001) and scar extent (OR: 1.27 per segment; P=0.02). On electro‐anatomical maps, FD was characterized by lower bipolar amplitude (P<0.001) and prolonged electrogram duration (P<0.001). Although the proportion of local abnormal ventricular activation was similar (P=0.22), local abnormal ventricular activation showed lower amplitude (P<0.001) and were more delayed (P<0.001) in scars with FD. After a mean follow‐up of 26 months, patients with FD experienced a worse outcome including all‐cause mortality and VT recurrence (70% versus 28%, P log rank=0.009). On multivariate analysis, FD (hazard ratio=2.69; 95% CI, 1.12–6.46; P=0.027) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (hazard ratio=2.57; 95% CI, 1.13–5.85; P=0.024) were independent predictors of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: FD in patients with post–myocardial infarction VT undergoing catheter ablation relates to scar age and size and may be a marker of adverse outcomes including all‐cause mortality and VT recurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6761638/ /pubmed/31378121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012482 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheniti, Ghassen
Sridi, Soumaya
Sacher, Frederic
Chaumeil, Arnaud
Pillois, Xavier
Takigawa, Masateru
Frontera, Antonio
Vlachos, Konstantinos
Martin, Claire A.
Teijeira, Elvis
Kitamura, Takeshi
Lam, Anna
Bourier, Felix
Puyo, Stephane
Duchateau, Josselin
Denis, Arnaud
Pambrun, Thomas
Chauvel, Remi
Derval, Nicolas
Laurent, François
Montaudon, Michel
Hocini, Meleze
Haissaguerre, Michel
Jais, Pierre
Cochet, Hubert
Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title_full Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title_fullStr Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title_full_unstemmed Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title_short Post–Myocardial Infarction Scar With Fat Deposition Shows Specific Electrophysiological Properties and Worse Outcome After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
title_sort post–myocardial infarction scar with fat deposition shows specific electrophysiological properties and worse outcome after ventricular tachycardia ablation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31378121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012482
work_keys_str_mv AT chenitighassen postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT sridisoumaya postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT sacherfrederic postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT chaumeilarnaud postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT pilloisxavier postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT takigawamasateru postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT fronteraantonio postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT vlachoskonstantinos postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT martinclairea postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT teijeiraelvis postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT kitamuratakeshi postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT lamanna postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT bourierfelix postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT puyostephane postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT duchateaujosselin postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT denisarnaud postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT pambrunthomas postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT chauvelremi postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT dervalnicolas postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT laurentfrancois postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT montaudonmichel postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT hocinimeleze postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT haissaguerremichel postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT jaispierre postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation
AT cochethubert postmyocardialinfarctionscarwithfatdepositionshowsspecificelectrophysiologicalpropertiesandworseoutcomeafterventriculartachycardiaablation