Cargando…
Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves
BACKGROUND: In patients with mechanical heart valves, cerebral susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, postulated to be caused by degenerative metallic abrasion, are frequently referred to as valve abrasion. It remains unclear whether valve implantation not requi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012814 |
_version_ | 1783454067986530304 |
---|---|
author | Breiding, Philipe S. Duerrenmatt, Jana T. Meinel, Felix G. Carrel, Thierry Schönhoff, Florian Zibold, Felix Kaesmacher, Johannes Gralla, Jan Pilgrim, Thomas Jung, Simon Fischer, Urs Arnold, Marcel Meinel, Thomas R. |
author_facet | Breiding, Philipe S. Duerrenmatt, Jana T. Meinel, Felix G. Carrel, Thierry Schönhoff, Florian Zibold, Felix Kaesmacher, Johannes Gralla, Jan Pilgrim, Thomas Jung, Simon Fischer, Urs Arnold, Marcel Meinel, Thomas R. |
author_sort | Breiding, Philipe S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In patients with mechanical heart valves, cerebral susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, postulated to be caused by degenerative metallic abrasion, are frequently referred to as valve abrasion. It remains unclear whether valve implantation not requiring cardiopulmonary bypass or biological heart valves also shows those lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two blinded readers rated SWI lesions and cerebral amyloid angiopathy probability according to established criteria on brain magnetic resonance imaging pre‐ and postinterventionally. We assessed the association between valve type/cardiopulmonary bypass use and SWI lesion count on the first postinterventional scan using multivariable logistic regression. On postinterventional magnetic resonance imaging, 57/58 (98%) patients with mechanical heart valves had at least 1 and 46/58 (79%) 3 or more SWI lesions, while 92/97 (95%) patients with biological heart valves had at least 1 and 72/97 (74%) 3 or more SWI lesions. On multivariate analysis, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass during implantation significantly increased the odds of having SWI lesions on the first postinterventional magnetic resonance imaging (β per 10 minutes 0.498; 95% CI, 0.116–0.880; P=0.011), whereas valve type showed no significant association (P=0.338). Thirty‐seven of 155 (23.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria of possible/probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy. CONCLUSIONS: SWI lesions in patients with artificial heart valves evolve around the time point of valve implantation and the majority of patients had multiple lesions. The missing association with the valve type weakens the hypothesis of degenerative metallic abrasion and highlights cardiopulmonary bypass as the main risk factor for SWI occurrence. SWI lesions associated with cardiac procedures can mimic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Further research needs to clarify whether those lesions are associated with intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis or anticoagulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6761656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67616562019-09-30 Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves Breiding, Philipe S. Duerrenmatt, Jana T. Meinel, Felix G. Carrel, Thierry Schönhoff, Florian Zibold, Felix Kaesmacher, Johannes Gralla, Jan Pilgrim, Thomas Jung, Simon Fischer, Urs Arnold, Marcel Meinel, Thomas R. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In patients with mechanical heart valves, cerebral susceptibility‐weighted imaging (SWI) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, postulated to be caused by degenerative metallic abrasion, are frequently referred to as valve abrasion. It remains unclear whether valve implantation not requiring cardiopulmonary bypass or biological heart valves also shows those lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two blinded readers rated SWI lesions and cerebral amyloid angiopathy probability according to established criteria on brain magnetic resonance imaging pre‐ and postinterventionally. We assessed the association between valve type/cardiopulmonary bypass use and SWI lesion count on the first postinterventional scan using multivariable logistic regression. On postinterventional magnetic resonance imaging, 57/58 (98%) patients with mechanical heart valves had at least 1 and 46/58 (79%) 3 or more SWI lesions, while 92/97 (95%) patients with biological heart valves had at least 1 and 72/97 (74%) 3 or more SWI lesions. On multivariate analysis, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass during implantation significantly increased the odds of having SWI lesions on the first postinterventional magnetic resonance imaging (β per 10 minutes 0.498; 95% CI, 0.116–0.880; P=0.011), whereas valve type showed no significant association (P=0.338). Thirty‐seven of 155 (23.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria of possible/probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy. CONCLUSIONS: SWI lesions in patients with artificial heart valves evolve around the time point of valve implantation and the majority of patients had multiple lesions. The missing association with the valve type weakens the hypothesis of degenerative metallic abrasion and highlights cardiopulmonary bypass as the main risk factor for SWI occurrence. SWI lesions associated with cardiac procedures can mimic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Further research needs to clarify whether those lesions are associated with intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis or anticoagulation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6761656/ /pubmed/31379252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012814 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Breiding, Philipe S. Duerrenmatt, Jana T. Meinel, Felix G. Carrel, Thierry Schönhoff, Florian Zibold, Felix Kaesmacher, Johannes Gralla, Jan Pilgrim, Thomas Jung, Simon Fischer, Urs Arnold, Marcel Meinel, Thomas R. Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title | Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title_full | Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title_short | Prevalence and Evolution of Susceptibility‐Weighted Imaging Lesions in Patients With Artificial Heart Valves |
title_sort | prevalence and evolution of susceptibility‐weighted imaging lesions in patients with artificial heart valves |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31379252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breidingphilipes prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT duerrenmattjanat prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT meinelfelixg prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT carrelthierry prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT schonhoffflorian prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT ziboldfelix prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT kaesmacherjohannes prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT grallajan prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT pilgrimthomas prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT jungsimon prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT fischerurs prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT arnoldmarcel prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves AT meinelthomasr prevalenceandevolutionofsusceptibilityweightedimaginglesionsinpatientswithartificialheartvalves |