Cargando…

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help both in assessment and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. We designed a prospective trial comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leone, Antonio Maria, Burzotta, Francesco, Aurigemma, Cristina, De Maria, Giovanni Luigi, Zambrano, Aniello, Zimbardo, Giuseppe, Arioti, Manfredi, Cerracchio, Emma, Vergallo, Rocco, Trani, Carlo, Crea, Filippo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012772
_version_ 1783454069444050944
author Leone, Antonio Maria
Burzotta, Francesco
Aurigemma, Cristina
De Maria, Giovanni Luigi
Zambrano, Aniello
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Arioti, Manfredi
Cerracchio, Emma
Vergallo, Rocco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
author_facet Leone, Antonio Maria
Burzotta, Francesco
Aurigemma, Cristina
De Maria, Giovanni Luigi
Zambrano, Aniello
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Arioti, Manfredi
Cerracchio, Emma
Vergallo, Rocco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
author_sort Leone, Antonio Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help both in assessment and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. We designed a prospective trial comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associated with FFR or OCT in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred fifty patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (n=446) were randomized to FFR or OCT guidance. In the FFR arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if FFR was ≤0.80 aiming for a postprocedure FFR >0.90. In the OCT arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if percentage of area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal lumen area <2.5 mm(2) or plaque ulceration. Costs, angina frequency, and major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 1 month and at 13 months. We present early data at 1 month consistent with a prespecified analysis of secondary end points. Patients randomized to FFR, as compared with OCT, were significantly more commonly managed with medical therapy alone (67.7% versus 41.1%; P<0.001), required less contrast media (245±137 versus 280±129 mL; P=0.004), and exhibited a lower occurrence of contrast‐induced acute kidney injury (1.7% versus 8.6%; P=0.034). At 1 month, in comparison to FFR, OCT was associated with increased total costs (2831±1288 versus 4292±3844 euros/patient; P<0.001) whereas occurrence of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina was similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, a functional guidance by FFR, as compared with OCT, increased the rate of patients treated with medical therapy alone. This translated into a significant reduction in administered contrast, contrast‐induced acute kidney injury, and total costs at 1 month with FFR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrialsgov. Unique identifier: NCT01824030.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6761662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67616622019-09-30 Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results Leone, Antonio Maria Burzotta, Francesco Aurigemma, Cristina De Maria, Giovanni Luigi Zambrano, Aniello Zimbardo, Giuseppe Arioti, Manfredi Cerracchio, Emma Vergallo, Rocco Trani, Carlo Crea, Filippo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help both in assessment and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. We designed a prospective trial comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associated with FFR or OCT in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred fifty patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (n=446) were randomized to FFR or OCT guidance. In the FFR arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if FFR was ≤0.80 aiming for a postprocedure FFR >0.90. In the OCT arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if percentage of area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal lumen area <2.5 mm(2) or plaque ulceration. Costs, angina frequency, and major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 1 month and at 13 months. We present early data at 1 month consistent with a prespecified analysis of secondary end points. Patients randomized to FFR, as compared with OCT, were significantly more commonly managed with medical therapy alone (67.7% versus 41.1%; P<0.001), required less contrast media (245±137 versus 280±129 mL; P=0.004), and exhibited a lower occurrence of contrast‐induced acute kidney injury (1.7% versus 8.6%; P=0.034). At 1 month, in comparison to FFR, OCT was associated with increased total costs (2831±1288 versus 4292±3844 euros/patient; P<0.001) whereas occurrence of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina was similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, a functional guidance by FFR, as compared with OCT, increased the rate of patients treated with medical therapy alone. This translated into a significant reduction in administered contrast, contrast‐induced acute kidney injury, and total costs at 1 month with FFR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrialsgov. Unique identifier: NCT01824030. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6761662/ /pubmed/31331219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012772 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Leone, Antonio Maria
Burzotta, Francesco
Aurigemma, Cristina
De Maria, Giovanni Luigi
Zambrano, Aniello
Zimbardo, Giuseppe
Arioti, Manfredi
Cerracchio, Emma
Vergallo, Rocco
Trani, Carlo
Crea, Filippo
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title_full Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title_fullStr Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title_short Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One‐Month Results
title_sort prospective randomized comparison of fractional flow reserve versus optical coherence tomography to guide revascularization of intermediate coronary stenoses: one‐month results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6761662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012772
work_keys_str_mv AT leoneantoniomaria prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT burzottafrancesco prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT aurigemmacristina prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT demariagiovanniluigi prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT zambranoaniello prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT zimbardogiuseppe prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT ariotimanfredi prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT cerracchioemma prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT vergallorocco prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT tranicarlo prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults
AT creafilippo prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoffractionalflowreserveversusopticalcoherencetomographytoguiderevascularizationofintermediatecoronarystenosesonemonthresults