Cargando…

Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures

INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures make up 63% of all pelvic ring injuries. This fracture pattern is typically seen in older patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the ambulatory status of individuals sustaining LC1 fractures at long-term follow-up and wha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kugelman, David N., Fisher, Nina, Konda, Sanjit R., Egol, Kenneth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319878101
_version_ 1783454298563149824
author Kugelman, David N.
Fisher, Nina
Konda, Sanjit R.
Egol, Kenneth A.
author_facet Kugelman, David N.
Fisher, Nina
Konda, Sanjit R.
Egol, Kenneth A.
author_sort Kugelman, David N.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures make up 63% of all pelvic ring injuries. This fracture pattern is typically seen in older patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the ambulatory status of individuals sustaining LC1 fractures at long-term follow-up and what specific characteristics, if any, effect this status or functional outcomes. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, all pelvic ring injury at 2 hospitals within one academic institution was queried. One hundred sixty-one low-energy LC1 pelvic fractures were identified. RESULTS: Fifty patients were available for long-term outcomes (mean: 36 months). Long-term functional outcomes (mean follow-up: 36 months) as measured by SMFA subgroup scores were demonstrated to be 3 times higher in patients currently using assistive devices for walking (P = .012). Increased age (P = .050) was associated with the continued use of assistive walking devices. Of the patients who did not use an ambulatory device prior to LC1 injury, 5 (11.6%) sustained a fall or medical complication within 30 days of the index pelvic fracture; this was associated with the current use of an assistive ambulatory device (P = .010). Forty-three (86%) patients didn’t use an assistive ambulatory device prior to sustaining the LC1 fracture. Seven (14%) patients utilized assistive devices both before and after the LC1 injury. Thirteen (26%) patients, who did not utilize assistive ambulatory devices prior to their injury, necessitated them at long-term follow-up. DISCUSSION: Surgeons should be aware of these associations, as they can implement early interventions aimed at patients at risk, for assistive device use, following LC1 pelvic fractures. CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of the patients sustaining an LC1 pelvic fracture continue to use an aid for ambulation at long-term follow-up. Older age, complications, and falls within 30 days of this injury are associated with the utilization of an assistive ambulatory device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67640682019-10-09 Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures Kugelman, David N. Fisher, Nina Konda, Sanjit R. Egol, Kenneth A. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures make up 63% of all pelvic ring injuries. This fracture pattern is typically seen in older patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the ambulatory status of individuals sustaining LC1 fractures at long-term follow-up and what specific characteristics, if any, effect this status or functional outcomes. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, all pelvic ring injury at 2 hospitals within one academic institution was queried. One hundred sixty-one low-energy LC1 pelvic fractures were identified. RESULTS: Fifty patients were available for long-term outcomes (mean: 36 months). Long-term functional outcomes (mean follow-up: 36 months) as measured by SMFA subgroup scores were demonstrated to be 3 times higher in patients currently using assistive devices for walking (P = .012). Increased age (P = .050) was associated with the continued use of assistive walking devices. Of the patients who did not use an ambulatory device prior to LC1 injury, 5 (11.6%) sustained a fall or medical complication within 30 days of the index pelvic fracture; this was associated with the current use of an assistive ambulatory device (P = .010). Forty-three (86%) patients didn’t use an assistive ambulatory device prior to sustaining the LC1 fracture. Seven (14%) patients utilized assistive devices both before and after the LC1 injury. Thirteen (26%) patients, who did not utilize assistive ambulatory devices prior to their injury, necessitated them at long-term follow-up. DISCUSSION: Surgeons should be aware of these associations, as they can implement early interventions aimed at patients at risk, for assistive device use, following LC1 pelvic fractures. CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of the patients sustaining an LC1 pelvic fracture continue to use an aid for ambulation at long-term follow-up. Older age, complications, and falls within 30 days of this injury are associated with the utilization of an assistive ambulatory device. SAGE Publications 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6764068/ /pubmed/31598390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319878101 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kugelman, David N.
Fisher, Nina
Konda, Sanjit R.
Egol, Kenneth A.
Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title_full Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title_fullStr Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title_short Loss of Ambulatory Independence Following Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures
title_sort loss of ambulatory independence following low-energy pelvic ring fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459319878101
work_keys_str_mv AT kugelmandavidn lossofambulatoryindependencefollowinglowenergypelvicringfractures
AT fishernina lossofambulatoryindependencefollowinglowenergypelvicringfractures
AT kondasanjitr lossofambulatoryindependencefollowinglowenergypelvicringfractures
AT egolkennetha lossofambulatoryindependencefollowinglowenergypelvicringfractures