Cargando…

SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs

BACKGROUND: Mate allocation strategies that account for non-additive genetic effects can be used to maximize the overall genetic merit of future offspring. Accounting for dominance effects in genetic evaluations is easier in a genomic context, than in a classical pedigree-based context because the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Diéguez, David, Tusell, Llibertat, Carillier-Jacquin, Céline, Bouquet, Alban, Vitezica, Zulma G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0498-y
_version_ 1783454314486824960
author González-Diéguez, David
Tusell, Llibertat
Carillier-Jacquin, Céline
Bouquet, Alban
Vitezica, Zulma G.
author_facet González-Diéguez, David
Tusell, Llibertat
Carillier-Jacquin, Céline
Bouquet, Alban
Vitezica, Zulma G.
author_sort González-Diéguez, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mate allocation strategies that account for non-additive genetic effects can be used to maximize the overall genetic merit of future offspring. Accounting for dominance effects in genetic evaluations is easier in a genomic context, than in a classical pedigree-based context because the combinations of alleles at loci are known. The objective of our study was two-fold. First, dominance variance components were estimated for age at 100 kg (AGE), backfat depth (BD) at 140 days, and for average piglet weight at birth within litter (APWL). Second, the efficiency of mate allocation strategies that account for dominance and inbreeding depression to maximize the overall genetic merit of future offspring was explored. RESULTS: Genetic variance components were estimated using genomic models that included inbreeding depression with and without non-additive genetic effects (dominance). Models that included dominance effects did not fit the data better than the genomic additive model. Estimates of dominance variances, expressed as a percentage of additive genetic variance, were 20, 11, and 12% for AGE, BD, and APWL, respectively. Estimates of additive and dominance single nucleotide polymorphism effects were retrieved from the genetic variance component estimates and used to predict the outcome of matings in terms of total genetic and breeding values. Maximizing total genetic values instead of breeding values in matings gave the progeny an average advantage of − 0.79 days, − 0.04 mm, and 11.3 g for AGE, BD and APWL, respectively, but slightly reduced the expected additive genetic gain, e.g. by 1.8% for AGE. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic mate allocation accounting for non-additive genetic effects is a feasible and potential strategy to improve the performance of the offspring without dramatically compromising additive genetic gain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67641352019-09-30 SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs González-Diéguez, David Tusell, Llibertat Carillier-Jacquin, Céline Bouquet, Alban Vitezica, Zulma G. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mate allocation strategies that account for non-additive genetic effects can be used to maximize the overall genetic merit of future offspring. Accounting for dominance effects in genetic evaluations is easier in a genomic context, than in a classical pedigree-based context because the combinations of alleles at loci are known. The objective of our study was two-fold. First, dominance variance components were estimated for age at 100 kg (AGE), backfat depth (BD) at 140 days, and for average piglet weight at birth within litter (APWL). Second, the efficiency of mate allocation strategies that account for dominance and inbreeding depression to maximize the overall genetic merit of future offspring was explored. RESULTS: Genetic variance components were estimated using genomic models that included inbreeding depression with and without non-additive genetic effects (dominance). Models that included dominance effects did not fit the data better than the genomic additive model. Estimates of dominance variances, expressed as a percentage of additive genetic variance, were 20, 11, and 12% for AGE, BD, and APWL, respectively. Estimates of additive and dominance single nucleotide polymorphism effects were retrieved from the genetic variance component estimates and used to predict the outcome of matings in terms of total genetic and breeding values. Maximizing total genetic values instead of breeding values in matings gave the progeny an average advantage of − 0.79 days, − 0.04 mm, and 11.3 g for AGE, BD and APWL, respectively, but slightly reduced the expected additive genetic gain, e.g. by 1.8% for AGE. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic mate allocation accounting for non-additive genetic effects is a feasible and potential strategy to improve the performance of the offspring without dramatically compromising additive genetic gain. BioMed Central 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6764135/ /pubmed/31558151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0498-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
González-Diéguez, David
Tusell, Llibertat
Carillier-Jacquin, Céline
Bouquet, Alban
Vitezica, Zulma G.
SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title_full SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title_fullStr SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title_full_unstemmed SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title_short SNP-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
title_sort snp-based mate allocation strategies to maximize total genetic value in pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0498-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezdieguezdavid snpbasedmateallocationstrategiestomaximizetotalgeneticvalueinpigs
AT tusellllibertat snpbasedmateallocationstrategiestomaximizetotalgeneticvalueinpigs
AT carillierjacquinceline snpbasedmateallocationstrategiestomaximizetotalgeneticvalueinpigs
AT bouquetalban snpbasedmateallocationstrategiestomaximizetotalgeneticvalueinpigs
AT vitezicazulmag snpbasedmateallocationstrategiestomaximizetotalgeneticvalueinpigs