Cargando…
Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814 |
_version_ | 1783454339920035840 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, Lynn Elleri, Daniela Bond, Simon Howlett, James Dunger, David B Beardsall, Kathryn |
author_facet | Thomson, Lynn Elleri, Daniela Bond, Simon Howlett, James Dunger, David B Beardsall, Kathryn |
author_sort | Thomson, Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility and safety of CGM to target glucose control in preterm infants, to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: We performed a single centre study in very preterm infants during the first week of life. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of CGM with blood glucose levels (n=20 infants). In a separate pilot study of efficacy (n=20), real-time CGM combined with a paper guideline to target glucose control (2.6–10 mmol/L) was compared with standard neonatal care (masked CGM). Questionnaires were used to assess staff acceptability. RESULTS: No concerns were raised about infection or skin integrity at sensor site. The sensor performed well compared with point-of-care blood glucose measurements, mean bias of −0.27 (95% CI −0.35 to −0.19). Per cent time in target range (sensor glucose 2.6–10 mmol/L) was greater with CGM than POC (77% vs 59%, respectively) and per cent time sensor glucose >10 mmol/L was less with CGM than POC (24% vs 40%, respectively). The CGM also detected clinically unsuspected episodes of hypoglycaemia. Staff reported that the use of the CGM positively improved clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CGM has sufficient accuracy and utility in preterm infants to warrant formal testing in a RCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6764251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67642512019-10-07 Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring Thomson, Lynn Elleri, Daniela Bond, Simon Howlett, James Dunger, David B Beardsall, Kathryn Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Original Article OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility and safety of CGM to target glucose control in preterm infants, to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: We performed a single centre study in very preterm infants during the first week of life. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of CGM with blood glucose levels (n=20 infants). In a separate pilot study of efficacy (n=20), real-time CGM combined with a paper guideline to target glucose control (2.6–10 mmol/L) was compared with standard neonatal care (masked CGM). Questionnaires were used to assess staff acceptability. RESULTS: No concerns were raised about infection or skin integrity at sensor site. The sensor performed well compared with point-of-care blood glucose measurements, mean bias of −0.27 (95% CI −0.35 to −0.19). Per cent time in target range (sensor glucose 2.6–10 mmol/L) was greater with CGM than POC (77% vs 59%, respectively) and per cent time sensor glucose >10 mmol/L was less with CGM than POC (24% vs 40%, respectively). The CGM also detected clinically unsuspected episodes of hypoglycaemia. Staff reported that the use of the CGM positively improved clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CGM has sufficient accuracy and utility in preterm infants to warrant formal testing in a RCT. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6764251/ /pubmed/30232094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thomson, Lynn Elleri, Daniela Bond, Simon Howlett, James Dunger, David B Beardsall, Kathryn Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title | Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title_full | Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title_fullStr | Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title_short | Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
title_sort | targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonlynn targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring AT elleridaniela targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring AT bondsimon targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring AT howlettjames targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring AT dungerdavidb targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring AT beardsallkathryn targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring |