Cargando…

Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring

OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Lynn, Elleri, Daniela, Bond, Simon, Howlett, James, Dunger, David B, Beardsall, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814
_version_ 1783454339920035840
author Thomson, Lynn
Elleri, Daniela
Bond, Simon
Howlett, James
Dunger, David B
Beardsall, Kathryn
author_facet Thomson, Lynn
Elleri, Daniela
Bond, Simon
Howlett, James
Dunger, David B
Beardsall, Kathryn
author_sort Thomson, Lynn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility and safety of CGM to target glucose control in preterm infants, to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: We performed a single centre study in very preterm infants during the first week of life. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of CGM with blood glucose levels (n=20 infants). In a separate pilot study of efficacy (n=20), real-time CGM combined with a paper guideline to target glucose control (2.6–10 mmol/L) was compared with standard neonatal care (masked CGM). Questionnaires were used to assess staff acceptability. RESULTS: No concerns were raised about infection or skin integrity at sensor site. The sensor performed well compared with point-of-care blood glucose measurements, mean bias of −0.27 (95% CI −0.35 to −0.19). Per cent time in target range (sensor glucose 2.6–10 mmol/L) was greater with CGM than POC (77% vs 59%, respectively) and per cent time sensor glucose >10 mmol/L was less with CGM than POC (24% vs 40%, respectively). The CGM also detected clinically unsuspected episodes of hypoglycaemia. Staff reported that the use of the CGM positively improved clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CGM has sufficient accuracy and utility in preterm infants to warrant formal testing in a RCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67642512019-10-07 Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring Thomson, Lynn Elleri, Daniela Bond, Simon Howlett, James Dunger, David B Beardsall, Kathryn Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Original Article OBJECTIVE: Hyperglycaemia is common in very preterm infants and is associated with adverse outcomes. Preventing hyperglycaemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia is difficult. Real time tracking with continuous glucose monitors (CGM) may improve glucose control. We assessed the feasibility and safety of CGM to target glucose control in preterm infants, to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: We performed a single centre study in very preterm infants during the first week of life. Accuracy was assessed by comparison of CGM with blood glucose levels (n=20 infants). In a separate pilot study of efficacy (n=20), real-time CGM combined with a paper guideline to target glucose control (2.6–10 mmol/L) was compared with standard neonatal care (masked CGM). Questionnaires were used to assess staff acceptability. RESULTS: No concerns were raised about infection or skin integrity at sensor site. The sensor performed well compared with point-of-care blood glucose measurements, mean bias of −0.27 (95% CI −0.35 to −0.19). Per cent time in target range (sensor glucose 2.6–10 mmol/L) was greater with CGM than POC (77% vs 59%, respectively) and per cent time sensor glucose >10 mmol/L was less with CGM than POC (24% vs 40%, respectively). The CGM also detected clinically unsuspected episodes of hypoglycaemia. Staff reported that the use of the CGM positively improved clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CGM has sufficient accuracy and utility in preterm infants to warrant formal testing in a RCT. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6764251/ /pubmed/30232094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thomson, Lynn
Elleri, Daniela
Bond, Simon
Howlett, James
Dunger, David B
Beardsall, Kathryn
Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title_full Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title_fullStr Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title_short Targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
title_sort targeting glucose control in preterm infants: pilot studies of continuous glucose monitoring
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30232094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314814
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonlynn targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring
AT elleridaniela targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring
AT bondsimon targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring
AT howlettjames targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring
AT dungerdavidb targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring
AT beardsallkathryn targetingglucosecontrolinpreterminfantspilotstudiesofcontinuousglucosemonitoring