Cargando…

Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy

Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parente, Alexis, Sutton, Bryce, Petrilla, Allison, Teigland, Christie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764333/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324
_version_ 1783454358308913152
author Parente, Alexis
Sutton, Bryce
Petrilla, Allison
Teigland, Christie
author_facet Parente, Alexis
Sutton, Bryce
Petrilla, Allison
Teigland, Christie
author_sort Parente, Alexis
collection PubMed
description Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical trials with small sample sizes have suggested that emerging DMTs (iteriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate/BG-12, alemtuzumab and pegylated IFN) may have distinct advantages relative to established DMTs including better outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. However, there is limited real-world information regarding which DMTs (established vs. emerging) provide the best clinical response and outcomes in managed care populations of patients with MS. Aims: To compare MS related healthcare use within one year of initiating emergent and established DMTs among Managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with MS in the US. Methods: A large national sample of patient-level administrative healthcare claims data was used for this analysis. MS patients aged 18 years and over with a new prescription fill for an established or emergent DMT between 2013 and 2016 were evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in a health plan with pharmacy and medical coverage for at least 6 months before and 1 year after initiation of therapy. Four types of healthcare use were examined: MS-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and relapse events (inpatient and outpatient). Multivariate negative binomial models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the association between MS related healthcare use and type of DMT. All models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson index and geographic region. Results: During the study period, 6981 Managed Medicaid individuals with a MS diagnosis initiated a DMT. Of those, 79.8% were female, 50.4% were aged 40–64 years and 21.5% were on emergent DMTs. Emergent DMT users had fewer hospitalizations compared to first generation DMT users within one year of initiating therapy (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88) and fewer outpatient relapses (ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79–0.95). Differences in inpatient relapses and ER visits were not observed by DMT type. Conclusions: This study suggests emergent DMTs are associated with reduced MS-related hospitalizations and outpatient relapses within one year of initiating therapy. Studies examining a longer treatment time frame and additional outcomes are warranted to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67643332019-10-08 Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy Parente, Alexis Sutton, Bryce Petrilla, Allison Teigland, Christie J Drug Assess Poster #43 Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical trials with small sample sizes have suggested that emerging DMTs (iteriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate/BG-12, alemtuzumab and pegylated IFN) may have distinct advantages relative to established DMTs including better outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. However, there is limited real-world information regarding which DMTs (established vs. emerging) provide the best clinical response and outcomes in managed care populations of patients with MS. Aims: To compare MS related healthcare use within one year of initiating emergent and established DMTs among Managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with MS in the US. Methods: A large national sample of patient-level administrative healthcare claims data was used for this analysis. MS patients aged 18 years and over with a new prescription fill for an established or emergent DMT between 2013 and 2016 were evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in a health plan with pharmacy and medical coverage for at least 6 months before and 1 year after initiation of therapy. Four types of healthcare use were examined: MS-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and relapse events (inpatient and outpatient). Multivariate negative binomial models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the association between MS related healthcare use and type of DMT. All models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson index and geographic region. Results: During the study period, 6981 Managed Medicaid individuals with a MS diagnosis initiated a DMT. Of those, 79.8% were female, 50.4% were aged 40–64 years and 21.5% were on emergent DMTs. Emergent DMT users had fewer hospitalizations compared to first generation DMT users within one year of initiating therapy (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88) and fewer outpatient relapses (ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79–0.95). Differences in inpatient relapses and ER visits were not observed by DMT type. Conclusions: This study suggests emergent DMTs are associated with reduced MS-related hospitalizations and outpatient relapses within one year of initiating therapy. Studies examining a longer treatment time frame and additional outcomes are warranted to confirm these findings. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6764333/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster #43
Parente, Alexis
Sutton, Bryce
Petrilla, Allison
Teigland, Christie
Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title_full Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title_fullStr Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title_short Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
title_sort comparison of healthcare utilization among managed medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
topic Poster #43
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764333/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658324
work_keys_str_mv AT parentealexis comparisonofhealthcareutilizationamongmanagedmedicaidindividualsdiagnosedwithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithemergentversusestablisheddiseasemodifyingtherapy
AT suttonbryce comparisonofhealthcareutilizationamongmanagedmedicaidindividualsdiagnosedwithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithemergentversusestablisheddiseasemodifyingtherapy
AT petrillaallison comparisonofhealthcareutilizationamongmanagedmedicaidindividualsdiagnosedwithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithemergentversusestablisheddiseasemodifyingtherapy
AT teiglandchristie comparisonofhealthcareutilizationamongmanagedmedicaidindividualsdiagnosedwithmultiplesclerosistreatedwithemergentversusestablisheddiseasemodifyingtherapy