Cargando…

Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts

Background: Previous research has highlighted the importance of major atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate, through its precursor sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), black carbon (BC), and organic carbon (OC), and their effect on global climate regimes, specifically on their impact on particulate matter measuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seposo, Xerxes, Ueda, Kayo, Park, Sang Seo, Sudo, Kengo, Takemura, Toshihiko, Nakajima, Teruyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31554480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1664130
_version_ 1783454370240659456
author Seposo, Xerxes
Ueda, Kayo
Park, Sang Seo
Sudo, Kengo
Takemura, Toshihiko
Nakajima, Teruyuki
author_facet Seposo, Xerxes
Ueda, Kayo
Park, Sang Seo
Sudo, Kengo
Takemura, Toshihiko
Nakajima, Teruyuki
author_sort Seposo, Xerxes
collection PubMed
description Background: Previous research has highlighted the importance of major atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate, through its precursor sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), black carbon (BC), and organic carbon (OC), and their effect on global climate regimes, specifically on their impact on particulate matter measuring ≤ 2.5 μm (PM(2.5)). Policy regulations have attempted to address the change in these major active aerosols and their impact on PM(2.5), which would presumably have a cascading effect toward the change of health risks. Objective: This study aimed to determine how the change in the global emissions of anthropogenic aerosols affects health, particularly through the change in attributable mortality (AN) and years of life lost (YLL). This study also aimed to explore the importance of using AM/YLL in conveying air pollution health impact message. Methods: The Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate was used to estimate the gridded atmospheric PM(2.5) by changing the emission of SO(2), BC, and OC. Next, the emissions were utilized to estimate the associated cause-specific risks via an integrated exposure–response function, and its consequent health indicators, AM and YLL, per country. Results: OC change yielded the greatest benefit for all country income groups, particularly among low-middle-income countries. Utilizing either AM or YLL did not alter the order of benefits among upper-middle and high-income countries (UMIC/HIC); however, using either health indicator to express the order of benefit varied among low- and low-middle-income countries (LIC/LMIC). Conclusions: Global and country-specific mitigation efforts focusing on OC-related activities would yield substantial health benefits. Substantial aerosol emission reduction would greatly benefit high-emitting countries (i.e. China and India). Although no difference is found in the order of health outcome benefits in UMIC/HIC, caution is warranted in using either AM or YLL for health impact assessment in LIC/LMIC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67643812019-10-08 Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts Seposo, Xerxes Ueda, Kayo Park, Sang Seo Sudo, Kengo Takemura, Toshihiko Nakajima, Teruyuki Glob Health Action Original Article Background: Previous research has highlighted the importance of major atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate, through its precursor sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), black carbon (BC), and organic carbon (OC), and their effect on global climate regimes, specifically on their impact on particulate matter measuring ≤ 2.5 μm (PM(2.5)). Policy regulations have attempted to address the change in these major active aerosols and their impact on PM(2.5), which would presumably have a cascading effect toward the change of health risks. Objective: This study aimed to determine how the change in the global emissions of anthropogenic aerosols affects health, particularly through the change in attributable mortality (AN) and years of life lost (YLL). This study also aimed to explore the importance of using AM/YLL in conveying air pollution health impact message. Methods: The Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate was used to estimate the gridded atmospheric PM(2.5) by changing the emission of SO(2), BC, and OC. Next, the emissions were utilized to estimate the associated cause-specific risks via an integrated exposure–response function, and its consequent health indicators, AM and YLL, per country. Results: OC change yielded the greatest benefit for all country income groups, particularly among low-middle-income countries. Utilizing either AM or YLL did not alter the order of benefits among upper-middle and high-income countries (UMIC/HIC); however, using either health indicator to express the order of benefit varied among low- and low-middle-income countries (LIC/LMIC). Conclusions: Global and country-specific mitigation efforts focusing on OC-related activities would yield substantial health benefits. Substantial aerosol emission reduction would greatly benefit high-emitting countries (i.e. China and India). Although no difference is found in the order of health outcome benefits in UMIC/HIC, caution is warranted in using either AM or YLL for health impact assessment in LIC/LMIC. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6764381/ /pubmed/31554480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1664130 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seposo, Xerxes
Ueda, Kayo
Park, Sang Seo
Sudo, Kengo
Takemura, Toshihiko
Nakajima, Teruyuki
Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title_full Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title_fullStr Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title_full_unstemmed Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title_short Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM(2.5)-related health impacts
title_sort effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on pm(2.5)-related health impacts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31554480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1664130
work_keys_str_mv AT seposoxerxes effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts
AT uedakayo effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts
AT parksangseo effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts
AT sudokengo effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts
AT takemuratoshihiko effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts
AT nakajimateruyuki effectofglobalatmosphericaerosolemissionchangeonpm25relatedhealthimpacts