Cargando…

Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model

Background: Benchmarking in healthcare is used to evaluate productivity on the basis of workflows, policies and performance in hopes of optimizing current practices and improving patient outcomes. Benchmarking has long been used in pharmacy practice, whether in tracking dispensing activities or opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Platt, Thom, Shah, Rushabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764474/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658314
_version_ 1783454383071035392
author Platt, Thom
Shah, Rushabh
author_facet Platt, Thom
Shah, Rushabh
author_sort Platt, Thom
collection PubMed
description Background: Benchmarking in healthcare is used to evaluate productivity on the basis of workflows, policies and performance in hopes of optimizing current practices and improving patient outcomes. Benchmarking has long been used in pharmacy practice, whether in tracking dispensing activities or optimizing clinical workflows. Internal benchmarking allows organizations to examine internal processes to determine allocation of institutional resources. Currently there is no validated model to evaluate productivity in specialty pharmacy workflows. Aims: To develop and validate a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking tool. Methods: A timer tool was developed to allow pharmacists to track the time spent performing activities which we identified as key performance indicators. Key performance indicators were identified as: prior authorizations, appeals of coverage denial, financial assistance activities, clinical onboarding activities, care plan activities and clinical assessments. These times were utilized to establish benchmarks for each key performance indicator. Raw activity number was tracked for each branch utilizing data from specialty management software database, Therigy. From these data, benchmark standards were derived, and all branches were evaluated. Results: Benchmarking standardized to the inflammatory diseases branch showed a near 2.5 fold elevation in workload in the hematology and oncology branch. The pulmonary branch showed a decreased workload compared to inflammatory diseases by approximately 35%. Neurology and infectious diseases within the 20% relative workload range of inflammatory diseases and are considered to have an equal productivity level. Conclusions: Results from this study provide a solid foundation for this benchmarking tool. Moving forward with this model the addition of technician metrics and a broader collection of performance indicators across a larger data collection period will be required to more fully develop the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67644742019-10-08 Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model Platt, Thom Shah, Rushabh J Drug Assess Poster #34 Background: Benchmarking in healthcare is used to evaluate productivity on the basis of workflows, policies and performance in hopes of optimizing current practices and improving patient outcomes. Benchmarking has long been used in pharmacy practice, whether in tracking dispensing activities or optimizing clinical workflows. Internal benchmarking allows organizations to examine internal processes to determine allocation of institutional resources. Currently there is no validated model to evaluate productivity in specialty pharmacy workflows. Aims: To develop and validate a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking tool. Methods: A timer tool was developed to allow pharmacists to track the time spent performing activities which we identified as key performance indicators. Key performance indicators were identified as: prior authorizations, appeals of coverage denial, financial assistance activities, clinical onboarding activities, care plan activities and clinical assessments. These times were utilized to establish benchmarks for each key performance indicator. Raw activity number was tracked for each branch utilizing data from specialty management software database, Therigy. From these data, benchmark standards were derived, and all branches were evaluated. Results: Benchmarking standardized to the inflammatory diseases branch showed a near 2.5 fold elevation in workload in the hematology and oncology branch. The pulmonary branch showed a decreased workload compared to inflammatory diseases by approximately 35%. Neurology and infectious diseases within the 20% relative workload range of inflammatory diseases and are considered to have an equal productivity level. Conclusions: Results from this study provide a solid foundation for this benchmarking tool. Moving forward with this model the addition of technician metrics and a broader collection of performance indicators across a larger data collection period will be required to more fully develop the model. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6764474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658314 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster #34
Platt, Thom
Shah, Rushabh
Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title_full Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title_fullStr Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title_full_unstemmed Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title_short Development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
title_sort development of a specialty pharmacy productivity benchmarking model
topic Poster #34
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764474/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1658314
work_keys_str_mv AT plattthom developmentofaspecialtypharmacyproductivitybenchmarkingmodel
AT shahrushabh developmentofaspecialtypharmacyproductivitybenchmarkingmodel