Cargando…
Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes
OBJECTIVE: To rigorously compare automated atlas‐based and manual tracing hippocampal segmentation for accuracy, repeatability, and clinical acceptability given a relevant range of imaging abnormalities in clinical epilepsy. METHODS: Forty‐nine patients with hippocampal asymmetry were identified fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50885 |
_version_ | 1783454387308331008 |
---|---|
author | Brinkmann, Benjamin H. Guragain, Hari Kenney‐Jung, Daniel Mandrekar, Jay Watson, Robert E. Welker, Kirk M. Britton, Jeffrey W. Witte, Robert J. |
author_facet | Brinkmann, Benjamin H. Guragain, Hari Kenney‐Jung, Daniel Mandrekar, Jay Watson, Robert E. Welker, Kirk M. Britton, Jeffrey W. Witte, Robert J. |
author_sort | Brinkmann, Benjamin H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To rigorously compare automated atlas‐based and manual tracing hippocampal segmentation for accuracy, repeatability, and clinical acceptability given a relevant range of imaging abnormalities in clinical epilepsy. METHODS: Forty‐nine patients with hippocampal asymmetry were identified from our institutional radiology database, including two patients with significant anatomic deformations. Manual hippocampal tracing was performed by experienced technologists on 3T MPRAGE images, measuring hippocampal volume up to the tectal plate, excluding the hippocampal tail. The same images were processed using NeuroQuant and FreeSurfer software. Ten subjects underwent repeated manual hippocampal tracings by two additional technologists blinded to previous results to evaluate consistency. Ten patients with two clinical MRI studies had volume measurements repeated using NeuroQuant and FreeSurfer. RESULTS: FreeSurfer raw volumes were significantly lower than NeuroQuant (P < 0.001, right and left), and hippocampal asymmetry estimates were lower for both automatic methods than manual tracing (P < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after scaling volumes to age, gender, and scanner matched normative percentiles. Volume reproducibility was fair (0.4–0.59) for manual tracing, and excellent (>0.75) for both automated methods. Asymmetry index reproducibility was excellent (>0.75) for manual tracing and FreeSurfer segmentation and fair (0.4–0.59) for NeuroQuant segmentation. Both automatic segmentation methods failed on the two cases with anatomic deformations. Segmentation errors were visually identified in 25 NeuroQuant and 27 FreeSurfer segmentations, and nine (18%) NeuroQuant and six (12%) FreeSurfer errors were judged clinically significant. INTERPRETATION: Automated hippocampal volumes are more reproducible than hand‐traced hippocampal volumes. However, these methods fail in some cases, and significant segmentation errors can occur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6764491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67644912019-09-30 Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes Brinkmann, Benjamin H. Guragain, Hari Kenney‐Jung, Daniel Mandrekar, Jay Watson, Robert E. Welker, Kirk M. Britton, Jeffrey W. Witte, Robert J. Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To rigorously compare automated atlas‐based and manual tracing hippocampal segmentation for accuracy, repeatability, and clinical acceptability given a relevant range of imaging abnormalities in clinical epilepsy. METHODS: Forty‐nine patients with hippocampal asymmetry were identified from our institutional radiology database, including two patients with significant anatomic deformations. Manual hippocampal tracing was performed by experienced technologists on 3T MPRAGE images, measuring hippocampal volume up to the tectal plate, excluding the hippocampal tail. The same images were processed using NeuroQuant and FreeSurfer software. Ten subjects underwent repeated manual hippocampal tracings by two additional technologists blinded to previous results to evaluate consistency. Ten patients with two clinical MRI studies had volume measurements repeated using NeuroQuant and FreeSurfer. RESULTS: FreeSurfer raw volumes were significantly lower than NeuroQuant (P < 0.001, right and left), and hippocampal asymmetry estimates were lower for both automatic methods than manual tracing (P < 0.0001). Differences remained significant after scaling volumes to age, gender, and scanner matched normative percentiles. Volume reproducibility was fair (0.4–0.59) for manual tracing, and excellent (>0.75) for both automated methods. Asymmetry index reproducibility was excellent (>0.75) for manual tracing and FreeSurfer segmentation and fair (0.4–0.59) for NeuroQuant segmentation. Both automatic segmentation methods failed on the two cases with anatomic deformations. Segmentation errors were visually identified in 25 NeuroQuant and 27 FreeSurfer segmentations, and nine (18%) NeuroQuant and six (12%) FreeSurfer errors were judged clinically significant. INTERPRETATION: Automated hippocampal volumes are more reproducible than hand‐traced hippocampal volumes. However, these methods fail in some cases, and significant segmentation errors can occur. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6764491/ /pubmed/31489797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50885 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Brinkmann, Benjamin H. Guragain, Hari Kenney‐Jung, Daniel Mandrekar, Jay Watson, Robert E. Welker, Kirk M. Britton, Jeffrey W. Witte, Robert J. Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title | Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title_full | Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title_fullStr | Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title_short | Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
title_sort | segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinkmannbenjaminh segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT guragainhari segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT kenneyjungdaniel segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT mandrekarjay segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT watsonroberte segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT welkerkirkm segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT brittonjeffreyw segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes AT witterobertj segmentationerrorsandintertestreliabilityinautomatedandmanuallytracedhippocampalvolumes |