Cargando…

Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire

Introduction Rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure. The goal of the surgery is not only to restore the function and youthful appearance of the nose but also to improve quality of life. With the passage of time, the trend has been changing rapidly from more invasive to less invasive procedures. Alth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Nasir, Rashid, Mamoon, Khan, Ibrahim, Ur Rehman Sarwar, Saad, Ur Rashid, Haroon, Khurshid, Mariam, Khalid Choudry, Usama, Fatima, Noor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576273
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5283
_version_ 1783454416981983232
author Khan, Nasir
Rashid, Mamoon
Khan, Ibrahim
Ur Rehman Sarwar, Saad
Ur Rashid, Haroon
Khurshid, Mariam
Khalid Choudry, Usama
Fatima, Noor
author_facet Khan, Nasir
Rashid, Mamoon
Khan, Ibrahim
Ur Rehman Sarwar, Saad
Ur Rashid, Haroon
Khurshid, Mariam
Khalid Choudry, Usama
Fatima, Noor
author_sort Khan, Nasir
collection PubMed
description Introduction Rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure. The goal of the surgery is not only to restore the function and youthful appearance of the nose but also to improve quality of life. With the passage of time, the trend has been changing rapidly from more invasive to less invasive procedures. Although the technical aspects of rhinoplasty are important, patient satisfaction is the factor that dictates the success of the procedure. Materials and methods A total of 118 rhinoplasties were performed in our department between 2016 and 2018. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire was used to study the patients' satisfaction level. Ninety out of 118 patients took part in this study. Rhinoplasty was done using an open technique in all cases. The ROE questionnaire was filled preoperation and six months postoperation. Data analysis was done using SSPS statistic version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Results The main reasons for rhinoplasty in our patients were: aesthetic 23.3% (n=21), functional 25.5% (n=23), and a combination of both in 51% (n=46) patients. The mean ROE score of all patients preoperation was 30.5 (males: 31.3, females 29.8) and the mean score postoperation was 79.5 (males 78.2, females 80.9) at six months with no statistical differences (CI 17.11 - 12.59, P=0.762). However, both genders showed a statistically significant improvement between the preoperative and postoperative scores (mean difference = 49.3, CI 63.25 - 35.34, P<0.01), indicating an overall good satisfaction level after surgery. The satisfaction level of patients was inversely proportional to their level of understanding and knowledge of the surgical procedure. This difference was statistically significant ( CI 7.36-10.42, P<0.01). Minor corrections or modifications were done in eight patients under local anesthesia, with no significant difference in ROE scores as compared to those who had single surgery (CI 0.7 - 1.6, P=0.92). There was no statistically significant difference in the before and after surgery ROE scores among patients operated by different surgeons as well (P=0.82). Conclusion Our study shows that rhinoplasty, despite being a complex procedure, has proven benefits in terms of functional as well as aesthetic outcomes. The ROE questionnaire proves to be a valid tool for estimating patient satisfaction in our population. There is a need for further training and education of surgeons in Pakistan to improve the functional and aesthetic disabilities of nasal deformities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67646422019-10-01 Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire Khan, Nasir Rashid, Mamoon Khan, Ibrahim Ur Rehman Sarwar, Saad Ur Rashid, Haroon Khurshid, Mariam Khalid Choudry, Usama Fatima, Noor Cureus Plastic Surgery Introduction Rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure. The goal of the surgery is not only to restore the function and youthful appearance of the nose but also to improve quality of life. With the passage of time, the trend has been changing rapidly from more invasive to less invasive procedures. Although the technical aspects of rhinoplasty are important, patient satisfaction is the factor that dictates the success of the procedure. Materials and methods A total of 118 rhinoplasties were performed in our department between 2016 and 2018. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire was used to study the patients' satisfaction level. Ninety out of 118 patients took part in this study. Rhinoplasty was done using an open technique in all cases. The ROE questionnaire was filled preoperation and six months postoperation. Data analysis was done using SSPS statistic version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Results The main reasons for rhinoplasty in our patients were: aesthetic 23.3% (n=21), functional 25.5% (n=23), and a combination of both in 51% (n=46) patients. The mean ROE score of all patients preoperation was 30.5 (males: 31.3, females 29.8) and the mean score postoperation was 79.5 (males 78.2, females 80.9) at six months with no statistical differences (CI 17.11 - 12.59, P=0.762). However, both genders showed a statistically significant improvement between the preoperative and postoperative scores (mean difference = 49.3, CI 63.25 - 35.34, P<0.01), indicating an overall good satisfaction level after surgery. The satisfaction level of patients was inversely proportional to their level of understanding and knowledge of the surgical procedure. This difference was statistically significant ( CI 7.36-10.42, P<0.01). Minor corrections or modifications were done in eight patients under local anesthesia, with no significant difference in ROE scores as compared to those who had single surgery (CI 0.7 - 1.6, P=0.92). There was no statistically significant difference in the before and after surgery ROE scores among patients operated by different surgeons as well (P=0.82). Conclusion Our study shows that rhinoplasty, despite being a complex procedure, has proven benefits in terms of functional as well as aesthetic outcomes. The ROE questionnaire proves to be a valid tool for estimating patient satisfaction in our population. There is a need for further training and education of surgeons in Pakistan to improve the functional and aesthetic disabilities of nasal deformities. Cureus 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6764642/ /pubmed/31576273 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5283 Text en Copyright © 2019, Khan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery
Khan, Nasir
Rashid, Mamoon
Khan, Ibrahim
Ur Rehman Sarwar, Saad
Ur Rashid, Haroon
Khurshid, Mariam
Khalid Choudry, Usama
Fatima, Noor
Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title_full Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title_fullStr Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title_short Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire
title_sort satisfaction in patients after rhinoplasty using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire
topic Plastic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576273
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5283
work_keys_str_mv AT khannasir satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT rashidmamoon satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT khanibrahim satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT urrehmansarwarsaad satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT urrashidharoon satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT khurshidmariam satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT khalidchoudryusama satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire
AT fatimanoor satisfactioninpatientsafterrhinoplastyusingtherhinoplastyoutcomeevaluationquestionnaire