Cargando…
Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population
PURPOSE: To provide population-based reference values for cervical spinal canal parameters and vertebral body (VB) width and to study their associations with sex, age, body height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) using MRI. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses included data from 2,453 participant...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31560692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222682 |
_version_ | 1783454430118543360 |
---|---|
author | Nell, Christopher Bülow, Robin Hosten, Norbert Schmidt, Carsten Oliver Hegenscheid, Katrin |
author_facet | Nell, Christopher Bülow, Robin Hosten, Norbert Schmidt, Carsten Oliver Hegenscheid, Katrin |
author_sort | Nell, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To provide population-based reference values for cervical spinal canal parameters and vertebral body (VB) width and to study their associations with sex, age, body height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) using MRI. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses included data from 2,453 participants, aged 21–89 years, of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) who underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 Tesla between July 2008 and March 2011. A standardised reading was performed for the C2-C7 cervical spine levels at sagittal T2 TSE weighted sequences. RESULTS: Reference intervals for spinal canal parameters were similar in males and females, while VB width was on average 2.1–2.2 mm larger in males. Age effects were only substantial regarding VB width with a 0.5 mm per ten-year age increase. Body height effects were only substantial regarding the osseous spinal canal and VB width. Body weight and BMI effects are mostly not substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides MRI-based reference values for the cervical spinal canal parameters in an adult Caucasian population. Except for VB width, associations with sex, age and somatometric measures are mostly small and thus have only limited clinical implications. Some available cut-off values may need a revision because they likely overestimate risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6764695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67646952019-10-12 Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population Nell, Christopher Bülow, Robin Hosten, Norbert Schmidt, Carsten Oliver Hegenscheid, Katrin PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To provide population-based reference values for cervical spinal canal parameters and vertebral body (VB) width and to study their associations with sex, age, body height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) using MRI. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses included data from 2,453 participants, aged 21–89 years, of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) who underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 Tesla between July 2008 and March 2011. A standardised reading was performed for the C2-C7 cervical spine levels at sagittal T2 TSE weighted sequences. RESULTS: Reference intervals for spinal canal parameters were similar in males and females, while VB width was on average 2.1–2.2 mm larger in males. Age effects were only substantial regarding VB width with a 0.5 mm per ten-year age increase. Body height effects were only substantial regarding the osseous spinal canal and VB width. Body weight and BMI effects are mostly not substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides MRI-based reference values for the cervical spinal canal parameters in an adult Caucasian population. Except for VB width, associations with sex, age and somatometric measures are mostly small and thus have only limited clinical implications. Some available cut-off values may need a revision because they likely overestimate risks. Public Library of Science 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6764695/ /pubmed/31560692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222682 Text en © 2019 Nell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nell, Christopher Bülow, Robin Hosten, Norbert Schmidt, Carsten Oliver Hegenscheid, Katrin Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title | Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title_full | Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title_fullStr | Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title_full_unstemmed | Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title_short | Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population |
title_sort | reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by mri in a general population |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31560692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nellchristopher referencevaluesforthecervicalspinalcanalandthevertebralbodiesbymriinageneralpopulation AT bulowrobin referencevaluesforthecervicalspinalcanalandthevertebralbodiesbymriinageneralpopulation AT hostennorbert referencevaluesforthecervicalspinalcanalandthevertebralbodiesbymriinageneralpopulation AT schmidtcarstenoliver referencevaluesforthecervicalspinalcanalandthevertebralbodiesbymriinageneralpopulation AT hegenscheidkatrin referencevaluesforthecervicalspinalcanalandthevertebralbodiesbymriinageneralpopulation |